Where do your Senators stand on "Net Neutrality"?

[Eric J in MN]

"Net neutrality" means that companies like AT&T shouldn't be allowed to slow down a website because it offers a competing service such as internet-phone-calls.

Where do your Senators stand on this issue?

Find out here:
http://www.savetheinternet.com/=senatemap

[WCGreen]

1. Immagine that.....

Lieberman waffling....

[bluethruandthru]

2. Thanks for that Eric.

I just sent off an e-mail to my Senator - Barbara Mikulski - who's undecided.

[Eric J in MN]

6. You're welcome. NT

NT

[Avalux]

3. I have no Senators. I am Senatorless.

But hey - at least Cornyn is at the moment undeclared on his stance. Might I hope? Nah. x(

[jobycom]

4. In our case, "undeclared" means "waiting for a higher bid."

[union_maid]

5. One for, one no reply

Clinton sent a very clear and definite affirmation of support for net neutrality in response to an e-mail message. Schumer's office never responded. I don't assume anything from that, though.

[Spirochete]

7. Cantwell for it

Murray undecided.

[Eric J in MN]

9. Please call Patty Murray's office and

...leave a message that she should support "Net Neutrality."

[niccolos_smile]

8. Hutchison against; Cornyn undecided n/t

[Eric J in MN]

10. Please phone John Cornyn's office..

...and tell a staffer that he should support "Net Neutrality" to protect websites from discrimination.

[TayTay]

11. One for Net Neutrality, one undecided

Kerry is for it and promised to fight with Sen. Wyden on it. Sen. Kennedy is officially undecided, but I'll eat several hats with duck sauce if he came out agin it. (C'mon, it's Teddy.)

[Eric J in MN]

12. Wouldn't hurt to call Kennedy's office, though. NT

NT

[calico1]

13. In CT:

Dodd supports net neutrality.
Lieberman is waffling. (This is shocking! :sarcasm: )

[Eric J in MN]

14. But David Brooks wrote Lieberman is...

..."the most kind-hearted and well-intentioned of men."

So who why should we care about Lieberman's actual positions?