Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Report from Marcy Winograd-Jane Harman candidate forum last night

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 11:00 AM
Original message
Report from Marcy Winograd-Jane Harman candidate forum last night
Edited on Wed May-31-06 11:01 AM by coalition_unwilling
The West Los Angeles Democratic Club hosted a candidate forum last night whose featured speakers were primary opponents Marcy Winograd and Jane Harman. Both are competing for the Democratic nomination for the 36th Congressional District in the June 6 California primary election (one week from yesterday).

An overflow crowd filled the Venice Methodist Church last night at 7 p.m. Although I was not there in any official capacity, I did make several observations. First, each candidate spoke for about 10 minutes, followed by a set of questions previously submitted by audience members.

Harman trotted out her standard lines on war in Iraq and warrantless wiretapping. Her responses were greeted by tepid applause and sullen silences. Winograd supporters far outnumbered Harman supporters, as was evident as soon as Winograd took the stage. Winograd's remarks, especially with regard to the war in Iraq (she favors a policy of immediate dis-engagement) and warrantless wiretapping (she favors impeachment) were interrupted frequently by thunderous applause from the audience.

Most people in the district put the race as "too close to call" right now. It will all depend on turnout, as is so often the case in primary elections. Judging from last night, however, I would have to say that Harman is in real trouble in her district.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wow -thanks
I had no idea this challenge had picked up steam. That's amazing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Winograd is winning the sign wars too.
It is amazing in West LA how many Marcy supporters there are. That may be offset by those further south of that area where the oil refinery and the ports are. It will depend on who shows up to vote. Not in that district personally, but it is interesting driving through and seeing the Winograd signs very proudly displayed. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Not just "winning" the sign wars but illustrating the
character of the race this year. In Palms and Mar Vista where I have regularly walked precincts for Marcy, you will see many Winograd signs on private residential lawns and I have yet to see a single Harman sign on a residential lawn.

Harman's signs are mostly posted on empty lots up and down the major thoroughfares (like Venice Blvd.) Even there, however, Winograd signs are just as prominent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. Let's hope it's a case of Jane-mentum at work!
Edited on Wed May-31-06 11:54 AM by Totally Committed
She's another one that needs to go. NOW.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Here are some more details on this race-
A snip from a Wingrad piece at MyDD (the whole thing is compelling)>

President of Progressive Democrats of Los Angeles, I am running to replace pro-war incumbent Jane Harman in California's 36th Congressional District. I run with a great sense of urgency, for we stand on the precipice of losing our democracy, of sinking a trillion-dollars into Iraq, of launching another war in Iran, of developing over 100 new nuclear bombs each year, and of shredding the Constitution. Everywhere I travel in the 36th District, a 30-mile urban stretch from San Pedro up through Venice and Mar Vista, a district where Democrats outnumber Republicans by 40,000 votes, people stop me in the street, in elevators, at meetings to ask, "Where are the Democrats? Why aren't they speaking out?"

I assure them this Democrat, Marcy Winograd, is speaking out passionately, challenging the leadership of the Democratic Party to stand for the possibility of peace, for the rule of law, and for a brighter day when we reject pre-emptive war and, instead, engage the world community in tackling illiteracy, AIDS, and poverty, all the while engaging our own citizens in redefining security as universal affordable health care, quality education to close the achievement gap, and environmental protection to cool the threat of global warming.

Some ask, "Have you ever been elected to office?" and I tell them, "No, isn't that great? I have no investment in the status quo, in the power of the Beltway." Quite the contrary. I have spent the last three years on the ground, knee deep in the grassroots, organizing town hall forums and congressional lobby delegations to end the US occupation of Iraq...........

http://www.mydd.com/story/2006/4/25/162621/101

FDL spotlights her today, too-

snip>
Harman is the Democratic incumbent from a safe Los Angeles seat who once proudly boasted that she is "the best Republican in the Democratic Party." Marcy Winograd is the real Democrat trying to oust her. It’s another California race, and it’s come crashing into the collective political consciousness in recent days.

This is a genuine insurgent campaign by progressive activist Marcy Winograd, a serious challenge — if not an affront — to entrenched Establishment Democrat Jane Harman (CA-36). This is like a smaller version of Ned Lamont’s valiant campaign to dislodge Bush’s favorite Democrat, Joe Lieberman in Connecticut. And unless you’re a Zell Miller/Joe Lieberman type of make-believe Democrat, Jane Harman is probably not someone you want to see re-elected to Congress from the safely blue seat which runs from San Pedro to Redondo Beach to Venice.

Although Joe Lieberman might debate her on her claim to be the best Republican in the Democratic Party, her voting record is even more reactionary and more rubber-stamp Bush than even his. The multi-millionaire Harman is a hawk on Iraq and supports Bush on the disastrous occupation. Not coincidentally, almost every one of her big campaign contrbutors are arms merchants. She voted for the Constitution-shredding "Patriot Act" twice (she was one of just two House Democrats to back the administration’s efforts to monitor the records of public libraries when the Patriot Act came up for reauthorization) and she was one of only four Democrats briefed on Bush’s illegal warrantless domestic spying program. (Tellingly, when that program was finally revealed by the NEW YORK TIMES, Harman expressed outrage… not at the Bush Regime, of course, but at the TIMES, for making the American people aware of what she, Bush and other anti-democratic traitors were doing in secret.)

Let me repeat, this is a safe Democratic seat, gerrymandered by Democrats for a Democrat. Bush got his wimpy ass kicked by Kerry 60/40 in 2004 and the Republicans, perfectly content to keep their pal Harman in the seat, have a pathetic challenger sacrificial lamb named Brian Gibson who hasn’t even bothered to put up a website. (He naps a lot and is said to be hoping for a Republican tsunami of support for Bush to defeat all Democrats in California and place him in Congress.) Of course for us, there is a far more palatable way to get rid of the odious Harman.............

http://www.firedoglake.com/2006/05/30/howie-kleins-blue-america-special-tuesday-edition-harmanwinograd-ca-36/




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-31-06 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. nice to see "DU's press corps" on the job
this is just great - here's yet another progressive who is NOT AN ISOLATIONIST ...

this will be a great seat to win back!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-02-06 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
6. Update: Winograd WINS the West L.A. Democratic Club
endorsement with about 77% of the votes cast. This despite a personal appearance by Harman on the night of the event.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC