|
Your use of the phrase "same-sex marriage", shows that you've entirely missed the point of my post, which is, that by insisting on using the term "Marriage", we as advocates a) blur the distinction between Civil (secular) institutions and Religious sacraments, b) enflame the passions of those who might, otherwise, be supportive of the basic CIVIL rights concept, and c) put the State in the position of having to define the difference(s) between civil institutions and religious sacraments. I say again: we need to be far more careful of our semantics, far more precise in our terminology, so as to cease providing ammunition for our opponents, and to cease diffusing our focus. What we must pursue, with diamond focus and total commitment, is the adoption, by the State, of the Domestic (or Civil) Partnership, as the ONLY recognized familial union. Let those who require the blessing of their Church seek it within their Sacrament of Marriage, but if they want their union recognized by the State, want the legally protected benefits {tax status, medical and other fiscal benefits, inheritance, custody rights, et al.} conferred by such recognition, let THEM register their Domestic (or Civil) Partnership as well... ... and let us be more deliberate with our own use of language.
|