Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Army kicks out Halliburton but the big story is ...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-12-06 10:54 AM
Original message
Army kicks out Halliburton but the big story is ...
Edited on Wed Jul-12-06 11:01 AM by welshTerrier2
the article below is mostly about Halliburton losing some of its Army contracts ... but there's one little line in there that really should be the bigger story ...

but first, Halliburton ... we've seen the no bid contracts going to Halliburton and we raised hell about it on the web ... still, there's been almost no reaction in Washington for far too long ... and, of course, all this impropriety should be directly linked to cheney ... it isn't though; at least not in a way the American people can see ...

but things may finally be changing ... is it just possible that all the audits and even a little Congressional oversight may at last be returning at least a little bit of fiscal sanity? it boggles the mind that instead of rebuilding Iraq's infrastructure, a policy that MIGHT have helped lead to peace in Iraq, once again the great corporate welfare program walked off with our tax dollars ...

and the hidden line in the story below:

"The Pentagon's decision on Halliburton comes as the U.S. contribution to Iraq's reconstruction begins to wane, reducing opportunities for U.S. companies after nearly four years of massive payouts to the private sector, the newspaper said."

Begins to wane? THINK ABOUT THAT!!! begins to wane because Iraq is just about back to normal? begins to wane because Iraqis no longer have to drink water contaminated with sewerage? begins to wane because in 130 degree heat, they only get a couple of hours a day of electricity? begins to wane because only 60% of Iraqis are unemployed because there's no place to work? begins to wane because the US has fulfilled its responsibilities for totally destroying the civilian infrastructure in Iraq????????

if there were justice in this world, bush, cheney and rumsfeld would be hanged from the tallest building in Baghdad!


source: http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=politicsNews&storyID=2006-07-12T122956Z_01_N11215875_RTRUKOC_0_US-ARMS-HALLIBURTON-IRAQ.xml

The U.S. Army will discontinue its multi-billion dollar contract with oil services giant Halliburton Co. to provide logistical support to U.S. troops worldwide, The Washington Post reported on Wednesday.

Halliburton, formerly run by Vice President Dick Cheney, has drawn scrutiny for its work in Iraq from auditors, congressional Democrats and the Justice Department, which is investigating potential overcharges for fuel, dining and laundry services. <skip>

Army officials defended the company's performance but said Pentagon leaders decided multiple contractors would give them better prices, more accountability and greater protection if a one contractor fails to perform, the newspaper said. <skip>

The Pentagon's decision on Halliburton comes as the U.S. contribution to Iraq's reconstruction begins to wane, reducing opportunities for U.S. companies after nearly four years of massive payouts to the private sector, the newspaper said. <skip>


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-12-06 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting catch
Looks like the first to "cut and run" from Iraq may be American corporations interested in saving their own skins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-12-06 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. This could be a signal of impending military pull-out.
If our troops leave, there's no way Halliburton can safely operate there; our troops provide security to the contractors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-12-06 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. yes and no ...
i think you're right that this signals a significant change ... it probably means a major drop in funding for logistical support of the troops which implies that many troops will be withdrawn ...

but i think it also signals the beginning of the next phase in "feeding the empire" ... the next phase will be the completion of permanent bases to being development of new Iraqi oil fields by Big Oil ... this will require a smaller, more stationary military force ...

there's no way in hell bush is going to pull all the troops out ... he went there for oil and the agreements (PSA's) have all been signed by the "autonomous" Iraqi government ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itzamirakul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-12-06 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Agree...but I also think that with elections in 06 and 08 coming...
the GOP does not want to have to explain Halliburton's overcharging and total monopoly on supplying the occupation. So after 6 years of stealing the American treasury blind, they will now pull out. This removes one of the charges that the Dems could level at the Repubs, esp in 08 (and that also depends on who our candidate is and if that candidate has the guts to even mention Halliburton.

According to aol news, they will be replaced by three private companies who will be chosen from among those who bid to supply the troops, etc. I won't be surprised to find that Halliburton will divide up one of its arms into several more smaller suposedly independent companies (they already have some)and win the bidding war.

Who the hell do they think they are fooling?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yoda Yada Donating Member (474 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-12-06 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. BINGO!
Halliburton was the "one and only" for six years, and now,....4 MONTHS BEFORE THE ELECTION.....they decide to change their war-profiteering policy"? :crazy:

AFTER the election, Halliburton WILL BE BACK....stronger, and more despicable than ever!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-12-06 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. They've soaked us for about all they can...
now they'll leave this mess for the Dems to clean up (just as Bush has promised numerous times.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-12-06 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. They're not even pretending to reconstruct anymore.
Which begs the question, where is all that money going?

I doubt we'll ever see it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-12-06 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
6. So now that we broke it, we are not going to fix it
Excellent catch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fabio Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-12-06 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
7. Good riddance to Halliburton, BUT
I have hope that the rebuilding effort is being contracted to more local and regional companies from the MidEast. I think that is a driver in diminishing business ops. I also agree that this may be the precursor to a policy shift of withdrawal (not that the WH would ever cast it that way)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-12-06 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
9. This story means only one thing:
There is no more money to be made there, so they are leaving to protect their profits and the profits of their Bush/Cheney investors. Trust me, they are NOT being kicked out.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-12-06 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. DING DING DING! Totally Committed, you're our grand prize winner!
There is no more money to be made there, so they are leaving to protect their profits and the profits of their Bush/Cheney investors.
If the Dems take over, I hope there's some nice anti-profiteering laws they can come up with.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-12-06 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. Does GE stand a chance of getting any contracts out of this?
The WH could be attempting to bribe NBC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC