Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Marriage is not about love. It's about a love that can bear children."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 07:13 AM
Original message
"Marriage is not about love. It's about a love that can bear children."
--TODD AKIN, Republican Congressman from Missouri, calling for the House to pass a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. The measure failed

Time


http://www.house.gov/akin/

"I hope you've heard the great news, America. We are winning. Yesterday, the New York Times made an announcement. They're reducing the width of their newspaper by an inch and a half. That's an inch and a half less of state secrets revealed every day." --STEPHEN COLBERT

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Guess my husband and I better get divorced, then.
Apparently our love is worthless.


:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I guess we'll have to do the same
:shrug: :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
56. Yep, guess my one true love and I don't deserve to be married...
...since we can't procreate.

Cripes, do they GET any dumber than this obscene waste of carbon?

irritatedly,
Bright
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mad_Dem_X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
58. I guess my marriage is worthless, too
Married almost nine years to a wonderful man; neither of us wanted children. I guess we shouldn't be married then.

I have this massive urge to put my foot up that guy's @ss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
73. Another worthless marriage here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Gee--
and all this time I thought my marriage was about being as close as possible to the object of my affections. Silly me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. .
My wife and I cannot conceive children. Is our marriage invalid?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. And Emma Goldman, the anarchist, deemed marriage to be "legal
prostitution". Maybe on that logic, marriage itself should be banned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. Vasectomies must be outlawed, then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. Well, he got the first half right, anyway:
Marriage ISN'T about love. Anyone who thinks it is has been brainwashed by too many romance novels and DeBeers commercials. The only reason marriage even EXISTS is because it was implemented as a means of attempting, in a patriarchal society, to ensure the paternity of offspring, and to transmit property rights through a 'legitimate' male line. Nothing at all to do with love.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickinSTL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. right....
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. If you have an opinion to the contrary...
feel free to share it. (But unless you happen to have some knowledge of historical sociology and a firm basis for grounding your arguments, don't expect me to buy it.)

Or are of you of the opinion that the half-arsed fuckwittery of an eye-rolling smiley constitutes a valid counterargument?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickinSTL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. sigh.
I just don't buy that marriage is simply a paternalistic means of control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #15
24. Really? Look at the history of women's rights in marriage. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickinSTL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. the fact that women's rights have been trampled on
doesn't mean that marriage is the cause.

A good marriage isn't about power. The abuse of a system doesn't mean the system itself is the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. I'm saying that women used to have no rights in a marriage.
Previously, when a women got married she became property and her property became her husband's property. And when he died - she was out on the streets because one of his brothers took over the homestead.

We both agree this shouldn't be about power - but you've got to look at the history of marriage to see why the idiot congressman is so wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #27
35. Yes and no. It depends upon the era of history and geographic location.
Previously, when a women got married she became property and her property became her husband's property. And when he died - she was out on the streets because one of his brothers took over the homestead.

This comment is absolutely correct...for specific times and places. Not all of history. The Graff book, in my opinion, should be required reading for anyone who is interested in discussing marriage as a social institution. Stephanie Coontz is also a great read about the development of marriage and family in a socio-historic context.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #35
53. Thanks for the follow up - I may need to find a few books for
summer reading.

R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smtpgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #25
63. Yep, because you have those fake hair wearin'
asshats, that "Buy" their love when they go out of town.

Maybe arrest all of the johns too, and the "customers"


WE NEED A WOMAN PRESIDENT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #15
44. It is the center of a stable economic unit...
...for a time when people were governed by social conventions rather than a legal system. When life is hard, brutal and short, the family structure was essential for any sort of security. That was the real purpose of marriage. It also ensured governance by the eldest male of the clan and helped insure clearly defined blood lines. The entire fuedal society was based on this with church and secular rulers assuming roles analogous to the head male of a family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. Actually, the church didn't know what to do with marriage for quite awhile
It became a sacrament in the RC church rather late and quite grudgingly. (It was never a sacrament in the protestant churches.) As a consequence, the waters are rather muddy with respect to who was wed to whom in the first twelve centuries CE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Finder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. I agree with you and...
I believe that is the root of the high divorce rate in the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #7
23. Exactly what Spider Jerusalem said! (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
34. "What Is Marriage For?" by E.J. Graff
Edited on Mon Jul-24-06 10:35 AM by Pacifist Patriot
Best book I've read on the subject in a long time. Contemporary marriage does have something to do with love. It's marriage as it evolved throughout history that typically did not.

Just because the institution began as an economic transaction does not mean it carries that weight in the partnership my husband and I share and celebrate today. I'm all for letting the institution of marriage grow, evolve and become something healthy and beneficial to anyone and everyone who electively chooses it as part of their lives.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemExpat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 07:24 AM
Original message
My partner and I are past child-bearing years....
invalid love?..... invalid marriage?

DemEx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
8. I'll have to tell my husband that our marriage is a sham
and loveless.... he won't like this....we both thought we had a real marriage..a real partnership. Silly us.

but he'll be happy to know that leaves a marriage based on desire...he likes feeling sexy and attractive. And I love my husband and I like making him feel good....just don't tell that idiot Akin I love my husband....he wouldn't understand love and it might scare him. I do so hate challenging the way people think...I take such great comfort in people who wrap themselves up in their own little security blankies. I keep hoping they'll suffocate. (Oh! - did I say that out loud?)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TlalocW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
11. I'm childfree and have a vasectomy
I will know what proper love is, I guess.

It's not surprising that this comes out of Missouri. I went to college at Pittsburg State, a small college in the southeast corner of Kansas, just over the border from Missouri and would read newspapers that covered both states. I remember reading a news article about how the Missouri legislature had passed some sort of bill that involved sex in some way, but it was so poorly written with overly-flowery language that some linguists looked at it and claimed that they had passed a bill that completely outlawed sex. Some of my college profs had a good laugh at that.

TlalocW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
12. His statement is also a profound insult
to all the couples who want children, but for whatever reason can't bear them.

What a schmuck. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lisamay Donating Member (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
70. thank you
my husband and I can't seem to have children. And it's not from lack of trying(or wanting, or $$ spent trying to remedy it) I guess I'll tell him that we have to divorce because we don't count and that our marriage is not valid...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
13. So, he is proposing fertility tests before giving marriage licenses? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #13
36. Paintings of Royal Weddings from 1600's often included very pregnant
brides -- they had to demonstrate their ability to breed before they would be married into the Royal family. I remember just being amazed at that in college when I took Art History.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
16. Pat Buchanan and his wife never had children. Bob and Elizabeth Dole never
had children. I think they committed fraud on their churches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #16
26. Excellent point
What a rube this guy is :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smtpgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #26
64. SECOND that Excellent point
There are alot of rubes out there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
17. What's the exact satistic -- 45 or 50% or so? -- of marriages bust up
in the U.S.

I doubt seriously if all of them were undertaken in love, although some surely are. I mainly doubt that any of them dissolved because two lesbians moved in down the street or two gay men live in apartment 5E upstairs.

This Congressman is unfamiliar to me, and I am eternally grateful for that.

What an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #17
29. s-t-a-t-i-s-t-i-c
s-t-a-i-s-t-i-c

s-a-t-t-i-c-i-s

s-a-d-i-s-t-i-c

s-a-t-e-t-i-c

s-a-d-e-s-t-i-c

r-a-y s-a-d-e-c-k-i
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
18. Oh Boy...if a Woman I was dating ever said that to me, ....
...that would be our last Date.
...and Yes...I do believe in Magic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #18
30. Same here
Run Forrest, RUN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #18
32. I a man I was dating ever said that to me....
that would be our last date. Ew!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnieBW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
19. My Friend's Husband of 11 Years Just Left Her
A couple that my husband and I have known for a long time, and have been married for 11 years, just separated. She's got health problems, and he went looking for love on the Internet. He'd been cyber-sexing this woman in another state for a while, then they started hooking up in person. He's one of these morals-spouting asshats, too. But, of course, his morals can't get in the way of his screwing around outside of marriage, and leaving his wife who could probably go on disability. (Shades of Newt Gingrich, anyone?) BTW, the woman he's seeing is 10 years older than his current wife, and has two kids from her first marriage, which suspiciously ended about the time they started fooling around.

The reason that I'm bringing this up is that it had NOTHING to do with wanting kids (he's got a daughter from his first marriage) or homosexuality. Unless, of course, you count all of his friends in the community theater group. That's it! Exposure to thespians caused him to cheat on his wife! It's all a big thespian conspiracy! :D

People are gonna cheat on their spouses, no matter what you do. That's the biggest threat to marriage, not anything that these wingnuts spout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
20. I guess sterile couples are not allowed to be married?
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaLynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
21. Wow -- guess I can't get married then.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KKKarl is an idiot Donating Member (662 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
22. That is stupid
The congressman has lost his head. It is like people from years gone by saying that sex is only to be had to bear children. Also if marriage is "about a love that can bear children" then what about those children that are conceived out of marriage. Many of those children have no love between their mother & father. The pregnancy just happened.

Please can we have an IQ test for people before they run for government. The results should be published & then people can decide who they want to vote for.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #22
49. Years gone by?
It is like people from years gone by saying that sex is only to be had to bear children.

The only thing I would quibble with here is the "Years gone by." Anti-contraceptive nuts--who are becoming increasingly vocal and powerful, despite their obvious lunacy and their minority status--are here today, and this is exactly what they believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
28. "An avid student of the U.S. Constitution..."
:rofl:

It actually says that at his house.gov biography!

PROVE IT, ASSHOLE!!!

"Todd and Lulli have six children"

Holy shit!

http://www.house.gov/akin/congressman.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #28
38. Of course he's an avid student. It's taken him how many years...
to stumble through the preamble?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
31. More verbal diarrhea. We're drowning in it.
Verbal diarrhea: n. shit that spews spastically from the oral cavity without first being processed by a brain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
33. That photo's of Akin? I don't see a wedding ring on that guy's finger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. Married 31 years with 6 kids.
Single ring ceremony?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #37
40. Yeah. Could be.
Maybe he should spend more time keeping his own homefires burning and less time trying to deny happiness to others.

What a smarmy little puke he must be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #37
42. Reminds me of the Benny Hill sketch
Dad (Benny) climbs into bed, sneeringly deriding his wife "Goodnight, mother of six." She returns with "Goodnight. Father of one." The scene closes on Benny's startled face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
39. So, women who can't conceive
and men who are impotent shouldn't be allowed to marry, either? What about men with vasetcomies? What about women with their tubes tied? They shouldn't be married either, I guess. Is that what this whackadoo is saying?

TC

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
41. truth is, it's not about love at all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
43. So infertile couples do not love each other? People who adopt children
but have no "biological" (in quotes because every child gets born somehow)children do not have loving marriages? What kind of bullcrap is that? Do these people even listen to themselves?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #43
45. Where DOES this leave the "snow flake babies"?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #45
51. Well their adoptive parents better have a biological child or they won't
be loved. Of course if the adoptive parents agree to have a biological child the lovin can begin then. Who knew that it was so easy to have a loving marriage? Just have kids!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
47. No point in remarrying later in life, then.
Edited on Mon Jul-24-06 12:13 PM by eppur_se_muova
Widow? Widower? Tough. Deal with it. "Compassionless Conservatism (TM)" indeed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
48. Ha! Nice try
There is no "Todd Akin", is there? This is really one of those Onion articles, right?

You think I was born yesterday?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. No, he's real
real stupid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #52
59. As is often the case
Truth is stupider than parody these days where Bushbots are concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #59
61. Feel sorry for me, he's from my district. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #61
65. You're almost ashamed to admit it, aren't you?
I know how you feel. Where I used to live there was a fundie nutcase/anti-abortion/finger-waggin' holier-than-thou MP (our equivalent of Senator).

Then I heard he ran off with his secretary for a dirty weekend and divorced his wife.

They're really like cartoon characters, aren't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #65
66. He's a racist asshole, a festering, infected hemorrhoid ridden asshole.
You should read his screeds on "Urban Life", while he doesn't outright say it, his screeds are just dripping with racism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
50. By their logic, newly married couples and couples w/o children
Edited on Mon Jul-24-06 12:35 PM by sakabatou
should divorce and never marry again. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
54. And what after menopause?
Should we just be abandoned or forced into slavery, since we no longer serve society?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
55. He looks just as half-witted as he is.
Why is it these repukes are always so ugly? And they always look either drunk or deranged.

Guess I answered my own question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #55
57. ugly inside makes you ugly outside
Babs Sr is a prime example
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
60. What a thoroughly ignorant remark
I hope he hears from consituents dealing with the pain of infertility. Or gay couples who have children. Or adoptive parents.

This is SO not about reproduction, and all about human rights!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StellaBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
62. Is he Catholic?
Or just aping their dogma?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-24-06 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
67. Women that can no longer ovulate, cannot get married!
Looking at Akin's picture, is this a man that one would fuck? I don't think so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
68. So,
They'll be demanding fertility tests prior to giving out marriage licenses? Denying marriage licenses to couples where either/both partners don't want to have children or either/both are past childbearing age? :shrug:


Pure horsepucky, the notion of denying gays the right to marry based on marriage being about "having children".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
69. thugs don't care about love. thugs only care about making more thug babies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
71. My child-bearing days are over. I guess when my youngest
graduates high school we better get divorced. Somebody ought to remind this a$$hole that the highest divorce rate is in the Bible belt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemsRBetterLovers Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
72. BEAR CHILDREN!
THEY ARE THE NUMBER ONE THREAT! RUN FOR YOUR LIVES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
74. This is a bit personal but...
My wife had cancer and since the resulting surgery, it is impossible for us to conceive children. But since that time we chose to foster and adopt children.

Shall I be offended by the politicians statement? I guess at first I was, because he totally invalidated my 10 year marriage, our personal struggles, and our wonderful children. But then I remembered, this guy just lumped us in with the gays and other people he may deem as rabble and undesirables. Well, I am cool with that. Gays and lesbians are awesome.

Three cheers for Senator what's-his-face who just gave ammunition, solidarity, and resolve to all of us. Woohoo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pushed To The Left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-29-06 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
75. One of the dumbest right wing statements yet
They are trying so hard and reaching do far to find a "logical" reason to justify their bigotry. Like the Flag Amendment, the Marriage Amendment is based purely on emotion rather than logic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
76. When my great grandfatyher remarried in his 70's I am pretty sure
he and his wife (also in her 70s) had no intention of making babies together. They did however stay married for 20 years or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC