Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My top 10 Senate races

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
safi0 Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 11:19 AM
Original message
My top 10 Senate races
Edited on Sun Jul-16-06 11:25 AM by safi0
I like to do these every couple months just to update the progress of the various races. As we get close and closer to election day I may do them more often.

Best of the rest:

Nebraska-Ben Nelson isn't my type of Senator, but his constituents seem to love him and the only reason this race is even on the radar is because its Nebraska.
Prediction: Nelson wins 57-42

Washington-Numerically I think this race may be close, but I have yet to see how McGavick can overcome Washington's left-ward tilt.
Prediction: Cantwell wins 53-46

Arizona-Jim Pederson did a substantial ad buy a while back and it resulted in a bump in the polls. Since then, this race has been pretty quite. The only way Pederson can win is if he continues to do ads.
Prediction: Kyl wins 54-45

Connecticut-Not exactly sure where to place a race like this, since the Republican has next to no chance of winning. I think Lamont wins the primary, what will be interesting then is to see how many Republicans and Indies go over to Lieberman.
Prediction: Lamont wins the primry by about 5-8 points. He goes on to win the general with about 36-40% as Republicans believe that their candidate can actually win with the Democratic vote being split.

My top 10

10. New Jersey-As you can see by my ranking I'm not nearly as concerned about this race as others. Kean really is nothing more than a last name and Menendez has begun to expose him as, as much. This isn't Okahoma its New Jersey, Kean will not win a Senate race just because of his last name and that's all he has going for him right now.
Prediction:Menendez wins 54-45

9. Virginia-This is a race that has a lot of potential to move up. Allen is scared of Webb because is everything Allen isn't an everything Allen wants to be. Everyone knows that the debates between these two are going to be great, but Webb has to prove himself as a candidate in terms of retail politics, fundraising, handshaking, things like that. Allen's biggest advantage right now is that he has like a 20:1 cash advantage.
Prediction: Allen wins 52-47

8.Maryland-Unfortunately Michael Steele put up huge fundraising numbers in the last quarter. Other than CT, this is the only other compeitive primary we still have. I think that Kwesi Mfume can win this race, I think Ben Cardin would. That's the question a lot of MD Dems are going to have to ask themselves, do you back the candidate who is maybe not your ideal candidate but would probably win rather easily, or the candidate who is ideologically close to you but would be in a dog fight. If Mfume wins the race, he's going to need a lot of help from the DSCC. Mfume has around 300-500K COH and Steele has 4.45 mill.
Prediction:Cardin wins the primary and the general

7.Tennessee-If their was ever a perfect time to win this race its now. We have a candidate who, while probably not DU's favorite candidate, is young, very smart, and very charismatic. On the other hand the Republicans are having a bitter, divisive primary full of 2nd tier candidates. Van Hilleary is the guy I'm hoping doesn't win the GOP primary. He comes from a swing district and is someone the base would turn out for. Ed Bryant comes from a strongly conservative area and can easily be portrayed as a nut. Bob Corker is a guy who I'm not sure the GOP base would turn out for. Maybe someone from TN can give me some insight about who's leading, because I have no idea.
Prediction: Hilleary wins 52-47, and if he doesn't win the primary Ford would beat the other two.

6.Ohio-As evidenced by Dewine's new ad, this race is going to get real ugly. This is probably the pre-eminent swing state. Bush has terrible approval ratings, and Dewine's are rather mediocre. The problem seems to be that Sherrod Brown has yet to really be able to tap into the anger people have towards Bush and the OH GOP. I'm constantly going back and forth on this race, I'm in the optimist period right now though.
Prediction: Brown wins 50-49

5.Minnesota-Minnesotans you have my deepest sympathy because you are going be bombared with ads soon. Both candidates are raising money at an impressive clip, and Klobuchar has just started her first ad buy. One of the only states, where Kerry bested Gore and I don't know who are the Kennedy Democrats. That was a weird term, the Mark Kennedy Demcorats. Point being, that until he finds some of those I don't see how he wins.
Prediction: Klobuchar wins 52-47

4.Missouri-This race has been the definition of a toss-up. McCaskill is running a very smart campaign, going after the people who had soft support for Blunt over her in her 04 Gov race. Maybe its just me, but I'm waiting for one of the candidates to say or do something that will give either candidate any real kind of advantage. That opportunity may present itself to McCaskill as the Senate starts to debate the stem cell bill. If Talent votes against it and Bush uses his first veto on it this may be the opening McCaskill needs. MO has a stem cell initiative on the ballot and McCaskill has been a very strong supporter of it while I believe Talent is on his 7th position on the issue.
Prediction: McCaskill wins 51-49

3.Rhode Island-First things first, if Laffey wins the primary this race immediately goes to number one on this list, as I think the closest I've seen a Laffey-Whitehouse race was 53-27. So the rest of my analysis will be on a Chaffee-Whotehosue race. Whitehouse and Chaffee were pretty much even in finances after the first quarter and since then Whitehouse's primary opponent dropped out and he had fundraisers with Jack Reed and Bill Clinton. Take into account the fact that Chaffee has a primary and Whitehouse doesn't and Whitehouse will almost certainly head into the general election with a money advantage. Also, Ramussen shows that Whitehouse leads Chaffee in their newest poll 46-41. Its still on the premium section of Rasmussen's site, but Whitehouse has it on the front page of his site.
Prediction: Whitehouse beats Chaffee 52-48

2.Montana-I think Conrad Burns is fucked. I think everyone thinks( as well they should) that he's just another corrupt member of Congress. Their obvious going to try to portray Tester as a guy who will burn all your flags take away your bibles and marry all the gay people. His early rhetoric shows that he's not going to put up with that. The only thing Burns has going for him is that he has a lto of money and MT is just one media market making it relatively cheap. I think that the opinions of Burns are pretty much set in stone for Montanans.
Prediction: Tester wins 53-47

1.Pennsylvania-Casey entered the race around January/February of 05, a year and a half ago. That entire time Casey has lead in the polls and everyone keeps saying this race will tighten up. Despite that, virutally the entire time the polls have remained consistent. They show Casey in the low to mid 50's and Santorum in the high 30's to low 40's. The only thing Santorum has is the same thing Burns has which is money. Casey has a solid amount of money, but Santorum still has a strong COH advantage. Dfference between him and Burns is that PA is an extremely expensive media market. I hope PA residents don't view it this way, but as a resident of Wisconsin I can say that Santorum is finished.
Prediction: Casey wins 56-44

Unless Ed Bryant or Bon Corker win the TN primary I don't have the Dems taking back the Senate. Under my predictions, it would be 50R 49D and Bernie, essentially an evenly split Senate with Dick giving the GOp the advantage.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think Ohio will be a much larger victory for Brown than you predict
It was extremely good news that Hackett joined the Brown team. Nothing is dividing the Democrats in that state now, and the more garbage people hear about Dewine the more evident it is the corrpution that surrounds him


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safi0 Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I hope so
and I'll admit my own biases that Hackett was probably my favorite candidate from this cycle, so I've been more critical of Brown than perhaps he deserves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I was a Hackett supporter also, but I think the dynamics have changed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. I disagree about WA
In 2000 Cantwell narrowly defeated Gorton, who was surprisingly conservative from what I can tell, especially considering he was from WA. WA was able to elect a rightwinger like Gorton for a few terms, and I think many Democrats have forgotten that. I won't be surprised if there are enough Democrats who want to Naderize or not vote for Cantwell and cost her the election. You know, the whole "I am not comfortable voting for that DINO, but I am comfortable subjecting WA to an even more pro-war and conservative Republican, and subjecting America to a greater Republican majority" argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safi0 Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Gorton was
Regarded as a true moderate. I'm pretty sure he was quite socially liberal. The thing is, I don't think their are any viable third party candidates, plus Cantwell's vote for the Reed-Levin ammendment probably helped her in this area.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Gorton is on the board of the Discovery Institute...
The whacko group pushing Intelligent Design for the schools...not really a social liberal!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. To be honest I'd sign for your outcome right now.............
A 50-50 split, with a chance to gain a majority in 2008 would be great at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Also, any Bush nominees would have difficulty....
getting confirmed. The Dems will have much more leverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Sign up? I'd do multiple cartwheels
He's got us winning every squeaker race in the vital states -- Ohio, Missouri and Rhode Island. We're an underdog in all three of those races right now. I'm concerned DUers don't realize that. True, it's close in all three states but the Republican incumbent is favored.

I like the state by state analysis and most of the numbers, but Cantwell is very unlikely to win by 7 points, nor Menendez by 9. But I do think we'll hold on to those.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. K&R - Because we all need to know more about what is happening
across the country...

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
7. I believe that Webb can oust Allen in Virginia.
Also, Brown will win by more than 1 point in Ohio. Klobuchar will win by about 6-8 points in Minn. Also, Pederson can oust Kyl too. It will be close, but it is most certainly doable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safi0 Donating Member (993 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. This is simply my
View based on what's happened so far. Of course things will change. I have been less than impressed by Sherrod's campaign so far, but I think the fact that everyone in the Ohio GOP appears to be under some cloud of corruption is my chief reason for picking Sherrod. The MN race is all about turnout because I don't think either candidate has a lot of crossover appeal. Finally with VA I do think Webb could pull it off, but he has a huge money disadvantage and he has yet so show he can do the little things that make a successful candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. Here's some more information
I've started compiling information on the competitive races and posting it on DU.

As November approaches, I'm going to be adding more information to this list so that DUers can have a good idea of what's going on. My next update will have the 3Q fundraising info.

Here it is: Competitive Congressional Race List
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-16-06 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
12. I know that it's dirty and all but the Webb campaign in Va...
...needs to pay closer attention to things like this:
http://gotv.blogspot.com/2005/06/is-george-allen-racist.html



I am hoping to try to find one of the people Allen went to High School with in Palos Verdes, CA who will come out and be honest about the type of guy he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheVirginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
15. Tennessee...
Bob Corker currently leads the GOP field by about fifteen points, thanks to the amount of ads he's taken out, which is thanks to the amount of money he has on hand. Corker is also more moderate than Bryant or Hilleary, which will help him out in a general election. If Corker wins the GOP primary, which he's aiming to, then he'll most likely win a disappointingly uncompetitive race. I think Bryant or Hilleary as the GOP nominee would be a crapshoot with Ford.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Thanks
i wasn't going to look at that race until after the primary. If that's not a competitive race our chances at +6 are close to nil. I hope DUers don't scream fix if we end up with a solid +2 to +4.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheVirginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Please.
DUers will scream "fix" no matter how the Democrats do. If there's a loss in Missouri, Ohio, Montana, Pennsylvania, Washington, New Jersey, Virginia, Tennessee, Arizona, or Rhode Island for a Democratic candidate, there will be a chorus of people here insisting that the election is rigged.

The mentality of it is quite interesting, if you think about it. Throughout the history of democracy, people take a loss at an election as a sign to adjust thier platform to appeal to more voters. By using "the election was fixed" as a cover, people can go on believing that they're right now matter what, even if the public rejects it, because they believe they'd rightly win the election were it not for "the machines". The fact that "Diebold" in itself has become a one-word response to any election thread proves that people not only bemoan electoral fraud, but in fact look forward to it. Its almost a validation of their beliefs, albeit completely artificial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. You've picked up things in a hurry
It took me a full election cycle. And I don't know how many times I've posted a variant of your second paragraph.

After 2004 I was matter-of-factly posting Kerry lost nationally 51-48, just as a reference and not thinking anything about it. Then several posters started insisting I stop mentioning those numbers, "that's the mistake you're making," a direct quote from TIA. It's like the Seahawks trying to claim the final score of the Super Bowl doesn't exist in all the record books, based on bad officiating.

I doubt you were here before Kaine/Kilgore last fall. There were Diebold defeatists in those threads also. When we won, it was waved off as (summarizing):

* not significant enough to fix
* obviously they'll give us one this year to set up ten thefts next year
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Son Of Spy Donating Member (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
16. OHIO
I'm really worried about getting ANY fair election results out of OHIO...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sam Odom Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-17-06 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
17. Only if Ford could win Tenn
He would be a 'lock' for VP in '08
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC