Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fox Idiots --- Richard Clarke and Wesley Clark are different people!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 11:46 PM
Original message
Fox Idiots --- Richard Clarke and Wesley Clark are different people!!!
This item came to my inbox from a Google News alert (set for Wesley Clark). I have no idea who Mike Straka is, but here's his "sign":

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,196512,00.html

Sean Penn is going to play Gen. Wesley Clark in a film adaptation of his book "Against All Enemies." No doubt Penn will take the opportunity to talk about his personal views on the War on Terror.


How stupid ARE these people? (You don't have to answer.) :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. And ya know, they USED to be PETULA CLARK!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Dirty gender traitors! Both children of Dick Clark, I guess. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Or Clark Kent. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #7
20. there you go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 02:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
19. His age would be about right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
27. Descendent of Lewis and Clark, no doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
37. I thought Richard Clarke was hilarious
on Hee-Haw . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. All libruls look alike. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LA lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ha!!
At least they didn't reference American Bandstand!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. I have no problem with this
I appreciate them validating what we already knew.....HOW DAMN stupid they are.

I have to admit Sean Penn at Richard Clarke is strange casting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-22-06 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yeah -- why let simple facts get in the way of "truthiness?"
I can't see Penn as Clarke either, but who knows?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
21. Fatcs? who cares about facts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
8. Did they mention that the author of ...
... "Against all Enemies" was once the bass player in a band called "The Dave Clark Five" back in the 'sixties? He later gained some prominence in the snack-food industry, when a candy bar was named after him.

Little known facts from the 'Where Are They Now' files ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
9. I can see one of my favorite actors, Sean Penn, as Richard Clarke,
playing and being the righteous man. Not Wesley, but Mr. Richard Clarke, who called this admin out early on terrorism, when it counted, but no one paid attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. Now that's odd:
Richard Clarke said when he thought about going public with what he knew, he called Wesley Clark who had already testified to congress advising them NOT to go to war. Anyway, Richard Clarke met with Wesley Clark for coffee. Wes told Richard that the regime would go after him, just as they'd gone after him, but it was necessary to put the welfare of the country first. Thus, he encouraged Richard Clarke to write the book.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. I didn't know that, and it wasn't a slam on Gen. Clark, just a
clarification on the Clark(e)s. I like them both! :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarolNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #16
28. Clarke and Hersh too...
I love that story about Wes and Richard Clarke...

Also this one that Seymour Hersh related to Amy Goodman about his encounters with Wes Clark:

AMY GOODMAN: Can you talk about Operation Anaconda in Afghanistan?

SEYMOUR HERSH: This is -- it's interesting. I have been doing interviews, and you're the first person to ask me about it. This is a story that I didn't write. I was doing a lot of work, as you know, since 9/11. I have been sort of writing the alternative history of the war, with the help of people on the inside. I'm not -- you know, people -- there are people all along very high levels who don't approve of what's going on. It's very hard for people in certain positions in the military and the intelligence to come forward. Anaconda was an operation to take place March 1, 2002, where we were going to attack in the mountains, in the eastern mountains of Afghanistan.

The idea was to attack what we believed were a group of embedded al Qaeda living in redoubts, in caves, et cetera. And the army wanted to do it. There had been -- the war had been going on for months. It had been largely a special forces war and air force war. The army and the commander at this time was General Franks. Little did I know then that this Tommy Franks would end up running the war and be described as sort of a hero, because this was Katzenjammer Kids stuff what he did. It was really sort of really dumb. The plan was to recruit some Afghans and with the American soldiers, they initially wanted the marines, they were going to drive -- there was going to be no advanced bombing of the area or artillery, because we did not want to tip off the al Qaeda we were coming. Never mind we were dealing with all of the local Afghan tribes, all of whom we know, history shows, who pays the most determines their loyalty. The idea that you could run a covert operation, particularly the way we move, like General Motors, but that was the idea, so we could have no -- the air force wasn't allowed to do preparatory bombing. We're going to send boys from the Tenth Mountain Division out of Ft. Drum, New York. They're going to paratroop land by helicopter into an area. There's going to be no advance bombing and there's going to be no artillery. And the first wave is going to be a group of Afghans going up a mountain with the marines. The marines said, "Are you kidding?" I quote an ex-- a wonderful marine officer saying -- that's why I love the marines - "We said 'Are you nuts? F*** you. We're not going. We'll go, fight and kill anybody, but we're not stupid. We don't go up a mountain without artillery and without intelligence.'" They wouldn't go, so they send the Afghans up, they get wiped out in what they call registered mortar fire.

In other words, the opposition had mortars aimed at the various congregation sites they had already planned in advance. They were going to be points where they rendezvous. And the fire was already registered. Clearly they knew what the points were going to be. When the Ft. Drum soldiers landed by chopper, up higher in the mountains, their landing zones were also the target of registered mortar fire. In other words, the enemy knew. I think they suffered 28% casualties, not deaths, mostly wounded from shrapnel and other shells in the first thee minutes. Then they ran down the mountain, 100 people, literally, some didn't, perhaps, but many did, including the junior officers, ran from an ambush, not irrational, leaving behind night vision gear, weapons, radios, they just shed themselves and went down the mountain, because otherwise they were in real trouble. They would have been wiped out. It's a nightmare. It was just a nightmare. Then, of course, the press is down below in Bagram near a base. After the first day was over, that's my favorite quote of the war, a lieutenant colonel from the Tenth Mountain Division briefs the American press corps that's down below about what a victory it was. And he said, "The best thing about it is we found and engaged the enemy right away." Which is -- I have to think I said it was a very strange way to describe an ambush. And an air force officer -- the air force went crazy about this. I got there after action started, which was just devastating, I mean, brutal. There's always interesting warfare, but this was extraordinary. They just said, this was the worst they have ever seen. One air force colonel, who is a wonderful, bright young air force colonel said to me, "Well, the army demonstrated that they were able to send a bunch of boys up a mountain to their death." That's what they showed in this mission. Complete disaster. They tried to tell the press as many as 700 al Qaeda were killed. Newsweek reported ten bodies were found. Shades of Vietnam again. But I didn't write it.

What makes it interesting, while doing reporting on it, I called Wesley Clark, the former NATO commander, who is sort of an interesting guy in this stuff, because early in the war, early in my reporting on the war, I had written critically about a Delta Force operation. Delta is the secret unit of the army. The commander unit. They had been ambushed. The Delta guys were enraged. I'm talking about the first month of the war because they had been sent on this stupid operation and they had gotten hurt very badly. And they don't like it. Delta guys, they like to crawl in little holes for a week and get to their target. They were ordered to do it in a different way. Everybody denied the story like crazy. And Wes Clark, to his credit, told a bunch of newspapers, "Look, I know this is right." I had said 13 people were hurt and he said 12 was the number that he had. I saw in him somebody with a great streak of integrity, difficult he may be. In any case, I called him about this story while I was doing it. He encouraged me to write it. I didn't write it. About a year-and-a-half later, he's running for president. I mention this in the book, and I bump into him, and he jumped all over me. He said, "Why didn't you do that story?" I said, "Well, I just thought, it just would have been -- I just didn't do it." He said, "You should have done it. That was your job." Pretty scary. You know, he was right.

http://www.democracynow.org/static/hersh_trans.shtml

"Somebody with a great streak of integrity"....yep, that's a pretty darn good description.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catch22Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
10. Typical
Some fuckin' nimrod spouting out misdirected hatred because it riles the base of knuckle-draggers who don't know the difference. I can guarantee Sean Penn, Larry King, and Oliver Stone know the difference though. Kinda leaves Mike Straka with the shit end of the smart stick, doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
11. Who have they been paying for on-air analysis for the past year??
Edited on Tue May-23-06 12:23 AM by Gloria
Youth wants to know!!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pschoeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
12. This article reminds me of Sunday's Family Guy
Edited on Tue May-23-06 12:35 AM by pschoeb
Where Peter gets hired by the TV Station to do a "Grinds my Gears" segment, which the producers explains to him is to distract people from problems in the Middle East. The whole tuna fish and onions part that is at the begining of this clueless piece is exactly like Peter's bit.

I'm wondering if the Family Guy writers are making fun of this guy, his column is The GRRR! Coulmn, and Peter's has two GR's in it. "GRinds my GeaRs"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
13. My response to the dipstick:
Yesterday you wrote:

"Whoever said anyone really cares about an actor's views on the world?
Just because an actor plays a doctor or a historical figure doesn't mean we care about that actor's views on medicine or the historical significance of his or her character.
Sean Penn is going to play Gen. Wesley Clark in a film adaptation of his book "Against All Enemies." No doubt Penn will take the opportunity to talk about his personal views on the War on Terror."

Actually it's Richard Clarke that Penn is set to play... Whoever said that being a journalist meant that you had to do research? Apparently, not you... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pschoeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Actually the ironic part is Mike Straka is not a journalist but an actor
Edited on Tue May-23-06 12:34 AM by pschoeb
Straka began his career at CBS in New York where he started as a page, ushering audiences and answering phones throughout the network at assignments including "60 Minutes" and "Evening News."

Mike has also been an actor and appeared in soap operas, films -- including the hit movie "Analyze This" -- and theater, including the long-running Off-Broadway interactive play "Tony N' Tina's Wedding." He also starred in several national television commercials.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,37654,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. haHA!!!
And after all, "Whoever said anyone really cares about an actor's views on the world?"

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. That is just hilarious! Someone should call him on that one! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stand and Fight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Okay... I just did... Called him on the irony, that is... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
34. Sounds like your typical no-talent GOP whore. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
23. Wes Clark....
As ageless as Dick Clark, as courageous a truth-teller as Richard Clarke, not as good a singer as Petula Clark, and nowhere near as batsh*t crazy as Ramsey Clark.... no wonder they're confused. He's only the guy who is a forien policy analyst for their network, fercripessake. Is everybody on that side of politics missing the IQ points it takes to be a sharp knife in a drawer or what?

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tenshi816 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
24. It's been corrected now - I just looked.
I held my nose and went on to the site to send him an e-mail to tell him what a clueless idiot he is, but obviously there were other DUers who got in there first!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
25. People should e-mail him and call him "Mike Ditka."
See if he gets the joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. LOL!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
26. I heard a South Carolina official make a similar mistake this weekend -
I think if people can't get even a name right, they have no business sewtting themselves up as analysts.

BTW - the SC guy was talking about Hillary and her cabinet inc Clark, but he fumbld over many of the names - he was playing the GOP scare card.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #26
30. I wish I'd heard it, but I could imagine...
"If the Democrats take over Congress, we could have Speaker Nancy Sinatra and Majority Leader Chip Reid! Then if Hillary Clinton won in 2008, get ready for a cabinet of Clark Kent, that flip-flopper Bob Kerry, and psychic John Edward as attorney general!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Bingo.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. You inspired me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
33. Also this morning on Fox......Just passing by, and they were talking about
Dodd running. They had small squares with pics of all of the "potential" candidates on the Dem side.

What was weird was that everyone is smiling and not bad pics....then the last pic in the set was that of Wes Clark.....looking like he's midway through a sentence in his pic. To myself, I said...these guys don't even want folks to see Wes Clark smiling and looking good.

The used this one:

when they could have used this one:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jai4WKC08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. I like the one they used better.
But I agree with you that they probably didn't want him to look too good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. But everyone else is smiling in theirs......
Edited on Tue May-23-06 12:19 PM by FrenchieCat
Wes Clark is in mid-sentence.

You'd think that they'd have a Normal pic of him...considering that he appears on Fox maybe twice per week! LOL!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC