Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I can't believe how many here have baught into the moronic "Kerry/Edwards"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 05:17 AM
Original message
I can't believe how many here have baught into the moronic "Kerry/Edwards"
that idea of a ticket has no grounding in our political necessity. Would Edwards make a good vp? Yeah, probably, but NOT for John Kerry. Kerry CAN NOT be competative in Florida in any probability if he doesn't have Graham as his runningmate. Edwards is the only candidate who could ever carry NC in all probablity, but only at the top of the ticket and even that would be difficult.

Most of the media whores who haven't shut up about this idea since AFTER Edwards announced he was running for PRESIDENT, either don't have a clue about the details of our current national political balances and trends or don't want Edwards to be nominated as the one on the top of the ticket so they reduce him by floating the vp angle. They did and have done that to both Graham and Clark as well.

It is just dumb in my opinion to nominate an eastern establishment New Englander over one of 2 humbly-born southernors because it pretty much automatically slashes of a huge number of electoral votes and gives you no margin of error, but to then pass over the potential runningmate who could make the single most important swingstate and only possible southern state competative for you, because another candidate "would make a nice vp" is ludicrous.

If Kerry does get nominated, Edwards can be just as good a president-in-waiting as an Attorney General, at least for one term, than as a VP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 05:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. What is the basis for your assertion
"Kerry CAN NOT be competative in Florida" ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's just dumb to nominate someone based
Edited on Thu Feb-05-04 05:54 AM by bowens43
on geography. You insult southerners when you suggest that they won't vote for anyone not from the south. Graham never had a chance and Clark has nothing to offer.


Edwards will make a fine VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 06:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I never, ever suggested southernors won't vote for non=southernors
but 2 rural/poor-born, southernors are in contention, and 2(or 1 now) upper-class, eastern-establishment New Englanders from the 2(or 1) worst states a democratic nominee could possibly come from electability-wise are in contention.

The best state a democratic nominee could come from would be Florida. And the best region they could come from is either the south or southwest, or after that, one of the big midwestern states like Ohio.

But we don't have any serious candidates running from those places. Just like the best states a republican could run from strategically would be Pennsylvania, or Michigan.

It's not insulting one bit to point out political trends that even the most casual observer of politics can observe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Gep or Graham make a lot of political balance sense - but Edwards
is a great campaign speaker - and might be more useful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. I tire of the "Dems cannot win in south"...
mantra. Whomever the Dem nominee is, when he mentions jobs going abroad he will bypass and short circuit any gods guns and gays issue. You can take that to the bank friends!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Some democrats can and some democrats PROBABLY can't
Edited on Thu Feb-05-04 06:26 AM by Bombtrack
I tire of people putting words into my mouth. I go to school at one of the most renowned colleges of the south in the social sciences and I am required to study what does and doesn't win elections where and when.

Clark would probably make Arkansas, Louisiana, and Florida into into swingstates(and NC, Georgia and Virginia into longshots). Edwards could make Florida and Louisiana into swingstates, with Georgia as a longshot.

A Kerry/Edwards couldn't win Florida, in almost all probability. And we need the best probability we can get.

I was an Edwards-supporter and volunteer before Clark joined the race and I have nothing against him. But he isn't a good VP FOR KERRY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colonel odis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. i think the continuing talk about edwards as kerry's vp
is patronizing and paternal. if it's kerry's folks floating that idea, screw them.

kerry would make a fine president. edwards would make a fine president. (finer, in my humble opinion.) but i feel like there's a condescending attitude toward edwards. like maybe he'll do ok when he grows up.

phft! edwards is all grown up. he's got a message that negates bush's tactic of scaring the working class. what he says is positive, optimistic, and what you win elections with.

it's not like he NEEDS john kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. We don't need Florida, we need Ohio, West Virginia....
Louisiana, and Arkansas. In fact, I don't think we should even mount a campaign in Florida... instead choosing to tell the media "Why bother? Jeb Bush is governor, obviously he'll just fix the election again."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-04 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
9. Locking.....
1. If you start a thread in this forum, you must present your opinion in a manner that is not inflammatory, which respects differences in opinion, and which is likely to lead to respectful discussion rather than flaming. The moderators have the sole authority to decide whether a thread topic is inflammatory.



DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC