Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What's the Difference Between "English Only" and Whites Only? (jpg)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:20 PM
Original message
What's the Difference Between "English Only" and Whites Only? (jpg)
for those with a modicum of common sense and Liberal morality, and who recognize the fascist and racist underpinnings of this so called "issue" ...

download this flyer and take it to the streets or make a bumper sticker out of it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. the difference is if you can't tell the fireman what room your kid is in
or the police officer what happened or the doctor in the ER where the pain is.

There is a practical side to it but it's being hijacked by both sides for their own agendas.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. can you not point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
29. This thread shouldn't be funny--but thanks for the laugh!
:rofl;
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unlawflcombatnt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. Amen
You're absolutely correct.

:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. It's a reality in my neck o' the woods--er, cactus, and the police
and fire personnel receive bonuses for learning another language--as do I, another public servant.

That is a terribly weak argument--especially since so many crossers WON'T call the pd or fire out of fear.

Somehow I expected more from you, sg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #28
64. Well, what on earth is a "crosser"?
That's an odd phrase. Guffawing at can't they just "point" is equally bizarre. I don't get this - it IS public safety I was talking about. Let's flip it around: what if only spanish (pick your language) speaking firement are sent into a fine white middle class neighborhood to go rescue kids and put out fires. I wonder if the pointing jokes are still so funny.

It's not a weak argument; I live in a district of the city where just a few blocks away there really ARE people who couldn't tell a fireman what room their kid was in. The reality is that the great majority of all law enforcement personnel only speak English, bonuses and incentives aside.

Anyway, I was offering up a middle of the road argument - as someone whose first language was German I can speak to this issue.

At least try to learn the local language - why is that something some of us are against? I know it's not instantaneous, but shouldn't we at least be encouraging it with valid reasons to learn it rather than political reasons NOT to?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
31. excellent analysis, sir
the distinction you have drawn is a point well taken
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
33. like i said... a modicum of common sense and rational thinking is
woefully lacking.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #33
68. I confess I'm having a hard time distinguishing
agreement from its sarcastic obverse.

I'm prepared to either agree with you or circumsize you with a rusty spork. After lunch. If I still feel like it.

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-30-06 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
71. My observation here in Southern California
is that most Spanish-speaking people CAN speak at least some English, but they're just happier conversing in their native tongue, so you just don't see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King Coal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. One concerns language the other concerns race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
34. Nope.
Both "issues" in the context of what is being passed off "debate" yet, legislated is nothing other than White Supremacy or White Nationalism -aka Neo-Nazi Fascism.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Your reaction was predicted and desired...
The GOP Senators who pushed that legislation went home giggling. They wanted a partisan fight and got it. Most people think the US already has English as the official language, so the legislation is lost on them. However, that 30-some Senators (all Dems) voted against it is worth noting to them: Why would true-blue Americans vote against having English as the official language? Why indeed. It would have been better to go home early and miss that vote.

Giving the knuckledraggers air time and blog time is bullshit. Reid did his opponents a host of favors by calling them racists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnyrocket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I agree, the left has overreached on this one..
...English is our binding as a society, any country that has multiple languages, has problems...infighting, wars, strife.

English should be our official language, and it certainly shouldn't be a partisan fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. reminds me of the French-only canadians
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. "reminds me of the French-only canadians" Not relevent to the...
language controversy in the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #20
41. it absolutely is relevant. eom
Edited on Mon May-22-06 06:15 PM by radio4progressives
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #41
51. I should say relevant but not comparable..............
The French have have legal and constitutional
rights in Canada going back to the BNA Act of
1867. Before that the British government granted
the French and the Catholic Church traditional
rights after the French defeat on the Plains of Abraham.

More recently Quebec instituted French only language
laws (notably 1977’s Bill 101) but this hasn't
changed the cultural or economic dynamics in Canada
to any significant degree. The attitude of the average
Canadian is 'who cares?'

So the French situation is quite different to the
position of Mexicans in the American South West.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
42. it absolutely is identical. it's fascistic, nationalistic and smells of
Neo-Nazi memes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. B.S. Switzerland has four national languages, German, French,
Italian, and Rumantsch. They haven't had any significant infighting since 1648 and as for wars, they have been officially neutral since 1812. It is too much emphasis on conforming to one culture and language that creates civil strife. We need English as a national language to facilitate public education, commerce and the political process. But there is no reason a great nation can't accomodate minority languages and there is no need for an "official language".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Canada & Belgium are other "hellholes" with multiple languages.
There are some difficulties in those countries, but NO wars.

Didn't we have a pretty bad war here in 1861--with English speakers on both sides?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. English was our predominant language in 1861.
But we had a bloody Civil War, anyway. That was a pretty significant "unraveling."

I see plenty of infighting in today's USA. Mostly between folks who speak English.

Immigrants have always arrived speaking other languages. The grandkids end up speaking English only--unfortunately.

Of course, Spanish will continue to be spoken in Texas. No problemo.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. And something akin to French is spoken by the Cajuns. And it doesn't
cause strife - it attracts tourists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #27
43. Cajuns were forced to immigrate to Lousiana from Canada
their language is rooted in French, but naturally took on a dialect that strayed abit from it's mother tongue one could say..

the music is great and so is the food and great culture.

Most Americans didn't even know they existed before 20 years ago.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #27
52. Interesting. The Cajuns originally came from Nova Scotia .........


Cajun French is in danger of being lost because
young people aren't learning it so French teachers
from QUEBEC have moved to LA to help out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #52
56. Vivre le français et vivre les cadiens!
I hope the teachers from Quebec know the indigenous Cajun culture and language, but with organizations dedicated to reviving the culture and the language i think there would be a good chance but this English Only bill threatens that effort as well.

It is but one of many many many points in our collective history where White Supremacy and Nationalistic (racism) attitudes sought to suppress the many different cultures which have made our nation so rich, and vibrant. I and I appreciate you raising this point.

Here's a little reminder of the cultural persecutions in our recent past when the state of Louisiana mandated English Only laws:

http://www.breauxbridgelive.com/cajunhistory.html

The French language remained the dominant language in South Louisiana until the early 20th century, when a state mandate forbade the speaking of French on the school grounds.

Two generations of Cajuns were punished and made to feel ashamed for speaking French. Subsequently, the language (which is at the heart of the culture) nearly died.

In 1968, the CODOFIL (Council for the Development of French in Louisiana) was formed and the tide began to turn. A renaissance of the French language was spurred by French immersion programs throughout South Louisiana. Today, thanks to the efforts of groups like CODOFIL, ACTION CADIENNE, the Cajun French Music Association, L'ACadjin and others, the Cajun culture and French language is experiencing new prosperity. Vivre le français et vivre les cadiens!






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. From Wiki ..........


Some francophones from overseas say that Acadian French sounds archaic citing characteristics such as pronunciation and lexical items (vocabulary) reminiscent of the language of Rabelais and Molière. Cajun French, a regional dialect spoken in Southern Louisiana in the United States, is a direct descendant of Acadian French.

Acadian French is descended from the French dialects of Anjou and of Poitou in France. Since there was no linguistic contact with France from the late 18th century until the 20th century, Acadian French retained features that died out during the French standardization efforts of the 19th century, including an alveolar r, and the third-person plural ending of verbs "-ont", e.g. ils mangeont (IPA: /i mɑ̃ʒɔ̃/), as compared to ils mangent, which does not have an ending that is pronounced.

Many speakers of other dialects of French, such as speakers of Metropolitan French, i.e. the French of France, and even of other Canadian dialects, have difficulty understanding Acadian French.

See also Chiac, a mixed language based on French and English, and Saint Mary's Bay French, a distinct variety of Acadian French spoken around Saint Mary's Bay, Nova Scotia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #58
65. Yes, Ann Savoy spoke about this ...
Cajun Accordianist Marc Savoy's wife Ann Savoy (who speaks French)writes about this in her book: A Reflection of a People

http://www.lsue.edu/acadgate/music/savoy.htm

Ann Allen Savoy was born and raised in Richmond, Va. She learned French when she was a child, and she also majored in French in college. Her musical interest began in her childhood, and she began playing the guitar at age 12. She met Marc Savoy at the 1975 National Folk Festival in Washington, D.C., and they were married the following year. Her book, Cajun Music: A Reflection of a People, is an essential source for anyone interested in Cajun or Creole music. It includes music and lyrics in French (including phonetic pronunciations) with English translations to many traditional songs, interviews with dozens of musicians, many of whom have now passed from the scene, many old photographs, plus historical overviews and articles on instruments, and musical styles.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
40. It's true, I am Left of Adolph Hitler, and Hitler would agree with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-30-06 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
70. Switzerland? (Oops! Didn't see previous post! )
Edited on Tue May-30-06 09:48 PM by WinkyDink
4 languages, pretty peaceful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VaYallaDawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Right on!
Their strategy continues - (and I hate to admit, it's successful). It's just like a pack of wolves separating out a lone sheep from the herd. First it was gay people, gay marriage, all that BS. Now, it's immigrants, people who don't speak English. If they decide the elderly are small enough of a minority, then it could possibly be old people. And of course, their antagonism towards Black people has always been just barely masked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #9
44. That's what the Social Security "debate" was about..
to pit generation against generation - people of the same family!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
36. I think you're betraying our country's ideals.
Sure, you're taking the easy way.

But you know that all this legislation is, is a way to ostracize and scapegoat people.

Sometimes you just have to do things because it's the right thing to do. And, you know, maybe you should more faith in Americans, as well as the CONSTITUENTS of the Democratic Party.

Hmmmm.......constituents....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
39. Why Would a "true blue American" oppose Nationalizing the Language?
I might take a stab at what should be obvious to most people who received a public education, might remember a bit of 20th Century history in a country called Germany and leader with the name of Adolph Hitler.

While it is true, there are Neo Nazi's in this country, and even supporters of Hitler during his time, Prescott Bush, Henry Ford, IBM et al - most "True Blue" Americans (who received a public education in this country) would outright reject LEGISLATING anything that smacks of Nationalism, which this obviously does.

The English language is already ESTABLISHED as the "national" language. it doesn't require LEGISLATING. The entire business world speaks English. It's already international. Legislating opens the door to criminalizing other languagues from being spoken or written in our country. And that is the ultimate goal by those who wrote that bill in the first place.

Basta!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. English has no color
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. Even Foriegn countries recognise the value in speaking english

Poor English bad for RP economy


By Eunice Fernando and Sarah Azucena

For decades the troubled Philippine economy has been able to bank on one key asset in attracting foreign investors—proficiency in the English language.

In recent years this advantage has helped win outsourcing contracts in the booming business-process outsourcing and call centers, one of the few areas of the nation’s economy that are actually expanding.

But even that lifeline in this poor country appears tenuous as fears surface over a sharp decline in English compounded by falling school standards and an exodus of linguistically skilled professionals.

Business leaders are beginning to question just how long the country can go on touting its English skills.
http://www.manilatimes.net/national/2006/may/23/yehey/top_stories/20060523top5.html


Sorry if this disappoints you but encouraging the immigrant population to learn english helps to prevent them from being exploited
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. there's a diff between *encouraging* and requiring
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. New English language amendment requires nothing
So what is your point.

It doesn't stop bilingual education or spanish interpreters in court so what exactly is your point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #23
45. It opens the door just for all of these things to happen
and if you have been paying attention to how this Congress works and how the Fascists and the Neo-Nazi's and the Fundies have been working their political "craft" in advancing their agenda, this is exactly how they do it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coyote_Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. English
is to language is to learned as white is to race is to inherent.

You can acquire some additional language skills - you cannot change your race.

I have a friend who moved to another country about 15 years ago and was not able to speak their language (or any other language except English). Within 6 weeks whe was able to communicate basic needs and get directions and buy necessities and travel and such. Within a year she was working as a translator. Because she works with indigenous people groups she has had to learn over 20 native tongues. Her English is now very heavily accented and she says most of her dreams are in her new language.

Language and the ability to communicate are a very practical issue with potentially enormous health and safety implications.

You will also find that if you want to immigrate elsewhere in the world that language skills often are a factor. Canada, for example, considers fluency in both English and French among their criteria in granting immigrant status.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. There's no difference.
It'd also be like having an official religion.

It's inherently bigoted bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
32. Yes there is
You can learn English.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. You can bleach your hair and skin.
And it's easier than learning English.

So, no, there's no difference. It's a bunch of racist bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
37. It's almost that simple.
With a few- very minor- practical issues thrown in.

It's a classic, bigoted wedge issue.

I stand with those Senators who opposed this. It was simply right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. One affects other people, the other doesn't.
I'm not pushing for an official language, but I wouldn't set up a strawman in opposition to one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I hate to mention this but we do not speak English we speak
American. It is quite different. Bush speaks Gibberish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Granted that we speak American English.
I still don't see the point of trying to cram a square peg into a round hole in this one, especially since everyone can see it's a square peg and a round hole. People aren't generally convinced by transparently manipulative tactics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
49. Both Affects "other people".
how could you possibly say or think otherwise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. You're misinterpreting what I'm saying.
Whether or not someone is white or not shouldn't affect anyone else. Language by it's very nature does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #50
54. My bad - i did misunderstand, thanks for the clarity.. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pocket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
14. anyone of any race can learn English
duh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
17. Only an insecure government mandates an "official language"
It is funny to me that conservatives are getting all pissy about making English the official language. Guess which country we most resemble if we were to do that?...........France.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
30. Many nations have official languages.
Quite a few nations even have more than one official language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #30
48. Yep. No Doubt.
But so what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
46. It's the Fascists M.O.
first they introduce something that just seems symbolic at most...

But it's laying down the foundation for more significant legislation down the road - that has Nationalistic implications, and ultimately the criminalization of the use of other languages in this country.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ugarte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
18. If the point is to be more cohesive as a nation
shouldn't we all be the same religion as well? After all, religion is very divisive. Maybe we should all be English-only Christians.

(Not me, though, no thanks.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wheres The Beef Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
19. What color is English?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
26. Come on, this is ridiculous.
Save the racism talk for cases of actual racism. Anyone of any color can learn to speak English. I fail to see what the problem is in expecting people that want to come here to learn the language. If I moved to Germany I would learn to speak German.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #26
38. The problem with expecting people that want to come here to
learn the language is expecting people that come here to learn the language.

Mind your own business.

Same as gay marriage.

This is nothing but a tool for ostracization. If people don't want to or CAN'T learn English, that's them. This legislation is only there to punish and outcast them.

It, in fact, does nothing to ACTUALLY HELP PEOPLE LEARN THE LANGUAGE, does it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #26
47. This is Racism.
but Most White People can't see it, refuse to see it, and don't want to admit it. Just because don't want to admit it, doesn't mean that it isn't the reality.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 02:49 AM
Response to Reply #26
61. Exactly.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
53. STOP IT.
If you really need to know, educate yourself and ask a linguist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ismnotwasm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
55. I understand your point
It's my experience that immigrants DO learn at least some English. I've stayed away from this issue because I don't quite get it.
WHO is NOT learning English? WHO are the immigrants not trying? Do we have a underground cabal of immigrants refusing to learn? Living on "the dole" (to use an old term for welfare) Not willing to work? I have Filipino neighbors on my right, Cambodian on my left. Mexicans up the street. El Salvadorian. Vietnamese. Chinese immigrants own my favorite gas station. We have a strong Samoan community. Korean community. All speak English or are trying to learn, at the same time offering the riches of community and culture brought from their native land. I've worked with many Ethiopian and Eritrean immigrants--All, and I mean ALL were MULTI-lingual some speaking as many as 7 languages. I work with Gambian, Mexican, Korean, Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Ukrainian, French Canadian, Kenyan nurses. Just what I can think of of the top of my head. The nurses speak fluent English, albeit with an accent.

I live in the most ethnically diverse neighborhood I've ever seen. I'm surrounded by immigrants. We have the Hmong who were so poorly treated during the Vietnam war. We have a Cambodian refugee support center. Pol Pot anyone? Hell, over the hill we have a hispanic Narcotics Anonymous office. If the adult or older immigrants have difficulty with English, their children sure don't.
So I ask, because I really really don't get it. Who are these immigrants not trying their hardest to make it in this country? Why do we need a mandate or law saying English only? Even the "illegals" I've met or ones with green cards know at least some English. Or are trying to learn. They're not stupid. "English Only" is a racist insult. It assumes these hard working people many who have suffered far more than is possible to believe aren't trying, don't want to try to learn.

If it's a Republican straw man to make an divisive issue, it's very, very sad anybody buys into it.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. Very well put, thank you for this contribution... eom
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ismnotwasm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. You're welcome
One of the things I've noticed is the focus on "Mexicans" Like South America isn't a continent. Like they're the only immigrants in this country. It pisses me off. We have a wealth of immigrants. Many, many languages. And we're still a melting pot. I personally love culture and cultures. I love Ethnicity. I love skin colors. So much of it is art. It adds riches and dimension to my life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #59
66. Hear! Hear!
The so called "English Only" legislation is the foundation to make legal what amounts to as a Cultural Genocide. It needs to be opposed just as every other racist and xenophobic policy.

This morning, as i'm listening to the PR flaks are arguing that the English Only bill intends to "Unify" .. intended to bring us together as a country. Poppycock! What DoubleSpeak!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
60. Plenty. And if you refuse to see the diference, it's no use arguing with
you.

It's a waste of time and effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radio4progressives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #60
67. You Just made my case.. This isn't about "unifying" the country
Edited on Tue May-23-06 12:15 PM by radio4progressives
As one white English speaking person to another white English speaking person ....you just proved that this issue is as divisive as was intended to be when the racists bastards in Congress introduced this bill in the first place.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-30-06 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #67
69. Bullshit. But I expect as much from you.
You are hopeless if you can't see the difference.

You proved MY point - handily
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 05:07 AM
Response to Original message
62. Try living in Belgium
11 million people living in a tiny country.

5 million speak French as their first language.

6 million speak Dutch (or Flemish).

They can't get along. In fact - a lot of them hate the other half of the country.

They basically have ethnic cleansing - many years before Yugoslavia broke up.

If you live in a Flemish town, the French language is banned, and vice-versa.

PS - I guess the difference is ... anyone can learn English! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
63. You can't learn to be white
Well, at least most people can't...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC