Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Seven Years Later Wapo Scribe Admits Gore Did Not Claim To Invent Internet

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 05:24 PM
Original message
Seven Years Later Wapo Scribe Admits Gore Did Not Claim To Invent Internet
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/21/AR2006072101365.html

The inconvenient truth is that as a politician, Gore has always been more successful in a supporting role. In the Senate, he was a visionary on environmental issues, nuclear proliferation and, yes, the Internet, which he never did claim he invented.

Nice analysis by Daily Howler below.

http://dailyhowler.com/

Now they tell us! Seven years later, many major scribes, like Grunwald, seem to feel free to mention the fact that Gore never said he invented the Internet. Missing of course, is an attempt to explain why we heard, all through Campaign 2000, that Gore did make this comical statement. And yes, the public kept hearing that punishing charge right there in Grunwald’s own paper. For example, here is the Post’s Ceci Connolly in December 1999, one day after she invented another bogus claim—the claim that Delusional Gore had hauled off and said that he discovered Love Canal:

CONNOLLY (12/2/99): Add Love Canal to the list of verbal missteps by Vice President Gore.

The man who mistakenly claimed to have inspired the movie "Love Story" and to have invented the Internet says he didn't quite mean to say he discovered a toxic waste site when he said at a high school forum Tuesday in New Hampshire: "I found a little place in upstate New York called Love Canal."

Gore went on to brag about holding the "first hearing on that issue" and said "I was the one that started it all."

Simply put, that is one of the ugliest moments in recent American history. In this moment, Connolly—a journalistic disgrace throughout this campaign—invented another fake claim about Gore, a claim that would be repeated, far and wide, for the rest of Campaign 2000. If you want to know why the U.S. Army is now in Iraq, go ahead—reread those three paragraphs by Connolly, who would be drummed out of any real profession for her astonishing conduct throughout this campaign. Starting in early April 1999, Connolly just kept making up bogus claims about Gore. Result? George Bush ended up in the White House—and the US Army ended up in Iraq. If you don’t understand that chain of events, you don’t yet understand recent history.

Today, many major reporters, like Grunwald, feel free to tell us—seven years later—that Gore never said he invented the Internet. Routinely, though, they fail to answer the obvious question: Why was the public we told the opposite all through the course of Campaign 2000? In fact, Ceci Connolly’s serial inventions did send George W. Bush to the White House. Seven years later, we get one small morsel of truth: Al Gore never did claim that he invented the Internet!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. The corpmedia lies about any Dem who stands in Bush's way
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I couldn't have said it better!
If you're Gore, and are reading this revelation, it's gotta hurt.

Think of how many people died because of that lie.

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. GGGRRR!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wasn't Gore recently honored by some techie group for his role in
making the internet what it is today?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yes,
he received a WEBBIE award for his contributions to the creation of the internet as we know it today. He was the driving political force and primary champion, I believe this was the prime reason, the MCM slandered and trashed him so, because he empowered us. They wanted to remain the sole gatekeepers to the truth, making it easier to brain wash the American People to do things such as invade Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yep. I smiled when I heard about that award, but then I got p.o.'d b/c
it's a perfect example of how the other side can put a distorted truth out there and make it real.

But pretty cool that he got the award nonetheless!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #9
20. The Webby was presented to him by Vint Cerf, who indeed was one of the
fathers of the internet.

http://www.ibiblio.org/pioneers/cerf.html
It was pretty cool, and validated Gore's contribution to the medium we so depend on now.

Here's an article about it from the two pioneers of the net, Robert Kahn and Vint Cerf:

As far back as the 1970s Congressman Gore promoted the idea of high speed
telecommunications as an engine for both economic growth and the
improvement of our educational system. He was the first elected official
to grasp the potential of computer communications to have a broader impact
than just improving the conduct of science and scholarship. Though easily
forgotten, now, at the time this was an unproven and controversial
concept. Our work on the Internet started in 1973 and was based on even
earlier work that took place in the mid-late 1960s. But the Internet, as we
know it today, was not deployed until 1983. When the Internet was still in
the early stages of its deployment, Congressman Gore provided intellectual
leadership by helping create the vision of the potential benefits of high
speed computing and communication. As an example, he sponsored hearings on
how advanced technologies might be put to use in areas like coordinating
the response of government agencies to natural disasters and other crises.

As a Senator in the 1980s Gore urged government agencies to consolidate
what at the time were several dozen different and unconnected networks into
an "Interagency Network." Working in a bi-partisan manner with officials
in Ronald Reagan and George Bush's administrations, Gore secured the
passage of the High Performance Computing and Communications Act in
1991. This "Gore Act" supported the National Research and Education
Network (NREN) initiative that became one of the major vehicles for the
spread of the Internet beyond the field of computer science.

As Vice President Gore promoted building the Internet both up and out, as
well as releasing the Internet from the control of the government agencies
that spawned it. He served as the major administration proponent for
continued investment in advanced computing and networking and private
sector initiatives such as Net Day. He was and is a strong proponent of
extending access to the network to schools and libraries. Today,
approximately 95% of our nation's schools are on the Internet. Gore
provided much-needed political support for the speedy privatization of the
Internet when the time arrived for it to become a commercially-driven
operation.

There are many factors that have contributed to the Internet's rapid growth
since the later 1980s, not the least of which has been political support
for its privatization and continued support for research in advanced
networking technology. No one in public life has been more intellectually
engaged in helping to create the climate for a thriving Internet than the
Vice President. Gore has been a clear champion of this effort, both in the
councils of government and with the public at large.

http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/200009/msg00052.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. Thank you for this post NYCGirl
This is much better than my lame attempt at explaining it.:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. You're very welcome! NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. Too little, too late!
Assholes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durrrty libby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. I truly hope Gore gets some redemption
in 08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. It's about time
Why do some of these reporters still have jobs? Cici is one of the worst. She and Karen Tumulty seemed to work together to destroy Gore and his reputation.

Now if they start admitting some of the other shit they've done as reporters we're getting somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Keep your fingers crossed Mabus,
I believe the dam is about to break. An Inconvenient Truth is opening many eyes not just to global warming, but also as to our dysfunctional press. When you see stats such as 928 to 0 peer reviewed scientific studies claiming global warming is real and induced by human activity and yet only 53% of our news stories report this, something has to give.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I had hoped it would break open after Katrina
But now it looks like Katrina was the just the first step. In the end, te beauty of it is that the people have changed their minds about Gore and the media is going to try to cover their asses with articles like this. Let the finger pointing begin!

I also think this says a lot about how people's attitudes toward Gore is changing. Remember when all they wanted was for Gore to go away? Now, because of An Inconvenient Truth, the media has to do stories on Gore because the people want it. Gore has talked about media disintermediation. It is what Current TV is all about. Since AIT came out more and more people are seeing who Gore really is and they like him. Gore's current popularity has to be driving so-called reporters like Kit, Cici and Karen up the wall.

BTW, that Grunwald article is horrible. Saying that Gore should do what he's good at - playing second fiddle. Screw that. Gore is a leader, not a follower.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #7
26. Why do they still have jobs???
Are you kidding??? They still have jobs because they did their masters' bidding, that's why.

Now, if they had done their jobs according to the old, quaint journalistic standards, where, for example, they would have pointed out that Gore never said he invented the Internet, thereby keeping GWB out of the White House, then, they would not still have their jobs.

That is how it works these days, and that is how our "free press" has become the joke it is today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. Sometimes we journalists make this s****t Up, sorry if you
were inconvenienced, but now that lawyers are antsy about lawbreaking we thought
we have an epiphany before we get sued for slander
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
12. Gee, that was practically timely. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
14. Can someone come out and explain, why couldn't Gore come out and
clear this up in a timely manner back in 2000? Or was that back when Democrats thought the average voter was capable of separating the slime from the facts on their own?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. It's those experts, they listen to them too
The ones that keep telling us we should appreciate Lieberman because he a good democrat.
Ignore the rabid ads, show that you are above that, when if you don't respond you appear
weak or guilty in some way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theanarch Donating Member (523 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. actually, he did...
...but every time he corrected the record, those (the M$M) who reported these corrections bleated the chorus that "Gore lied, and now he's lying about having lied" or some such idiocy. Make no mistake: for whatever reason, in 2000, the media fix was in for Junior, and sliming Gore was but one aspect of it. As per Maureen Dowd's column of 7/23, it's obvious that covering up Junior's, ahem, "lack of gravitas" during the 2000 campaign was another aspect of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. They tried but the media wouldn't have any of it
He tried but the media wasn't having any of it. They had already decided that they didn't like Gore and they wanted everyone else to feel the same way.

As the media clamor arose about Gore's supposed claim that he had invented the Internet, Gore's spokesman Chris Lehane tried to explain. He noted that Gore "was the leader in Congress on the connections between data transmission and computing power, what we call information technology. And those efforts helped to create the Internet that we know today."

There was no disputing Lehane's description of Gore's lead congressional role in developing today's Internet. But the media was off and running.

Routinely, the reporters lopped off the introductory clause "during my service in the United States Congress" or simply jumped to word substitutions, asserting that Gore claimed that he "invented" the Internet which carried the notion of a hands-on computer engineer.

***
Yet, faced with the national media putting a hostile cast on his Internet statement -- that he was willfully lying -- Gore chose again to express his regret at his choice of words.

Now, with the Love Canal controversy, this media pattern of distortion has returned with a vengeance. The national news media has put a false quote into Gore's mouth and then extrapolated from it to the point of questioning his sanity. Even after the quote was acknowledged to be wrong, the words continued to be repeated, again becoming part of Gore's record. http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/020100a.html


I truly believe that if Gore tried to deny it any more often or any more vehemently that the press would have had another excuse to question Gore's sanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. The lies were sometimes vague and constantly repeated
Gore's denials weren't given proportionate coverage - sound familiar? The media was less obvious in 2000 than in 2004, but like in 2004, they played with the accusations even after they knew they were false. In both cases, they stole key, well earned assets of the Democrats - Gore was a serious, visionary leader and expert on global warming and the internet and Kerry did demonstate leadership, courage and heroism in Vietnam. This let Bush, who had no known expertise, no vision, and no positive personal characteristics the chance to win.

The thing to take away is that the media had no concern with damaging the reputations of two good public servants and they will likely try to do it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlGore-08.com Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. Gore and tons of surrogates did - - including Cerf and Newt Gingrich
The MSM totally ignored the truth, no matter who told them.

You can't blame Gore, because they did the same thing to every other Democrat for years before and after. It didn't matter who or how the press was given the truth, they would ignore it completely. One of the more bizarre examples was during a Presidential news briefing, Bill Clinton pulled out a copy of the Pillsbury Report, and explained that the report exonerated him from any wrong doing in Whitewater, and challenged the assembled White House Press corps to report that the Pillsbury report even existed. Clinton told them that he knew none of them ever would. The reverse psychology didn't work either. None of the press mentioned the incident or the Pillsbury Report and to this day the MSM continues to report that Clinton had done something wrong in Whitewater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southsideirish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #14
29. I always wondered about that, too. Also, Howard Dean about the "scream"
we all know NOW that it was a case of him being given the wrong type of mike for a large group and it wasn't meant to be a "speech to the nation" but instead was just a rally to pep up his campaign workers. I'm sure he could have gotten some tech types together in a press conference situation to back him up. i know Diane Sawyer stated shortly after the big stink about it that she knew right away he had the wrong type of microphone for addressing a large, noisy crowd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
19. Thousands upon thousands will never see this...
...and will continue to believe the lie.

Far too little, far too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
22. One day they'll "confess" about Swift Boating Kerry
The kinda-sorta apologies always come too little, too late, after the damage is done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sweet Freedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
23. Now posted in the DU debunker...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. Thank you dist22dem
for putting that in the D.U. debunker, I believe we will not lack from material to put in there as time goes by.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
24. Well now...
... I think there are a lot of reasons for that. First I think there are a lot of disruptors and trolls infesting this board, and I won't apologize for not treating them with kid gloves.

Secondly, for me personally, there is a creeping frustration that as the Bush administration proves daily that every thing they do is an abject failure, nothing is changing. They are rolling along with very little resistance, and I'm sick of it. So no doubt my frustration with the total IMPOTENCE of the Democratic party to so much as throw down a banana peel here and there is beginning to make me really pessimistic.

And that reduces my patience. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
30. I still hear Rupubes say that to this day.
I'm sure they'll stop it now.

NOT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC