Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McKinney-Johnson Debate - C-Span (Today - 7:30 pm et)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 08:05 AM
Original message
McKinney-Johnson Debate - C-Span (Today - 7:30 pm et)
Edited on Mon Jul-31-06 08:08 AM by welshTerrier2
Debate: Democratic Primary Runoff Debate

C-Span - Monday - 7:30 pm eastern time


Atlanta Press Club
Georgia Public Television
Atlanta, Georgia (United States)
ID: 193569 - 07/31/2006 - 0:30 - NS

McKinney, Cynthia U.S. Representative, D, Georgia (State)

Johnson, Hank Commissioner, D, DeKalb County, GA

Rep. Cynthia McKinney and DeKalb County Commissioner Hank Johnson will debate for the Democratic nomination in Georgia's 4th Congressional District.

Voters in Georgia's 4th District will vote on Tuesday, August 8th in this primary run-off. Neither candidate received the required majority in the July 18, 2006, Democratic primary.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. please kick this a few times to spread the word ...
thanks ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's 4:30 pm my time.
I'm not done for the day at that point, but I'll check in if I can.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. they'll probably rerun it again later ...
check www.c-span.org for updates on their schedule ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. McKinney might even show up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. well, i hope she does ...
Edited on Mon Jul-31-06 01:48 PM by welshTerrier2
frankly, i know very little about these two beyond McKinney's "big mouth" reputation ... i vaguely recall her hosting a hearing on the NO disaster with a bunch of women who testified ... some of it was very moving and i think it was great that she gave them a forum to speak ...

it should be interesting ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
klook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. McKinney is a tireless champion for justice
In this post I outlined some reasons why she deserves our support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
God Almighty Donating Member (264 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Cynthia is one of the greatest leaders of all time.
Unfortunately, the Republicans have found that they can get better results by voting in our primaries and by joining our discussions than by winning honestly. I hope that Bush's ace Johnson joins the Bush gang when the convictions are handed down. He's backed by polluters, Republicans and Diebold and anyone voting for him is voting in support of polluters, Republicans and Diebold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GAPeace Donating Member (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Don't forget practically the entire media
Which is all overwhelmingly acting in favor of Johnson, because it doesnt pay any attention to McKinney unless she's having a non-scuffle with a cop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GAPeace Donating Member (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. The good things she does are rarely covered by the MSM
Every 2 years some personal mishap of hers becomes national news. Her standing beside every oppressed people in the world every chance she gets -- doesn't get into the media except in the form of the Sundance-award winning film American Blackout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. kick-o-rino ...
btw, you should be able to watch this on the net on www.c-span.org for those of you who actually did kill your televisions ...

i'm not sure exactly why but watching on the net is considered a little more "pc" ... pun intended ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. it's ...
showtime !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. McKinney is the more polished speaker - for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. i was totally disgusted by both of them and the panel too ...
Edited on Mon Jul-31-06 06:59 PM by welshTerrier2
there was almost no discussion at all about the issues facing the country ... a minor mention of education and healthcare but nothing substantive ...

99% of that debate was pure attack politics and both the panel and the candidates raised virtually nothing of value ...

there are all sorts of issues facing the country, and i'm sure there are special concerns in their district, but almost nothing of substance was discussed ... the whole thing was about who funded whom or who got or gave special treatment ...

that was absolutely the most pathetic debate i've ever seen ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I agree, virtually a worthless debate
Johnson: "Two thirds of her donators are from California and Nevada"

McKinney: "He gets money from Republicans"

They could have played those comments over and over like that Head On commerical, and you wouldn't have missed anything important.

McKinney was generally on the defensive, which can't help her if it's true she is trailing. There was almost nothing of substance but along with the funding issue she was asked to explain missing votes and not participating in debates, prior to the primary. I was expecting much more scrutiny of Johnson's views, and his qualifications to be a congressman.

Seemed to me McKinney was trying to soften her image by smiling plenty and not using harsh terms, or at least not as often as she would normally prefer. Johnson's personality might play a part in that. He's a slow talking Southern black gentleman type, and I don't think it would come across great if someone ripped into him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #12
21. I never did figure out WTF head on is!
Nice to see ya around Awsi. I still like your political analysis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. HeadOn is mostly wax
It's like taking diluted Chapstick and on rubbing it on your forehead.

Of course, I went thru five or six tubes before figuring that out.

Thanks fujiyama. I like your stuff also.

I don't know if I analyze anything but you can fool people by citing numbers:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. KickarooKyay! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
God Almighty Donating Member (264 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. McKinney really did well and Johnson should join Repub party
Land fills and Republicans backing him. Yuck.

Cynthia was great. Loved her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GAPeace Donating Member (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. And conservative Georgia Democrats
The guys who are definitely Republican-lites.

Oh and Neil Boortz. That's worse than a Coulter endorsement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Howza bout some details on why you feel that way..
Edited on Mon Jul-31-06 09:40 PM by larissa
Since some of us didn't see it..



edit to add: That was for 'God Almighty' who had a negative opinion on one, and a positive on the other..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
19. My observation.
Edited on Mon Jul-31-06 11:03 PM by AtomicKitten
Having watched the debate, I found McKinney combative and snippy and, although I have no doubt she has been the victim of rampant racism in her lifetime, she has become a caricature of a someone bullies poke with sticks just to hear her go off.

I suspect those other than her most ardent admirers might be put off by her demeanor as well.

This is subjective, an observation, but it wouldn't be DU if I wasn't flamed for my audacity in posting it. Have at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-31-06 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. flame you?



...... not a chance!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. Stances on issues are irrelevant,
aren't they?
What's important is whether or not a candidate is a nice person to have a beer with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. they probably don't differ much on the issues
I'm basing that supposition on McKinney's reputation and her support on DU and a glance at Johnson's website.

I understand your point, and it is especially important in general elections, when voters often dismiss true substantive issues in favor of silly ones. (true story -- I was canvassing for Kerry and a woman told me that she was voting for bush because he was "pro-choice." I politely corrected her and she said, "oh. well, I'm voting for him anyway.") But in this case, I doubt McKinney and Johnson would vote differently on much, if anything.

If I were a voter in that district, I would have to base my vote on who I thought would do a better job representing me on fairly superficial issues because I don't believe substantive issues would differ much.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. No, issues aren't irrelevant
Edited on Tue Aug-01-06 12:54 PM by AtomicKitten
but I always love dramatic responses nonetheless.

Considering the candidates were throwing feces at each other and nothing substantive was accomplished regarding discussion of actual issues, and considering that Ms. McKinney simply cemented her image of being fractious (deserved or not), if I looked to that ridiculous debate as the basis of my choice on election day, I'd go with the candidate with the less obnoxious demeanor.

Analysis of a debate usually doesn't include which candidate one prefers, at least if one is trying to be objective.

Sorry if my observation of the impression it left puts a monkey wrench in your cheerleading.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. review from today's AJC:
In their first face-to-face televised debate, U.S. Rep. Cynthia McKinney and Hank Johnson, the local politician who forced her into Democratic runoff, traded verbal jabs Monday on her voting record and his past financial problems.

McKinney pounced on Johnson's past debts, including a bankruptcy and overdue taxes, which the inumbent highlights in a new 60-second radio ad. The spot also accuses Johnson of ethical violations while he was a DeKalb County commissioner, claiming he accepted a $1,000 campaign contribution from landfill developers.

The congresswoman appeared at ease throughout the debate, often telling the panelists she was happy they asked a particular question and flashing her wide smile. She often cut in, asking if she could respond to Johnson's charges. The former commissioner, by contrast, appeared more reserved.

http://www.ajc.com/news/content/metro/dekalb/stories/0731metdebate.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LincolnMcGrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Where are all the dlcentrist -zellocrats who denied Hank's sordid
past at now?

You should start a new thread with this I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickshepDEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
26. Did McKinney keep her hands to herself?
Just asking...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LincolnMcGrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Did Hank break any ethics rules?Did the IRS put a Lien on his jacket?
Just Asking...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC