Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

H.R. 3282

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 09:31 PM
Original message
H.R. 3282
Received an email from AAUW (American Association of University Women) regarding H.R. 3282 which would:



This bill would require Congress to vote up or down on proposals of the sunset commission to eliminate programs and agencies. There would be no opportunity for amendments or public input. There would be no limit to the programs targeted by the sunset commission. Education and job training programs such as Perkins college loans and Pell grants would be subject to elimination as would retirement security programs such as Social Security and Medicare.

AAUW opposes this bill and other sunset commission bills because rather than evaluating programs in the light of day through the authorization and appropriations process as is done now, this commission would push the reorganization and termination process behind closed doors to be conducted by unelected and unaccountable political appointees.




So this could very well be their back door to eliminating programs like Social Security and Medicare as well as any other program they deemed unnecessary. Programs that have been fought for and won would have to pass again. No input from the citizens.

http://capwiz.com/aauw/issues/bills/?bill=8923291





You can put in your zip to check and see how your congressperson voted and send the action letter that they provide.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PuraVidaDreamin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. When will the people rise up?
I intend to ask this question daily!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hey Night Owl anything you can find on Hastert please send
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. All I could find is that he was not
a co-sponsor of the bill.
http://capwiz.com/aauw/bio/sponsortrack/?id=227

But it doesn't say if he voted for it or not. You can write and ask what his stance is though.
This is the form I got for my gem of a rep:

http://capwiz.com/aauw/mailapp/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Whaaaaat ??? - Check Out What Thomas (Library of Congress) Says:
H.R.3282

Title: To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 400 North Main Street in Butte, Montana, as the "Mike Mansfield Federal Building and United States Courthouse".

Sponsor: Rep Rehberg, Dennis R. (introduced 11/13/2001) Cosponsors (None)
Latest Major Action: Became Public Law No: 107-178

Link: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d107:h.r.03282:

But then they have this: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.R.+3282:

But the full text of the bill is here.

PDF Link (full text of Bill): http://www.ombwatch.org/regs/2005/incongress/sunset/hr3282-intro.pdf

<snip>

109TH CONGRESS
1ST SESSION H. R. 3282

To provide for the periodic review of the efficiency and public need for
Federal agencies, to establish a Commission for the purpose of reviewing
the efficiency and public need of such agencies, and to provide for
the abolishment of agencies for which a public need does not exist.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
JULY 14, 2005

Mr. BRADY of Texas (for himself, Mr. BAKER, Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey,
Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. MCHENRY, Mr. MCCAUL of Texas, Mr. GILLMOR,
Mr. HERGER, Mr. OTTER, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. PORTER, Mr. BURGESS,
Mr. CARTER, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia, Ms. FOXX,
Mr. BLUNT, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. BASS, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. STEARNS, Mr.
ISTOOK, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. HEFLEY, Mr. PENCE, Mr. SULLIVAN,
Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. EDWARDS, Mr.
PITTS, Mr. TERRY, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. FEENEY, Ms. GINNY BROWNWAITE
of Florida, Mr. THORNBERRY, and Mr. MARSHALL) introduced
the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Government
Reform

<snip>

From PDF.

:wtf: That original title is pretty misleading. Are the rePukes censoring the Library of ongress now too?!?!

:mad::nuke::mad:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thank brother I needed this big time
John Laesch call Hastert out to debate if he does not show we have a cut out and a empty chair on the air

www.john06.com

Hastert in trouble in his district we might have a vet who can beat him. That would be a huge win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-25-06 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Anytime !!!
:hi:

Peace...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WePurrsevere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-26-06 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
7. They don't need any more ways to be sneaky. This is BS...
:kick: and Rec'd for the morning crowd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC