joemurphy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 09:41 PM
Original message |
Why was there so little opposition from Democrats to Hayden? |
|
The Republicans are self-destructing, but that doesn't mean we should abandon our principles.
|
marmar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 09:42 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Mike Malloy is blowing a gasket about that as we speak... |
Eric J in MN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 09:42 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) implied she would only vote for Hayden if he |
|
left the military, then voted for him without him leaving the military.
|
marmar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. DINOanne? No surprise there. |
atreides1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
8. Her husband needed those government contracts |
|
Besides who can afford a 1.6 million dollar house on a Senators' salary?
|
Daphne08
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
17. DiFi needs to go! n/t |
Ilsa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
24. She really blew it, IMO. She is no longer trustworthy as far as |
|
her word is concerned because of this.
|
leesa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
38. She also spoke out against illegal wiretapping and then voted for the |
|
primary architect. She is a whore for the corporations and for Israel. She is rich and intends to get richer and stay that way. She agrees 100% with everything Dubya does.
|
atreides1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 09:43 PM
Response to Original message |
|
They're keeping their powder dry, for something more important.
|
Psephos
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 09:44 PM
Response to Original message |
4. As a practical matter, who would have we gotten instead? |
|
I think a lot of Dems are saying the lesser of two evils here.
Peace.
|
atreides1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
13. How is he the lesser of two evils |
|
He's in "Death Squad" John's pocket and his umbilical cord is right up Rummy's ass. The first time that a slick White House lawyer tells him it's perfectly okay to assasinate American citizens, because the president has that right, he'll fold just like he did with the NSA wiretapping.
This man has the capability of being the next Heydrich to Negroponte's Himmler!!!!!
|
Psephos
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
32. I wasn't taking a position here, just answering the question |
|
Seriously, though, who do you think they're going to nominate? Someone from the left? That's why we need to win the White House in 2008.
The Heydrich/Himmler stuff has got to go, btw. The repugs are people with different politics than ours, not Nazis. It does us no good to call every last one of them Satanic. Maybe you can show me an example where that kind of demonization talk leads to good?
Peace.
|
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 09:45 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
Jim Sagle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
10. Excuse you? This is NOT the Maoist Underground. |
|
Edited on Fri May-26-06 09:47 PM by Jim Sagle
|
Beelzebud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. The ones that voted FOR the spy chief of the NSA ARE fascists. |
Jim Sagle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
The Dems who voted for Hayden are obviously not fascists. They're yellow.
|
Beelzebud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. Fascism relies on the weak to get their job done. |
Jim Sagle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
23. Yes, they're enablers. Just trying to be precise - |
|
for all the good that does any of us. ;(
|
Beelzebud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
30. Agreed. That is the saddest part. They enable.... |
|
I didn't mean to jump down your throat... I'm sorry for that.
I think we both agree. Without their enabling, the fascists couldn't win.
|
AndyTiedye
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 09:45 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Because the NSA Has Been Monitoring Them All for Almost 6 Years |
Doctor_J
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 09:46 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Because they don't represent the people ,and are nearly invincible |
|
Look at Fineswine in California. She's one of Smirk's enablers, from a very blue state. Tell me what the chances are of unseating her with a Boxer-like Dem. Zilch
|
spindrifter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 09:48 PM
Response to Original message |
11. There are several things |
|
going on--saving for when they need to pull out all stops; some of the original arguments have not held up--i.e., he's military--when in reality there have been other military persons who were CIA head, there will be a huge constitutional battle brewing over all of the NSA/spying issues and they don't really have to do with Hayden the man.
|
Stinky The Clown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
16. Not arguing here ...... but what 'several things' are going on? |
spindrifter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
19. Not taking it as an argument, |
|
1) discredited early arguments 2) impending constitutional battle 3) Hayden the man
|
atreides1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
18. Hayden is in it up to his eyebrows |
|
One little bit of history for you, it's been almost 25 years since the last CIA director was still in uniform. Hayden the man let some slick White House lawyer convince him that wire taps without warrants were just fine, because George said they were, not exactly a great picture of someone concerned about upholding his oath to the Constitution. With that in mind, how much will his word actually be worth when he gets sworn in as the CIA director?
Hayden, Negroponte, Gonzales, and Bush are all part of the NSA/spying issue.
|
spindrifter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
|
word of any "spook" worth? The very nature of the job is dissimulation.
|
blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 10:03 PM
Response to Original message |
21. Actually, Feingold and Kerry did speak out publicly against confirmation |
|
Edited on Fri May-26-06 10:03 PM by blm
making highly charged comments against Hayden and I am surprised that others weren't moved to do the same. But, then the media does its thing.
Whenever the media can keep the heat down enough, and not give much airtime to the dissent, they get to shape the debate for the vote.
|
LincolnMcGrath
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 10:03 PM
Response to Original message |
22. Keeping their powder dry? |
joemurphy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 10:08 PM
Response to Original message |
25. Acquiescing in his appointment is one thing... |
|
The Republicans had the votes to get him through, I suppose. But why a Democrat would vote FOR Hayden baffles me. This guy was running a warrantless wiretapping program avoiding the FISA courts for no reason and then gathering intelligence on the phoning patterns of millions of U.S. citizens.
Maybe he was being a good soldier. But we obviously need someone running the CIA with a tad bit of spine. Tenet didn't have any and we got the Iraq War. Why should a Dem vote for another invertebrate?
|
IndianaGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
27. Lieberman and Biden voted for Hayden |
|
Well known DLCers Bayh and Hillary voted against Hayden. Why didn't all the other Democrats vote against Hayden? I understand Lieberman's vote, he will never go against Bush. Biden is just a clueless imperialist without Joementum's real hair.
|
joemurphy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
28. Levin and Leahy's votes are harder for me to figure. n/t |
Vidar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-27-06 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
40. Those were bitter pills to swallow. |
marmar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 10:12 PM
Response to Original message |
26. Here are the "no" voters: |
|
NAYs ---15 Bayh (D-IN) Cantwell (D-WA) Clinton (D-NY) Dayton (D-MN) Dodd (D-CT) Dorgan (D-ND) Durbin (D-IL) Feingold (D-WI) Harkin (D-IA) Kennedy (D-MA) Kerry (D-MA) Menendez (D-NJ) Obama (D-IL) Specter (R-PA) Wyden (D-OR)
|
tulip
(344 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
|
:)
Glad to see that there are still some Democrats with their constituants in mind.
|
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
37. one question did specter vote |
|
No on another thread here, they said spector voted for Hayden.
|
Olney Blue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 10:20 PM
Response to Original message |
29. These are the senators voting Nay (spector was a protest vote) |
|
NAYs --- 15 Bayh (D-IN) Cantwell (D-WA) Clinton (D-NY) Dayton (D-MN) Dodd (D-CT) Dorgan (D-ND) Durbin (D-IL) Feingold (D-WI) Harkin (D-IA) Kennedy (D-MA) Kerry (D-MA) Menendez (D-NJ) Obama (D-IL) Specter (R-PA) Wyden (D-OR)
|
shell5960v
(2 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 10:37 PM
Response to Original message |
31. I am so incredibly sick of this ..... |
|
Yes! Democrats are not acting on THIS (today, it is Hayden, but for the past 6 years, it has been many other things) -- they are "keeping their powder dry" for something IMPORTANT! BULLSHIT! They are scared rabbits -- I say, for starters, vote ALL out who voted FOR Hayden. Then go from there.
Who cares if they have a D behind their name rather than an R. ALL those who act like fascists (or support them) are Republicans. And they must ALL go.
|
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
|
now that is weird, like Mike Malloy just said we have no opposition party, everyone has to just "fall in line", sorry, I will not do it.
|
life_long_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
|
What is the shelf life of dry powder? LOL It must have expired, that's why they don't use it.
|
leesa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 11:03 PM
Response to Original message |
36. Because they are rich and they approve of Bush's dictatorial takeover |
|
Go Corporations!! Ask Diane Feinstein, who acknowledged the anti-constitutional tragedy of the illegal tapping and then proceeded to vote for its architect. They're making money, man.
|
jerry611
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri May-26-06 11:51 PM
Response to Original message |
39. Because Dems are just about as equally corrupt |
|
Both political parties are bought and paid for. Both are ran by rich white men.
|
Zhade
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-27-06 02:09 PM
Response to Original message |
41. Why was there so little German Democratic opposition to Hitler? |
Clarkie1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-27-06 11:07 PM
Response to Original message |
42. I think some saw him as an experienced, capable administrator. |
|
Who would do a better job of running the CIA. Feinstein said there are very few people in the world capable of running the CIA effectively. I don't know if that's true or not, but I think that's why some Dems voted for him. They saw him as the best choice under the circumstances.
And, we can still have our congressional investigations on illegal wiretapping once we retake the congress. Hayden was advised by Gonzales and others the program was legal when he carried it out, and that's where the focus of the investigation should be...the higher-ups. We really do need an investigation resolve the issue.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:28 PM
Response to Original message |