Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Elite Senate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 07:33 AM
Original message
The Elite Senate
They are not a body of the people. It really doesn't matter which Party they belong to. They are mostly millionaires, including the Democrats. Most of the Senate are supportive of Big Business and corporations. They are not for the "little guy". And we wonder why most of them were supportive of General Hayden, the Spymaster? Because they are not concerned about your rights. They are concerned about their own interests, which mostly translates into their own wealth.

There are a few that have some idealistic viewpoint of the Senate as a deliberative body. They are really there to stop the House from legislating the true interests of the people. I don't know how else to define them except as "elitists".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Totallybushed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. I agree with you 80%
They are elite. They do watch out for the business interests rather than those of the people. Their true function, which is often abused, is to make sure the House, in representing the people's interest, has thought out their bills. In other words, just because the people want it now, does not necessarily mean that they should get it now. To establish some stability in society, not prone to every political wind that blows.

But human beings, being human beings, careerists and opportunists will eventually take control of even the most noble institutions. And that is what has happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah, that's what they claim...
and I used to believe it. No more. The Senate, it seems to me, is a conspiracy against the American people - their needs, their wishes, their freedoms. They are not what they seem or claim to be, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. The House is even less of a body of the people than the Senate
No longer do voters choose their congressmen. Congressmen choose their voters. Leadership rules the House with an iron fist and individual members do not have the power to adequately fight for the constituents' agenda. The senate is tainted as well, but at least it is a body where more than one voice can at least have some bearing on the outcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Today, the Senate is more like the House on Viagra
and Xanax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. No doubt about it
they are treated with extreme deference - pretty much every business and employee involved in their lives will do whatever it takes to smooth over the glitches of everyday life. Make no mistake, they will do whatever it takes to be reelected. They are this country's royalty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. the House membership isn't much better . . .
it too is filled with elitists, and many millionaires . . . somewhat more diverse than the Senate due to its size, but equally unable to represent the true interests of "We the People" over those of their corporate sponsors . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-27-06 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. Jeff Greenfield gave a short history lesson
on this the other day. He said something to the effect that the Senate is not representative of the people but rather of ? (corporations??). I was only walking by and missed most of it. He said something to the effect that the House was the one that more represented the people. I told my daughter about this that day and wished I'd teevo'd it. Anyone else hear this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC