Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why was there so little opposition from Democrats to Hayden?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 09:41 PM
Original message
Why was there so little opposition from Democrats to Hayden?
The Republicans are self-destructing, but that doesn't mean we should abandon our principles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Mike Malloy is blowing a gasket about that as we speak...
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) implied she would only vote for Hayden if he
left the military, then voted for him without him leaving the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. DINOanne? No surprise there.
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Her husband needed those government contracts
Besides who can afford a 1.6 million dollar house on a Senators' salary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daphne08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. DiFi needs to go! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
24. She really blew it, IMO. She is no longer trustworthy as far as
her word is concerned because of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
38. She also spoke out against illegal wiretapping and then voted for the
primary architect. She is a whore for the corporations and for Israel. She is rich and intends to get richer and stay that way. She agrees 100% with everything Dubya does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Haven't you heard
They're keeping their powder dry, for something more important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. As a practical matter, who would have we gotten instead?
I think a lot of Dems are saying the lesser of two evils here.

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. How is he the lesser of two evils
He's in "Death Squad" John's pocket and his umbilical cord is right up Rummy's ass. The first time that a slick White House lawyer tells him it's perfectly okay to assasinate American citizens, because the president has that right, he'll fold just like he did with the NSA wiretapping.

This man has the capability of being the next Heydrich to Negroponte's Himmler!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
32. I wasn't taking a position here, just answering the question
Seriously, though, who do you think they're going to nominate? Someone from the left? That's why we need to win the White House in 2008.

The Heydrich/Himmler stuff has got to go, btw. The repugs are people with different politics than ours, not Nazis. It does us no good to call every last one of them Satanic. Maybe you can show me an example where that kind of demonization talk leads to good?

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Excuse you? This is NOT the Maoist Underground.
Edited on Fri May-26-06 09:47 PM by Jim Sagle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. The ones that voted FOR the spy chief of the NSA ARE fascists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Simplify much?
The Dems who voted for Hayden are obviously not fascists. They're yellow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Fascism relies on the weak to get their job done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. Yes, they're enablers. Just trying to be precise -
for all the good that does any of us. ;(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. Agreed. That is the saddest part. They enable....
I didn't mean to jump down your throat... I'm sorry for that.

I think we both agree. Without their enabling, the fascists couldn't win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. Because the NSA Has Been Monitoring Them All for Almost 6 Years

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. Because they don't represent the people ,and are nearly invincible
Look at Fineswine in California. She's one of Smirk's enablers, from a very blue state. Tell me what the chances are of unseating her with a Boxer-like Dem. Zilch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. There are several things
going on--saving for when they need to pull out all stops; some of the original arguments have not held up--i.e., he's military--when in reality there have been other military persons who were CIA head, there will be a huge constitutional battle brewing over all of the NSA/spying issues and they don't really have to do with Hayden the man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Not arguing here ...... but what 'several things' are going on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Not taking it as an argument,
1) discredited early arguments
2) impending constitutional battle
3) Hayden the man
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Hayden is in it up to his eyebrows
One little bit of history for you, it's been almost 25 years since the last CIA director was still in uniform. Hayden the man let some slick White House lawyer convince him that wire taps without warrants were just fine, because George said they were, not exactly a great picture of someone concerned about upholding his oath to the Constitution. With that in mind, how much will his word actually be worth when he gets sworn in as the CIA director?

Hayden, Negroponte, Gonzales, and Bush are all part of the NSA/spying issue.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. How much is the
word of any "spook" worth? The very nature of the job is dissimulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
21. Actually, Feingold and Kerry did speak out publicly against confirmation
Edited on Fri May-26-06 10:03 PM by blm
making highly charged comments against Hayden and I am surprised that others weren't moved to do the same. But, then the media does its thing.

Whenever the media can keep the heat down enough, and not give much airtime to the dissent, they get to shape the debate for the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LincolnMcGrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
22. Keeping their powder dry?
still
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
25. Acquiescing in his appointment is one thing...
The Republicans had the votes to get him through, I suppose. But why a Democrat would vote FOR Hayden baffles me. This guy was running a warrantless wiretapping program avoiding the FISA courts for no reason and then gathering intelligence on the phoning patterns of millions of U.S. citizens.

Maybe he was being a good soldier. But we obviously need someone running the CIA with a tad bit of spine. Tenet didn't have any and we got the Iraq War. Why should a Dem vote for another invertebrate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Lieberman and Biden voted for Hayden
Well known DLCers Bayh and Hillary voted against Hayden. Why didn't all the other Democrats vote against Hayden? I understand Lieberman's vote, he will never go against Bush. Biden is just a clueless imperialist without Joementum's real hair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Levin and Leahy's votes are harder for me to figure. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #28
40. Those were bitter pills to swallow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
26. Here are the "no" voters:
NAYs ---15
Bayh (D-IN)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Clinton (D-NY)
Dayton (D-MN)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feingold (D-WI)
Harkin (D-IA)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Kerry (D-MA)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Obama (D-IL)
Specter (R-PA)
Wyden (D-OR)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tulip Donating Member (344 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. All my favorites!
:)

Glad to see that there are still some Democrats with their constituants in mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #26
37. one question did specter vote
No on another thread here, they said spector voted for Hayden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
29. These are the senators voting Nay (spector was a protest vote)
NAYs --- 15
Bayh (D-IN)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Clinton (D-NY)
Dayton (D-MN)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feingold (D-WI)
Harkin (D-IA)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Kerry (D-MA)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Obama (D-IL)
Specter (R-PA)
Wyden (D-OR)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shell5960v Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
31. I am so incredibly sick of this .....
Yes! Democrats are not acting on THIS (today, it is Hayden, but for the past 6 years, it has been many other things) -- they are "keeping their powder dry" for something IMPORTANT! BULLSHIT! They are scared rabbits -- I say, for starters, vote ALL out who voted FOR Hayden. Then go from there.

Who cares if they have a D behind their name rather than an R. ALL those who act like fascists (or support them) are Republicans. And they must ALL go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Specter voted NO
now that is weird, like Mike Malloy just said we have no opposition party, everyone has to just "fall in line", sorry, I will not do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
life_long_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Welcome to DU...
What is the shelf life of dry powder? LOL
It must have expired, that's why they don't use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
36. Because they are rich and they approve of Bush's dictatorial takeover
Go Corporations!! Ask Diane Feinstein, who acknowledged the anti-constitutional tragedy of the illegal tapping and then proceeded to vote for its architect. They're making money, man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jerry611 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-26-06 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
39. Because Dems are just about as equally corrupt
Both political parties are bought and paid for. Both are ran by rich white men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
41. Why was there so little German Democratic opposition to Hitler?
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
42. I think some saw him as an experienced, capable administrator.
Who would do a better job of running the CIA. Feinstein said there are very few people in the world capable of running the CIA effectively. I don't know if that's true or not, but I think that's why some Dems voted for him. They saw him as the best choice under the circumstances.

And, we can still have our congressional investigations on illegal wiretapping once we retake the congress. Hayden was advised by Gonzales and others the program was legal when he carried it out, and that's where the focus of the investigation should be...the higher-ups. We really do need an investigation resolve the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC