BobcatJH
(504 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-12-06 03:18 PM
Original message |
|
So, Ann Coulter Republicans, not only is your hero an absolute hack, but she's also an absolute hack who couldn't even be an original absolute hack. Maybe she should have called her book "Attributionless: The Chuch of Plagiarism". From the Rude Pundit: Ann Coulter has a bad habit. And that habit, as mentioned before by the Rude Pundit (followed up by Raw Story), is that she appears to like to copy whole sentences from other sources without putting them in as quotes or even citing where she might have "paraphrased" from. You judge for yourself:
Here's Coulter from Chapter 1 of Godless: The massive Dickey-Lincoln Dam, a $227 million hydroelectric project proposed on upper St. John River in Maine, was halted by the discovery of the Furbish lousewort, a plant previously believed to be extinct.
Here's the Portland Press Herald, from the year 2000, in its list of the "Maine Stories of the Century": The massive Dickey-Lincoln Dam, a $227 million hydroelectric project proposed on upper St. John River, is halted by the discovery of the Furbish lousewort, a plant believed to be extinct.
Strangely similar, no? By the way, that's a story from 1976. Coulter doesn't tell you that little tidbit, making you think it happened last week. The next one's from 1977:
Here's Coulter writing about an attack on the Alaska pipeline: A few years after oil drilling began in Prudhoe Bay, Alaska, a saboteur set off an explosion blowing a hole in the pipeline and releasing an estimated 550,000 gallons of oil.
Here's something from the History Channel: The only major oil spill on land occurred when an unknown saboteur blew a hole in the pipe near Fairbanks, and 550,000 gallons of oil spilled onto the ground.
Why, in this age of the "terrorist," would Coulter use "saboteur," a quaint term, to be sure? Could it be a cut and paste job with a couple of words changed, like a good college freshman?
So you judge. Sure, it's just two incidents in a single chapter. But does it speak to other potential strange similarities throughout the book? Is it plagiarism? The Rude Pundit's not saying it is plagiarism, but he's not saying it's not. How harshly would Coulter judge a liberal writer for doing the same? Or would she have to be silent?
|
LiberalVoice
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-12-06 03:29 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Those two words dont even belong in the same subject line.
Ps. And as with any post I make regarding the wench the obligatory :puke: must be used.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 07:28 AM
Response to Original message |