TPM Cafe: New York Times to endorse Ned Lamont

[Totally Committed]

http://electioncentral.tpmcafe.com/blog/electioncentral/2006/jul/29/times_endorses_lamont

The New York Times, in an editorial published on Sunday, endorsed Mr. Lamont over Mr. Lieberman, arguing that the senator had offered the nation a “warped version of bipartisanship” in his dealings with President Bush on national security

YES!!!!!!

TC

[skeeters2525]

1. Yawn

And the New York Times will lie to start the next war.

Sick of Lamont. Aren't the other races out there.

And really don't give a chit what the New York Slime says.

And yes, Lamont is better the Lieberman, blah, blah, blah.

[rhombus]

2. Wow, you sound like one bitter individual

Get out, get some sunshine, and put some Jergens on your skin. And smile.


Great news for Lamont! Lets hear it from Holy Joe whining about those "angry" bloggers who are after him. Joe, Connecticut is after you, not some angry bloggers.

[TayTay]

5. Why don't you get off your ass and tell us about a better race

Instead of complaining that no one has brought a better issue to your attention. So sorry to hear that one of the most exciting races in recent democratic primary history is a bore to you. Perhaps you can enlighten us as to what you consider a better topic to discuss in the remaining Dem primaries. (Or perhaps just sitting there waiting for the news to come to you is your preference. Hmmm, so many races, so many hours to not give a shit and just complain.)

[n2doc]

3. funny, they (nyt) sure posted a puff piece today for joementum

About made me upchuck...

[calico1]

4. The editorial staff and the

"reporting" staff don't always agree. Which is why the Times often seems inconsistent.

I am glad they are supporting Lamont.