Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conservatives Without Conscience by John Dean.. New Book

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 04:06 PM
Original message
Conservatives Without Conscience by John Dean.. New Book
Mr Dean will appear on Keith Olbermann tonight discussing his new book


Bits of the review via
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0670037745/qid=1152564881/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/104-5426131-2080741?s=books&v=glance&n=283155



“Purporting to show that social conservatives and neoconservatives are, on the whole, demonstrably authoritarian, bigoted, irrational and amoral, Conservatives Without Conscience offers helpful hints such as "Conservatives without conscience do not have horns and tails,"

snip

“Dean draws on five decades of social science research that details the personality traits of what are called "double high authoritarians": self-righteous, mean-spirited, amoral, manipulative, bullying. He concludes that Chuck Colson, Pat Robertson, Newt Gingrich, and Tom DeLay are all textbook examples. Dean calls Vice-President Cheney "the architect of Bush's authoritarian policies," and deems Bush "a mental lightweight with a strong right-wing authoritarian personality." Dean maintains that conservatives without conscience have produced such a hostile, noncollegial environment in Congress that threats of resistance through filibusters have been met with threats of a "nuclear option" and that conservatives have used fearmongering about terrorist attacks to the point where the nation faces a greater threat of relinquishing its ideals of democracy."


Take that Coultergeist. Stick it in your pipe and smoke it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ringo84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't know about this book
It may make us feel better to denigrate conservatives in this way, but I think that we're really just playing their game.

Ann Coulter and company are the ones who usually grouse about people being "immoral". We sink to their level when we do the same thing.

Also, it's wrong to think that all conservatives are like the RWers. Most conservatives are good people that mean well. It's the extremists that have taken over the country.
Ringo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. John Dean is a conservative.
He also knows where a lot of the bodies are buried.

Should we turn into repukes? No.

Should we bend over and ask for more from them?

Hell, no.

But that's just me. You can be the nice one in this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ringo84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. displacedtexan
I understand what you're saying. The fact that he's a conservative actually makes his case stronger than if Molly Ivins or soomeone else from our side said "they're immoral!"
Ringo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. He's a conservative who is trying to get the truth about Bush out..
And as Martha Stewart would say.. "That's a good thing!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. But Dean is saying that the extremists have coopted conservatism.
He's making exactly the same point as you are.

I have read the book, and found it very enlightening. He's saying there's a certain kind of conservative, which he calls the "authoritative conservative," who has become the dominant type of conservative, to the detriment of other forms of conservatism. In other words, conservatism per se is not the evil--just a particular brand of it.

Listen to him on the show tonight. You'll see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ringo84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. BerryBush
I have read the book, and found it very enlightening. He's saying there's a certain kind of conservative, which he calls the "authoritative conservative," who has become the dominant type of conservative, to the detriment of other forms of conservatism. In other words, conservatism per se is not the evil--just a particular brand of it.


Oh. Well, in that case, I take it back. Sounds like he has some common sense.
Ringo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Just like ALL Muslims are not not terrorists!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Dean makes that distinction quite well. He is a Goldwater conservative
which is something that is no longer part of the the new GOP version which is based in authoritarianism NOT the individualism and freedom that the original conservatives cherished.

It's why the GOPs are so dependent on fundamentalist churches and the authoritarian figures there who tell their parishioners how to lead their lives in more ways than spiritually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. John Dean has used his post-Nixon life to study the SOBs thoroughly
Unlike the rest of that gang, who went to jail but never changed their minds or learned anything -- John Dean impresses me as someone who sees the neocons and theocons for what they are: the worst threat to democracy in our lifetimes.

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I really like the guy and occasionally read him
on the findlaw site.

He has an elegant intelligence.

A few months ago he testified before a senate committee.

I forget which asshat pug went at him, but he yelled, why should I believe anything from a felon.

Dean was very calm and responded beautifully
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Sad to say I formed an exceedingly low opinion during Watergate Hearings
It was not until he began to go public during this regime that I revised that opinion. Now I look back at what he said and realize he was caught up in events far beyond his capacity to change, but in his way he tried...

He paid dearly for his membership in the Nixon WH. He's lived a quiet life since then, and obviously has done a tremendous amount of reflection. Who would know better than he what crimes can be committed within those halls?

However, others far older and more powerful than John Dean profited greatly -- even though several went to prison, they eventually profited in money and power by staying loyal to the ideology and companions that landed them in prison in the first place.

I truly appreciate what he is trying to do for this nation now.

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. I thought his book Worse than Watergate was one of the best ones
out there pointing out the problems of the Bush administration. Easy to read, not too long, yet made his points very well. And that came out in 2004. I'm eager to read what he has to say now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-10-06 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
13. The difference between "us" and "them" IMO
Is that for the most part, libs and progressives are not necessarily calling for the end of the Conservatives or the Republican party. At least not most of us....:)

It's the neo-cons who have elevated the "discussion" to survival level. They preach that we on the left must be either converted or destroyed. They really do want to destroy us. Conservatism didn't used to be like that. They discussed things, they made compromises. Hell, congressmen and senators used to go out drinking together after work, regardless of political affiliation or party. The right has successfully killed that bit of comity.

I don't wish either party to have a one-party monopoly, we always will need some kind of counter balance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC