|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
gasperc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 07:35 PM Original message |
UPSET*** Lamont on CT ballot: over 32% of delegate vote UPDATE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joemurphy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
1. Great news! Maybe we can get rid of this massive millstone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rose Siding (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
2. 33.4% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 07:49 PM Response to Original message |
3. Yippee. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
4. From Lamont's Blog--34% |
madaboutharry (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 08:02 PM Response to Original message |
5. Who are these people voting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pale Blue Dot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 08:05 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Most Democrats are not us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madaboutharry (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 08:17 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. I know what you say is true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MissWaverly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-20-06 12:37 PM Response to Reply #7 |
49. Yes, all they remember is Lieberman was Gore's running mate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DODI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 08:11 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. It is all about the $$$$$. That is why the CT Dem Party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-20-06 05:03 PM Response to Reply #9 |
52. Well, here in liberal New Haven I petitioned for Ned and found |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-20-06 06:03 AM Response to Reply #5 |
37. From what I understand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-20-06 08:46 AM Response to Reply #37 |
45. small towns and suburbs owe NOTHING to Lieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-20-06 08:45 AM Response to Reply #5 |
44. Lieberman is extremely powerful in the state party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pale Blue Dot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 08:04 PM Response to Original message |
6. I'll be working for Ned! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-20-06 06:56 AM Response to Reply #6 |
39. Congrats on the residency status |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DearAbby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 08:11 PM Response to Original message |
8. Well, Hell Yeah! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bonhomme Richard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
10. Glad to hear it. I'm tired of sending......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakeme2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
11. I guess Lieberman plan to freeze out Lamont voters isn't working |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wakeme2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
13. K&NOM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiviaOlivia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
14. "Can you hear the Thunder?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lost-in-FL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 08:42 PM Response to Original message |
15. Lieberman said he would run as an independent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 09:28 PM Response to Reply #15 |
23. Please stop posting lies about Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnOhioan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 09:36 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Joey is a Dem??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 09:42 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Lieberman a Democrat? In Name Only. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eridani (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-20-06 03:25 AM Response to Reply #23 |
35. He said he'd consider it, though-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewJeffCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-20-06 06:59 AM Response to Reply #35 |
40. Yes, he did say he would consider it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-20-06 09:33 AM Response to Reply #40 |
47. I think he is more interested in helping Bushco than opposing it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kohodog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-20-06 07:14 AM Response to Reply #23 |
41. He has not agreed to support the democratic nominee however. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ihelpu2see (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-20-06 08:17 AM Response to Reply #23 |
42. When asked if he would rule out running as an ind. he said he could not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTLawGuy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-20-06 08:48 AM Response to Reply #23 |
46. basically he did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 08:55 PM Response to Original message |
16. Did Jolene cry? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiviaOlivia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 09:05 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-20-06 01:06 AM Response to Reply #16 |
32. No upstanding woman dressed in pink |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arugula Latte (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-21-06 01:06 AM Response to Reply #16 |
53. Oh gawd. Why did I view that image before going to bed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadMaddie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
17. Oh Happy Day!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Peace Patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
18. Congratulations to Ned Lamont and his supporters! This is great news! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elfin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
20. Sent a few $ to Ned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
21. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
22. Winning 2-1 is being 'upset?' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slampoet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 09:33 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. This is 33% of CT Democratic Delegates, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robbien (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 09:47 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Yes, and Joe had to get on the phone personally |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ihelpu2see (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-20-06 08:21 AM Response to Reply #24 |
43. Yup, Insiders said if it was a private ballot that it could have been a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-20-06 02:48 PM Response to Reply #22 |
50. When 33% of the "Incumbent Protection Network"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
28. Why are so many Democrats fed up with Joe? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bleedingheart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
29. I hope Lamont unseats Joementum... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-20-06 04:58 AM Response to Reply #29 |
36. He IS on the ballot! Let the race begin!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brooklynite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
30. Anyone know what happened at the Republican Convention? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OctOct1 (357 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-19-06 10:10 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. WFSB Just said it is tomorrow night |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
norml (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-20-06 01:26 AM Response to Original message |
33. Democratic Rival Forces Lieberman Into a Primary (NYT) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-20-06 01:29 AM Response to Original message |
34. Very Good News! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-20-06 06:43 AM Response to Original message |
38. Hmm, maybe Lamont can potentially win this Senate seat this term. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-20-06 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
48. WOW- people were only expecting around that 15%. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-20-06 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
51. Lieberman-Harris 2008. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 11th 2024, 09:01 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC