On an obscure message board that I freqent, someone posted the following Buckly quote:
"It challenges the imagination to wonder productively what will be the political declamations at the Democratic convention in 2008 if the Democrats are to be the party that kicked out sitting Sen. Joe Lieberman six years after he was named their vice presidential candidate, notwithstanding that 90 percent of his Senate votes have been with his party, opposing President Bush."
— National Review's William F. Buckley
Here's my reply:
>>It challenges the imagination<<
If Mr. Buckley ever had an imagination, it's obviously gone, now.
It's no secret that Lieberman's support for Bush's "stay the course" policy of continued failure in Iraq has cost him support, and the "libruhl media" spares no effort to see that the lion's share of Americans believe that's the only issue.
But what you, Mr. Buckley, and the "libruhl media" all fail to take note of is the continual backstabbing of the Democratic party by Mr. Lieberman since the election of 2000.
It may be true that "90 percent of his Senate votes have been with his party, opposing President Bush", but when it really mattered he was used by the GOP to project the false image of "bipartisanship" in the most divided congress that I have seen in my lifetime. The same can be said of the "moderate" Republican senators like Lincoln Chaffee. When push comes to shove, they will support the party, and we have two of the worst SCOTUS judges in history to show for it.
I find his use of the phrase "sitting Senator" particularly comical when he fails to take note of the fact that 25 GOP Representatives, and 5 GOP Senators (Mike DeWine, OH Jon Kyl, AZ Rick Santorum, PA Olympia Snowe, ME Craig Thomas, WY) running hard for re-election signed the "contract on America" in 1994 pledging to limit all legislators to 12 years of service. Now, "sitting Senator" is used as if it's Mr. Lieberman's "right" to hold onto his seat and the "contract" is long forgotten.
If I had to sum up Bush, the GOP, and the current one-party government in a single phrase I might be tempted to use this one: "If you disagree with us your opinion doesn't matter." Liberals, progressives, Democrats, and anyone who sees another way to solve the myriad problems this nation faces are demonized not only by the ever-present right wing noise machine, but by our government itself.
The message has been sent, and it has been received loud and clear. If you are of "the left" or "the center" you don't matter to this government. The extreme right will accept no compromise, and as long as they hold power they will TELL US how things are going to be.
"Sit down and shut up" is not an acceptable policy, foreign or domestic.
I have a hard time believing that the Democrats will retake the congress in 2006, but you can only "margerineralize" the majority for so long before they will react forcefully at the polls, and there is no doubt that the American people are disatisfied with this President and this congress.
Your extremist views may hold sway a while longer. Hopefully, extremist government will end in 2006, but the day of reckoning is coming, sooner or later.
This is OUR country, too.