Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chris Bowers and Digby GO AT...the Southern "I.D" and why it Matters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-28-06 07:25 PM
Original message
Chris Bowers and Digby GO AT...the Southern "I.D" and why it Matters
Edited on Sun May-28-06 07:51 PM by KoKo01
Includes an "interesting" Merle Haggard song...which includes "My Ole Hag" (DU Females Unite) but the article is interesting for those of us Southern DU'ers who are HORRIFIED with what we see going on there...and those who think Haggard "got it right."
Here's the Map of Baptist's in the South:


Here's the post:

-----------------------------------


Cultural ID

by digby

Chris Bowers writes about one of my favorite subjects today: American tribal identity.
(Bower's full article here:)
http://www.mydd.com/story/2006/5/26/111915/503

Over the past year and a half, I have slowly developed an argument that the electorate is, in general, non-ideological, not interested in policy, and generally unmoved by the day-to-day minutia of political events that, within the blogosphere, are treated as cataclysmic events. Sure, most people hold general political beliefs, but in general national voting habits are motivated by something else--something more basic. As we look for ways to motivate voters in November, we need to remember the powerful role that identity plays in political decision-making. As progressives, we shrug off concepts such as the "battle of civilizations," but if you look closely at demographic data, maybe it is a battle of civilizations taking place after all. We may very well be living in an era of identity politics. Who knows, maybe every era of American politics is an era of identity politics.

Gretchen Wilson and Merle Haggard's song "Politically Uncorrect" perfectly captures the sense of exceptionalism and specialness of southern culture:

I'm for the low man on the totem pole
And I'm for the underdog God bless his soul
And I'm for the guys still pulling third shift
And the single mom raisin' her kids
I'm for the preachers who stay on their knees
And I'm for the sinner who finally believes
And I'm for the farmer with dirt on his hands
And the soldiers who fight for this land

Chorus:

And I'm for the Bible and I'm for the flag
And I'm for the working man, me and ol' hag
I'm just one of many
Who can't get no respect
Politically uncorrect

(Merle Haggard)
I guess my opinion is all out of style
(Gretchen Wilson)
Aw, but don't get me started cause I can get riled
And I'll make a fight for the forefathers plan
(Merle Haggard)
And the world already knows where I stand

Repeat Chorus

(Merle Haggard)
Nothing wrong with the Bible, nothing wrong with the flag
(Gretchen Wilson)
Nothing wrong with the working man me & ol' hag
We're just some of many who can't get no respect
Politically uncorrect
(Merle Haggard)


Much more of Digby's view about this here...a GREAT READ!

http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-28-06 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. I just Edited my post to add the Map of the Baptist America...I love
Edited on Sun May-28-06 08:00 PM by KoKo01
some Baptists...not a smear on your religion. One of our largest Baptist Churches had congregation at a NC Peace Demonstration....but the map is interesting to see that "red state America." Those outside the South need to know that "Baptists have SPLIT in the SOUTH" so this is just a map to show how a religion has grown. And, those Baptists should be Proud of this for their Power... (Qualifier: I'm an Episcopalian whose once Southern Coastal dominance has diminished....I guess we just didn't have the "message" that folks wanted to hear. :-(
and I can understand why)

But, that "religious values" have been taken over by one sect...

What does it mean for the rest of us? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-29-06 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Gotta give...one more kick to this. Please visit the linked site for the
MAP which has disappeared from my post but is very revealing and only a "click away" if one bothers to "click the link" I gave.

Thanks...please read...it's very interesting whether you agree or disagree...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reality based Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-28-06 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. People have to be given a reason to identify with a particular party
Ideological education has been in the hands of the movies, popular songs, churches, corporate media, and football coaches. Ideology isn't absorbed by osmosis. There hasn't been any effective articulation of liberalism by politicians since the passing of Hubert Humphrey. There has been a remarkable movement of racial attitudes in the south during my lifetime but the class consciousness that was present as a result of the Great Depression and agrarian populism has eroded seriously. It isn't tribal identity, it's unanswered, catapulted propaganda that has taken the south away from the Democratic Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-28-06 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes...what you say is what I've seen having moved away and come back...
Quote from your post:

There has been a remarkable movement of racial attitudes in the south during my lifetime but the class consciousness that was present as a result of the Great Depression and agrarian populism has eroded seriously.

I assume you mean that the "class consciousness" has remained and that the "Dominant Class" that I remember many years ago still survives and THRIVES under Bush...and that most Southerners are still unaware of how Class has RULED THEM for Decades...well over two Centuries? :shrug: Is that what you meant?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reality based Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-29-06 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. There was a time when the south sent economic liberals
to Congress in substantial numbers. The New Deal and its successor "deals" relied heavily upon people like Sam Rayburn of Texas or Claude Pepper of Florida. Their liberalism was derived from white populist agrarian roots of the post civil war south and from the radicalizing experience of the Great Depression. (That did not mean that an upper class did not dominate much of southern society and as it did and does elsewhere.) As they moved to the cities, however, southerners became separated from that experience. Unions were weaker than elsewhere, higher education was less prestigious, churches were not as dedicated to the social gospel, old money was less concerned with public service, racism and the confederate tradition provided a means to split the progressive vote. Industry, the growing urban middle classes and new money often allied themselves with old money interests and racists to challenge the Democratic Party establishments. The religious right entered the scene in the latter part of the 20th Century to deliver the urban white lower middle classes and the rural areas to the Republican Party. The Democratic Party in the South has yet to develop a coherent narrative to counter that development. That doesn't mean that it can't be done. The religious right should not be conceded the Christian vote. There are plenty of Southern populist Christians and lots of sin in the Republican camp to take advantage of. An aggressive opposition like that which Governor Dean seems (or seemed) ready to promote would rally significant Democratic votes at least in some southern states. There are cultural (tribal?) issues to overcome, certainly-- most notable is the latent racism in our hearts. That probably means that for the immediate future Democrats should look elsewhere for their national Presidential majority if possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-29-06 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. "Can't get no respect"
I don't know what country Haggard is living in, but it sure isn't the United States. If a national politician doesn't kiss the South's ass, he or she can forget about getting elected. Mind you, I'm not just saying a politician has to acknowledge the South, but actually has to embrace Southernism. If a politician shrugs and says of (for example) NASCAR, "to each his own," that politician is done for. You have to love NASCAR, and be ready to rattle off names, race results and current point standings, or you're nothing. The South will not vote for you, no Southern state will go in your column on election day.

"Can't get no respect"? What kind of bullshit is that? Would any national politician kiss off all of the Northeast or the Midwest for not liking la crosse or hockey? Would any national politician forget about the West if he didn't know squat-ah about the national forests? Not a chance. But if you don't have your lips firmly on the South's ass, forget about any electoral votes from that side of the Mason-Dixon line.

And Haggard's song is just more of the same. If you don't genuflect when it's played, Southerners will use it as an excuse to vote for the other candidate in droves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-29-06 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thanks for posting this
This is a must read IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC