Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Droney Scolds Jews for Supporting Lamont

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 11:08 AM
Original message
John Droney Scolds Jews for Supporting Lamont

http://lamontblog.blogspot.com/2006/07/john-droney-scolds-jews-for-supporting.html


David Silverman, writing for JTA, a Jewish news service, has quite the scoop about Jewish support for Ned Lamont. According to an internal poll, Ned is beating Joe Lieberman among Jewish voters in Connecticut:

But an internal Democratic poll of Connecticut Jews sees Lamont leading by 50 percent to 41 percent, JTA has learned. The sample was small, but the results were a dramatic departure from the 90-plus approval rating Lieberman scored among Jews after Al Gore named him as his running mate in 2000.

Connecticut Jews make up 111,000 of the state's 3.4 million people, or a little more than 3 percent of the population, according to the Jewish Virtual Library.

And I didn't think it was possible for Lieberman's right-hand man John Droney - who previously called all Lamont supporters "terrorizing" "left-wing weirdos" - to say something even more offensive. But check this out:

"I find the behavior of a large segment of the Jewish community to be reprehensible and outrageous," said John Droney, a former chairman of the state party who is advising Lieberman to run as an independent. "When he's in trouble like this, they all ought to rally to him. It's too bad that you have to listen to an Irish-American to realize that you've got to support your own home cooking."

"Reprehensible and outrageous." Wow.

It's obvious both Lieberman and Droney yearn for the days of machine politics when a candidate could count on his ethnic constituency for unified and unconditional support regardless of how much he screwed up in his job. Real democracy is a bitch for incumbents like Joe, isn't it. But for a non-Jew to scold Jewish voters like this for daring to support a candidate of their choice... that's what's really reprehensible and outrageous.
---------------------------


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is sick
Because I am a white male should I be bound to support all white male candidates as well? Too bad it is not going to happen. It is sick to demand allegiance based on race, class, gender or religion. Remember the part of the Constitution that says there shall be no religious test?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1monster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Grin. I just had a thought. If all voting age people were required to
vote and Drooney's comment were taken to its logical conclusion, white males would be out of the loop. Latino females would rule all three branches of government. }(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. If it were possible to get a statement from Republican Senators - I'm
sure they would all be pushing for Leiberman. This Droney guy should get all the Republican Senators to petition Jewish voters in CT. That shold seal the deal for Lamont.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ugarte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. Typical Freeper chutzpah...
"We love you Jews so much we know what's best for you."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. There is probably a divide between the different denominations
Orthodox and Conservative for Lieberman, and Reform and Reconstruction for Lamont.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Conservatives are not "conservatives" in American political parlance
Edited on Sun Jul-09-06 01:10 PM by IndianaGreen
Jewish Conservatives are moderates, the Conservative movement being a reaction to what was viewed as excesses by Reform. Our temple Beth-El Zedeck, for example, is a Conservative/Reconstructionist congregation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Most of the Conservative Jews in NJ
that I know are more liberal than they are moderate - epecially in the current shifted to the right political world. We've belonged to a Conervative, a reform and a recontructionist synagogue as we moved around - the services and religious views differ, but I didn't see much difference politically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yes, I'm aware of that, but thank you for pointing that out
I should have made that point clear to people not familiar with Judaism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. Can you imagine if a prominent Catholic leader chastized Catholic voters
for voting for Nixon in 1960?

Playing the religious card is just as bad as playing the race or the patriotism card.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ugarte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. This guy is not even Jewish, making it even more absurd...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. I am a Latina woman.
So I suppose I am supposed to just looove Alberto Gonzales, right? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 03:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. Yes, and with my Italian heritage
I must think Scalia and Alito are the best judges ever on SCOTUS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. Playing the ethnic/religion card is a pathetic sign of desperation. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-09-06 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. This sort of thing really backfired in 1990
when incumbent Senator Rudy Boschwitz sent out a letter to the Jewish Community in Minnesota telling them he was a better Jew than Paul Wellstone. He was publicly criticized by some Rabbis for doing this. The letter went out the weekend before the election and it was what pretty much put Wellstone over the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
15. Sounds all so familiar.
Everyone telling us what is best for us...happens here too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
16. What a pathetic loser!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC