Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lamont needs some DU help.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
femmedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 12:59 PM
Original message
Lamont needs some DU help.
Edited on Sun Jul-30-06 01:05 PM by femmedem
The Hartford Courant endorsed Lieberman today, calling him an antacid amongst today's corrosive politics. Okay, I could use an antacid myself after reading that.

So, can we write some Letters to the Editor refuting this nonsense? A whole pile of DU love letters for Lamont?

Talking points, anyone?


http://www.courant.com/news/opinion/editorials/hc-senate-endorse,0,1712552.story?coll=hc-utility-home
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. the Courant endorsed Bush over Kerry
you should include that in your letter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Good point. CT hates Bush. Thanks. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. Not to mention Rowland... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarkDevin Donating Member (529 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. They also endorsed John Rowland.
And we all know how beautifully that worked out! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Here's a recent letter from Sen. Boxer on Joe's environmental
record (she lauds him):

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=2745161

snip//

So why did I go to Connecticut? When Joe asked me to tell his constituents about our work together on the environment and choice, I told him I would.

I realize this decision has deeply disappointed you. I completely understand your position and only hope that you will come to understand mine.

For 14 years, Joe Lieberman and I have shared an alliance on a range of progressive issues, especially two that are central to my public service -- the environment and choice.

We have worked side by side on the Senate's Environment and Public Works Committee. When Bill Clinton was President, the stakes weren't nearly as high. But within hours of President Bush taking office, the environment was under attack.

Believe me, it has not been easy to fight the Bush Administration and the Republicans on this committee who try to undermine the environment, and its supporters, at every turn.

I know that's not news to you. But what you might not know about is the critical role that Joe has played in this battle.

The fact is, on every single fight I have waged on that committee -- from arsenic in the water, to air pollution, to pesticide testing on infants and children, to global warming, to Superfund and much more -- Joe has been a stalwart partner and leader.

Joe was the first author of legislation to permanently protect the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. He was one of the first Senators to try to tackle the global warming challenge. The Republicans laughed at his efforts and refused to admit that we were right on this issue. But Joe was undeterred.

snip//
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. With Ned, she'd get support for all that and much more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Agreed. So sad she's for Lieberman. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Ah, it's faith-based leftism (snicker).
Actually, the Unknown Millionaire's boosters have NO fucking idea what his actual position would be...he's got no public record on ANY issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Hey, you! Where's my Almond Joy? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Hope all the scribblers all around the country
will include a line complaining that "outsiders" are trying to influence voters in Connecticut...(snicker)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. There are plenty of outsiders trying
to influence the primay in favor of Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #28
36. And plenty more pimping for the Unknown Millionaire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. Good point. I should mention that 80% of Joe's pac $ is from out of state
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. Hey, feel free to mention anything
Edited on Sun Jul-30-06 07:39 PM by MrBenchley
Wonder how much of the Unknown Millionaire's support is from out of state?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. The known and disappointing millionaire's at 82% out of state
while the successful and energetic Ned got 70% from out of state.

That's for May and June-
http://www.stamfordadvocate.com/news/local/scn-sa-lieberman2ajul21,0,5176430.story?coll=stam-news-local-headlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarkDevin Donating Member (529 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. But Lamont's donations came from private citizens, not...
...corporations and PACs. Where has Lieberman's money come from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. LOL!
Yeah, the Unknown Millionaire's been a big success selling security systems for the ultrarich in their gated communities....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. aw, c'mon Bench, you're just mad because everyone is avoiding you!
At least I gave you a nice rejoinder!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. No, I'm just amused by the far left's hypocrisy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #22
33. No, no snickers! I ordered Almond Joys!
What's the matter with you, Benchley? Why don't you follow orders?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
38. Lamont's leading HolyWarJoe, Benchers.
There's really no way you can seriously still claim he's unknown.

And there's no reason for anyone anymore to think Lieberman is a better Dem than Lamont. Simply none.

Enjoy losing on August 8th.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thank you. I just edited my post
and deleted the environmental question, so future readers might wonder what you are posting about! It looks like I'll steer clear of any environmental discussion in my own LTTE. There are plenty of reasons to opppose Joe, but it looks like his environmental record isn't one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. Dear Hartford Courant:
Edited on Sun Jul-30-06 01:22 PM by longship
"We need an antacid for the dearth of Legislative Branch checks and balances on this recklessly incompetent administration. Ned Lamont is that antacid."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. O excellent! Will you be writing that yourself or may I use it? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. Lieberman Is The Courant's Favorite kind of Democrat: a Republican.
Poor Ned didn't stand a chance. I might have worried a bit, actually, if he had gotten the endorsement over Lieberman.

The Courant endorsed Bush, to, btw.

How do the actual CT voters here feel about it?

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. CT DU'er here...
I don't think this endorsement surprises anyone. They endorsed GWB both in 2000 and 2004. I would rather have the NYTimes endorse Lamont and the Courant Lieberman than the other way around. I have a feeling that so would Lieberman. I read the NLDay and the Norwich Bulletin because they are from my area. Most people in CT will read their local papers too. The NYTimes is popular in all parts of the State, not so much the Courant. So its better for Lamont to get the Times endorsement, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Absolutely! But the Courant has plenty of readers, too
and this editorial is begging for numerous rebuttals. Not everyone knows how RW the Courant has become. BTW, we are probably neighbors. I live in New London.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. I live in Gales Ferry. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. How do the CT voters feel about the editorial?
Or about the primary? CT Dems favor Lamont, although he's by no means a shoe-in to win the primary. And Lieberman is suddenly working harder. He seems to have an organized letter writing campaign now, and a Lieberman volunteer even knocked on my door a few nights ago, asking if Joe could count on my vote. I should add, I live on an out-of-the way, mostly ignored side street locally infamous for drug deals and frequent shootings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eggplant Donating Member (395 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. Am I the only one to notice the odd choice of the word "corrosive"?
Rove used that very same word just the other day, when blaming the media for everything that is wrong with our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
37. Welcome to DU!
I thought that was odd, myself. I didn't know it was the new Republican word of choice. I think that in my LTTE I'll have to point out a few things that Senator Lieberman has helped to corrode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. Lamont needs a barrage of last minute ads.
Being on the other side of the country, all I can do is send $$$ (which I have).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Letters to the Editor are the cheapest ads around. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. indeed they are

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Ned has a rapid response team
I noticed 2 LTTEs in the Register today for Ned (also 2 for Lieberman). I'm calling for him instead. It takes me too long to write a LTTE (I tend to be a perfectionist which I know is bad)and I can just go in to his hq and call and talk to people personally and spread the word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. I have those perfectionist tendencies too!
That's one reason I asked for help with talking points. I could easily spend 6-8 hours writing a good LTTE. I'm working three jobs right now and don't have the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
23. I would, but I'm from Louisiana so I doubt they would print it
Here's a short piece I've writtten on Lieberman.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2743644

The endrosement from the Hartford Courant mostly addresses Lieberman's seniority. My piece doesn't do that. They would simply say that because I'm from Louisiana, my opinion isn't important because I won't be effected by the seniority that Connecticut will lose if Lieberman isn't re-elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. I remember your piece. Thanks for the reminder.
Lieberman using his national recognition to undermine the Democratic Party positions is an excellent point.


Too bad you're probably correct that a LTTE from Louisiana wouldn't carry much weight, because you have a great ability to make your point without using inflammatory, off-putting rhetoric.

On second thought, a letter from LA just might remind people about what we don't have money for, because of all the money we keep spending on the war.

Speaking of which, anyone here know how much Lieberman had to do with linking FEMA with Homeland Security?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarkDevin Donating Member (529 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
24. That's OK. The New York Times endorsed Lamont.
Whose endorsement do you think we should take more seriously?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
31. The Washington Post endorsed Lieberman today -
but I wonder just how much - if any - influence these out of state endorsements carry for either candidate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-30-06 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Nah, just insider baseball n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC