Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republicans Fraudulently Re-register Dems in OC, CA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LiviaOlivia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:32 PM
Original message
Republicans Fraudulently Re-register Dems in OC, CA
Republicans Fraudulently Re-register Dems in OC, CA
by bajadudes
Tue May 23, 2006 at 10:43:11 AM PDT
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/5/23/134311/606

Just got this a few mins ago:

Can you smell 'disenfranchisement' in the air off of Huntington Beach? Well, I can! Here's the dirt straight from my inbox ---
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This message was sent by your Democracy for America - Orange County organizer, Susan Kopicki.

Dear DFA-OC Member,
Please read the press release below from the Orange County Democratic Party. Hundreds, maybe thousands, of OC Democrats have been fraudulently switched to Republican registration and the Registrar of Voters is avoiding fixing the problem, a problem that could disenfranchise hundreds or thousands of OC Democrats on June 6.

Attend the press conference if possible.
Thanks,
DFA-OC
Melahat Rafiei
Susan Kopicki



Press Release

Victims of Republican Voter Registration fraud must be contacted before the June 6, 2006 Primary election.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact Susan Freeze (714)
835-2122

200 N. Main Street Santa Ana CA 92701

SANTA ANA, CA Frank Barbaro, Chair of the Democratic Party of Orange County will conduct a press conference at 8am on Thursday, May 25, 2006 at the Orange County Registrar of Voters 1300 S. Grand Avenue in front of Building C to address the probable disenfranchisement of hundreds and possibly thousands of Orange County voters who were tricked, bullied or fraudulently registered by bounty hunters hired by the Republican Party of Orange County and the Republican Party of California between the months of September, 2005 and February, 2006. "From an estimated 3,500 questionable affidavits, the Orange County Register contacted 134 of them and found that 112 of the134 (83%) were fraudulently switched to Republican between December 2005 and February 2006 without their knowledge. I do not know why the Orange County Registrar of Voters cannot contact these voters and repair the damage", said Frank Barbaro, Chair of the Democratic Party of Orange County. "This is a potential disaster on election day. I am particularly concerned with the 34th Senate, 69th Assembly and 40th Congressional races." "I believe the Orange County Registrar of Voters needs to act immediately to locate and rectify these fraudulent changes. They have known about this for 8 weeks and have done nothing. We are forwarding about 10 complaints a day to the Registrar and Secretary of State that we have found in our registration effort."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. well they should be, I can not even imagine how much BS corruption
is hidden away in their offices
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wonder
if that group of bounty hunters is the same company who threw away all those Dem registrations in Las Vegas.

Hey, whatever happened to those guys? That was a Federal Felony.
:hi: Melahat :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It would have been a felony if it benefited Dems.
But because it's the republicans who did it you know this just quietly died and fell down the memory hole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't imagine that this is a high priority for the registrar there.
The fraud they are claiming is absolutely true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. OC Democrtatic Party has been
on this since January - NOBODY registers 3500 new voters in December! I don't care how good you are or what you are being paid.

Woo-hoo that's my DFA group - BTW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windy252 Donating Member (742 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. At least the local party is paying attention.
That a bit of a silver lining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Oh yes, a complaint against the OC rethuglican
party was filed in March w/ the SoS but since mcpherson is a rethug appointment, I expect it 2 go no where before November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArbustoBuster Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. I honestly think there's only one thing that will stop this kind...
Edited on Tue May-23-06 04:00 PM by ArbustoBuster
...of corruption. The death penalty for knowingly interfering with a citizen's right to vote. (Or, if you're one of the many people who have quite understandable problems with the death penalty, life in prison without the possibility of parole.) The Republicans don't seem to have any ethics nor even a basic sense of decency and fair play. They only seem to understand personal fear. And a law making it viciously dangerous to take away someone's right to vote might scare them off.

If nothing else, it would clear out a lot of corrupt Republicans at the county and state level before they get to turn into the Karl Roves of the mid-twenty-first century.

Wow, I'm getting really angry lately...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Welcome to the 'really angry' club.
Being used as a doormat by the rethugs and being ignored by party reps & senators will do that 2 you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. I'm with you.
mandatory sentence of 5 years would do it.
let's get a senator to sponsor it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
10. So what's new?
This is simply their M.O., a time-honored tradition in the Republican Party of winning at any cost. The Dems must remain ever-vigilant and expose and correct the dirty tricks. And I'm po'd enough to consider pulling some of our own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
banana republican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. My 1959 Civics teacher said
it's Ballots or Bullets....

Looks like the Pukes have made their choice...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. Same song, eighteenth verse ... just another form of vore theft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. Hmm
I am in the 40th congressional district the press release mentioned. I have been a registered dem scince the '04 primaries and have not knowingly re-registered scince so I don't think I am affected. I wonder what makes him particularly worried about this race?

Here are the Current Contenders:

Republican Congressman Edward R. "Ed" Royce (as candidate)
• First elected: 1992
• Seat up for election: Tuesday 7 November 2006
• Renominated - 6 June 2006 Primary
• FEC: $1,026,298

Democratic PRIMARY June 6:
Christina Avalos
• FEC finanical report not available
Florice Orea Hoffman
• FEC: $77,846

Libertarian Philip H. Inman
• FEC finanical report not available
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. If you signed ANY petition between
October and the end of December, 05 - then you more than likely 'signed' a voter registration form. The petitions require your signature, printed name and address. Then the bounty hunters had people sign on a second line 2 'verify' their signature. The 2nd signature was a signature on a voter registration form - the signature line was visible, the rest of the registration form was not. After wards the hunter took the addresses off the petitions made up driver's license numbers, and registered the petition signer as a rethuglican.

A voter registration form is not valid w/o a signature which is why they had people sign in two places...So if YOU signed a petition for pre-K education in October, November or December, 2005, you are most likely registered as a rethuglican.

go here - call - contact:
http://www.oc.ca.gov/ELECTION/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. I wonder if this is related to the newer "voter verification" BS...
... that McPherson puts in that has tons of false failures when folks' driver's license data doesn't match what's in their voter registration data.

This is only now affecting new voters. One might argue that that statistically that might be affecting both parties equally amongst new voters, though perhaps newer voters (especially those that might not have been "warned" ahead of time to ensure that they used their DMV data when registering to vote, like certain Republican groups aware of McPherson's plan might have advised them to do). 26% voters have been thrown out statewide and as many as 43% of newer voters in L.A.

Now, if you suddenly decide to "re-register" existing registered Dems as Republicans, even if you get caught and are forced to cancel these registrations, if they are then forced to "reregister" as Dems again, then they could get caught in this new registeration verification SNAFU moreso than other voters that haven't been "re-registered", therefore causing a greater imbalance of Democratic disenfranchised voters.

In any case I sense a Katherine Harris style voter fraud scheme going on here that could be used to fix some elections down here. Democrats should DEMAND that they shouldn't have to be "re-registered" back as Dems again, forcing them to go through the newer voter registration SNAFUs. The old data of them being registered should be restored without any purging AT ALL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catzies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
16. It happened to my daughter in 1998 in Ventura County (north of LA)
She registered as a Dem & when we went to vote she was on the rolls as a Repub & we had to re-register her. It was NOT our mistake -- I'm certain someone switched it but I can't prove it.

Ventura County is red, BTW. "Reagan Country." :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Not for long, Catzies my dear
Not for Long............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catzies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Yessir, Capn sir and good to see you! Workin' hard up here, how about you?
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
17. Here in Pa. you must vote your registered party in the primary. Is
that the case in CA? If so, I foresee major problems on June 6 - all to the benefit of the pukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. no, California is an open primary - it was voted on a few
years ago. If you are party registered, that is the ballot you are mailed or given @ the polls. If you are 'declined to state', you may request any party ballot you want, but the parties consider it a 'provisional ballot' unless there is a dispute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-24-06 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. Pa. sucks. If you are an Independent, or anything other than
a D or R, no vote in primary unless you have a candidate for your party running. State legislators have no interest in changing this either.

Thanks for the info on CA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
18. This has been going on for YEARS here
and our illustrious head of the County Office of Elections does NOTHING, though we've notified them countless times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arikara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-23-06 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
23. I'm really confused by your system
Why can't you vote for whoever you want? Why you have to register with a party to vote? What's the point of even having a secret ballot then?

In Canada, we just show up on election day and give our name. We don't get asked for ID. If we aren't registered, it is taken care of right there; although you do need ID if you aren't registered.

I wound up donating to 2 different parties in the course of the election year and they each sent me membership cards. I could have voted for a completely different party if I had wanted. Nobody would dare ask to see a party affiliation at the voting place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC