Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So what is an acceptable form of voting machine

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 12:19 PM
Original message
So what is an acceptable form of voting machine
I'm starting to think that any voting machine that relies on solely computer technology is suspect at best. I'm almost thinking that punch ballots might be the most acceptable form out there because at least we still have the punch ballots, we would just need to educate the voter to make sure all punches are thoroughly pushed through before depositing punch cards.

What do you folks think
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GrpCaptMandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Pencil and paper
Most so-called "civilzed" nations manage to have fair elections with nothing more than that and dedicated public servants.

It's not about voting. It's about profit. That's where the machines come from.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Damn, you stole my thunder.
Pencil and Paper *is* the high tech way to vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabbat hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. optical scan
fill in the dot. make the dots far enough apart so they cant be doubled up.

educate peopel that if they make a mistake to ask for a fresh ballot. the old one is then shredded immediately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. optical scan, but ballot printers can prevent under/over votes
It also provides multiple language support and multimedia for the visually impaired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stellanoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Optical scanners stink
because although they generate paper, the tabulators are highly hackable and the ballots are never reviewed if the margin of victory is over 5 %. Rig it so the Repuke wins by over 5% and presto, discredit the exit polls and the actual votes don't matter at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabbat hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. yes
but with optical scan you can do a hand recount.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. The two major flaws we have learned about Optical Scan
#1 - If the holes are not punched all the way through then the ballot could be spoiled. The solution would be signs reminding people to check their punchcards thoroughly before depositing your ballot.

#2 - Ballots can be made confusing - Here we need to make sure that we have a uniform ballot in large enough print for anyone to read.


In rural Perry County, PA we had a punchcard ballot that was like 'Reading a Book" each page would go to the next line on the punchcards for ballot and names were only on one side with instruction reminders on the otherside.

Best voting system ever!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. You're describing punch cards, not optical scan
There are no punches on optical scan. It's like a standardized test, filling in bubbles or completing an arrow.

There can still be errors if you don't fill in the bubble completely or make additional marks on the ballot, etc., which is why it's imperative to have error correcting optical scanners. They will spit the ballot back at you with warning you over voted or under voted. Some lesser optical scan machines do not provide error correction, and in that case the residual rate is not much different than punch cards. With error correction, it's generally half or less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Right, optical scan with error correction
Meaning over votes are not allowed and you're also prompted in the case of an under vote, to make sure it's intentional.

Thank god the hideous punch cards are all but phased out. The percentage I saw for 2006 is 41% of voters will use optical scan, 39% on electronic machines, 10% on levers, 6% on mixed methods, 3% on punch cards, and less than half of one percent on paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. Here are detailed plans for a fully reliable voting system:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. I'd vote for this one as long as they're hand counted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. I've rethought my answer .....
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2741003

I'm not opposed to a plain old hand counted paper ballot system .... but ......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. Maybe this....


:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. Pen and paper ballot, hand-counted at the precinct, and telephoned in
Edited on Tue Jul-25-06 12:48 PM by seafan
to the Secretary of State's office.

The paper ballots may be provided in any language needed, including braille.



...My answer to the "how do we rescue our corrupted elections?" tsunami. And it has never wavered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. That's the only way I've ever voted
It takes longer to tally but there are checks and double checks and they can always count again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
12. paper and pen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. I like the old-fashioned lever machines
But like any system, they are susesptatble to fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC