How will the GOP muddy the waters for the Hastert Scandal and what ...

[European Socialist]

method will the Democrats use to enable them to get away with it? It's Ground Hog day.

[rpannier]

1. Muddy the waters??? Why bother

Everyone knows the scandals are bi-partisan. Haven't you been watching faux news and msnbc?

[ShockediSay]

2. Interesting that more Repugs took offense at the search

of Jefferson's congressional offices (maybe that's where repugs stash the cash)

anyway, speech and debate clause doesn't cover "funding," imho.

[AlinPA]

3. The GOP does not have to worry. FBI & DOJ is controlled by the AG. nt

[Dr.Phool]

4. Yeah, noticed Dana Milbank on msrnc tonight

Trot out the same horseshit "The Democrats have their contacts with Abramoff and his clients" on K.O.

[acmejack]

5. Yes indeed the Democrats have just as many problems of their own!

More on that after this word from our sponsor extorco...

[KansDem]

6. They'll blame it on Clinton

Dennis Hastert is a member of the United States Congress;
Bill Clinton was President of the United States.

There's your connection...

[radfringe]

7. the waters are already muddy

with the exception of the ABC news story - the blather heads are focused on whether or not the FBI can use a LEGAL WARRANT to raid a congressional office

that many members of congress are "upset" by this doesn't indicate a sudden attack of concern for privacy rights -- where was the bi-partisan screaming when the NSA story broke? Instead the blather was "if you have nothing to hide - you have nothing to fear"

wellllll? if congress has nothing to hide - why are they so upset over a LEGAL WARRANT?

the REAL STORY is what is in those documents - who else does it implicate in which scandal? This is what congress fears.

forget about a frog march - if things move quickly on this - the summer will be featuring a frog parade