Official Results Websites

[EarlG]

Connecticut Primary Results
http://www.statementofvote-sots.ct.gov/StatementOfVote/WebModules/ReportsLink/USSenCountyView.aspx?Parameter=08/08/2006-Primary

Alternate CT results (the SoS site is apparently crashing)
http://www.wfsb.com/politics/9641261/detail.html

All Connecticut Primary Results
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/elections/2006/by_state/CT_Page_0808.html?SITE=CTHARELN&SECTION=POLITICS

Georgia Primary Runoff Results
http://www.sos.state.ga.us/elections/election_results/2006_0808/default.htm

Michigan Primary Results
http://www.battlecreekenquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060808/NEWS01/60808002

Feel free to add more if you've got 'em.

[bigwillq]

1. Thanks EarlG!

:hi:

[p12psicop]

8. I get nothing from this link

http://www.statementofvote-sots.ct.gov/StatementOfVote/WebModules/ReportsLink/USSenCountyView.aspx?Parameter=08/08/2006-Primary

[morffin]

16. First returns

Ned is up 125 - 66

Champagne is on ice !

[Fleshdancer]

2. Yay! Thanks EarlG

:)

[debbierlus]

3. Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh JUST IN TIME!

Did the polls just close????



:popcorn:

[bbinacan]

4. Thanks for the info. n/t

[proud patriot]

5. Thanks

:hi:

[AtomicKitten]

6. I keep getting timed out.

If anybody gets in, please post results.

Thanks.

[NoPasaran]

10. CT tied at 0 to 0

U.S. Representative, District 4
Democrat
4% of precincts reporting Johnson 74.8% McKinney 25.2%

[AtomicKitten]

27. thanks - please update from time to time - server too busy now

eom

[im10ashus]

7. The CT link didn't work EarlG.

Do you know if that's right?

[mconvente]

9. It does work - just refresh a couple of times

Didnt work at first for me but it works now

[im10ashus]

12. Oops!

Got it.

:hide:

Thank you!

[AtomicKitten]

13. it works - it's just loading slow because of the traffic

just be patient and when you get in just keep refreshing it

[ISUGRADIA]

11. GA 4 11 of 167

http://www.ajc.com/
U.S. House - District 4 - Dem Runoff
Georgia 11 of 167 Precincts Reporting - 6.59%
Name Votes Pct
Johnson , Hank 1,000 76.34
McKinney , Cynthia (i) 310 23.66

[Buck Turgidson]

14. The CT website is getting errors.

Error

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
An unexpected error has occurred on this page.The system administrators have been notified.

The error occurred in:
http://www.statementofvote-sots.ct.gov/StatementOfVote/WebModules/ReportsLink/USSenCountyView.aspx?Parameter=08/08/2006-Primary

Error Message:
A Crystal Reports job failed because a free license could not be obtained in the time allocated. More licenses can be purchased direct from Crystal Decisions or through the Crystal Decisions Online Store.

I suspect that the traffic is enormous and the cheapskates who designed the software used freeware.
Or maybe they use the same hosting service as Joe!

[Hawkeye-X]

22. Too busy, I guess. Damn Republican el-cheapo government.

Server Error in '/StatementOfVote' Application.
Server Too Busy
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.

Exception Details: System.Web.HttpException: Server Too Busy

Source Error:

An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below.

Stack Trace:


System.Web.HttpRuntime.RejectRequestInternal(HttpWorkerRequest wr) +147


Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:1.1.4322.2032; ASP.NET Version:1.1.4322.2032

[GoodSpud]

15. Looks like the evil liberal bloggers got that one too....

Why can't folks size a server properly????


Error
An unexpected error has occurred on this page.The system administrators have been notified.

The error occurred in:

http://www.statementofvote-sots.ct.gov/StatementOfVote/WebModules/ReportsLink/USSenCountyView.aspx?Parameter=08/08/2006-Primary


Error Message:

A Crystal Reports job failed because a free license could not be obtained in the time allocated. More licenses can be purchased direct from Crystal Decisions or through the Crystal Decisions Online Store.


Error Stack:

CrystalDecisions.CrystalReports.Engine.OutOfLicenseException: A Crystal Reports job failed because a free license could not be obtained in the time allocated. More licenses can be purchased direct from Crystal Decisions or through the Crystal Decisions Online Store.
at .I(String , EngineExceptionErrorID )
at CheckLicenseStatus()
at CrystalDecisions.CrystalReports.Engine.FormatEngine.Refresh(RequestContext reqContext)
at CrystalDecisions.CrystalReports.Engine.ReportDocument.Refresh()
at CrystalDecisions.ReportSource.LocalReportSourceBase.Refresh(RequestContext reqContext)
at CrystalDecisions.Web.ReportAgent.r()
at CrystalDecisions.Web..RefreshReport()
at CrystalDecisions.Web.CrystalReportViewer.RefreshReport()
at Sots.WebModules.MaintManager.Web.USSenCountyView.Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e)
at System.EventHandler.Invoke(Object sender, EventArgs e)
at System.Web.UI.Control.OnLoad(EventArgs e)
at System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive()
at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain()

[depakid]

18. "Server Too Busy"

LOL.

Wake up call to the Party:

START STANDING UP FOR TRADITIONAL DEMOCRATIC VALUES AGAIN and look at the response you will get!

B-)

[cascadiance]

20. Working now... Lamont's almost doubling him up now! :)

Windham
Lieberman - 66
Lamont - 126

[smtpgirl]

58. UMM Crystal report database.

I wonder if it will be fixed or not?

Why don't vote counters use another database form?

[ISUGRADIA]

17. Try this Site for CT Results

http://www.wfsb.com/politics/9641261/detail.html

Ned Lamont 4,282 60%
Joe Lieberman 2,907 40%
Precincts Reporting - 21 out of 0 - 3%

[Pepper32]

25. Thanks

Much better... :hi:

[jpkenny]

19. Windom: Liberman = 66 Lamont = 126 nt

[Pepper32]

21. Self delete

[nam78_two]

23. Lamont 60% and Lieberman 40%

29 precincts reporting out 0-4%
Lieberman: 4586 votes
Lameont: 6814 votest

Other two sites -I get error messages-server too busy...
I wonder why ;)

[AtomicKitten]

24. now SERVER TOO BUSY warning -- please post 'em if you got 'em

eom

[dalloway]

26. alright, which of you darn bloggers is reponsible for crashing the CT site

SURELY you didn't think you should be able to CLICK on that link.

Darn those bloggers.
:sarcasm:

[nam78_two]

30. It wasn't meeee....

it was some tofu-munching, latte sipping liberal :evilgrin:


Billionaires for Bush!

[Hawkeye-X]

28. Got in Ct SoS website:

Lieberman - 281
Lamont - 426

(Middlesex County - 215 for Joe, 300 for Ned)
(Windham County - 66 for Joe, 126 for Ned)

[southern_belle]

36. I'm going pop some popcorn!!!

:bounce: :woohoo:

[morffin]

29. yeeee ha

still VERY early ...but lamont is up in the 2 Co that have started to post results.

so far... Lamont: 426 ... Lieberbush : 281

[FSogol]

31. Uh oh, Now liberal bloggers are hacking the CT website!

:rofl:

[DoveTurnedHawk]

32. Go Ned!

Let's keep the Joementum going... straight down!

DTH

[ISUGRADIA]

33. 55 precincts in CT

Ned Lamont 12,236 56%
Joe Lieberman 9,535 44%
Precincts Reporting - 55 out of 0 - 7%

[Buck Turgidson]

34. So why are the numbers different ?

The WSFB counter has a larger vote count than the official CT website. But the ratios are the same.

[dalaigh lllama]

35. Lamont 56% Lieberman 44%

from 2nd site EarlG posted:

Candidate Votes Percent Winner
Ned Lamont 12,236 56%
Joe Lieberman 9,535 44%
Precincts Reporting - 55 out of 0 - 7%

[Julius Civitatus]

37. Note, on 7% of votes counted (so far)

Just clearing it.

:hi:

[flaminbats]

38. results in Dekalb could still hurt Buckner and Johnson..

but at least one of my two primary candidates has the lead!

Hecht ran a great campaign for Lt. Governor, I hope he runs for Congress next time against Westmoreland. I think he can win in the 3rd district. Hecht is a awesome person, and the kind who should never leave politics!

[Debi]

39. WOW! 14% Reporting and Lamont ahead 57/42

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
106 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 14.17%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 25,969 57.79
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 18,968 42.21

[im10ashus]

40. Lamont is getting a little further ahead now with 14% reporting.

Lamont, Ned Dem 25,969 57.79
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 18,968 42.21


http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/elections/2006/by_state/CT_Page_0808.html?SITE=CTHARELN&SECTION=POLITICS

[doubleplusgood]

41. Lamont 56.34% w/17.11% precincts

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
128 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 17.11%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 30,219 56.34
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 23,414 43.66

[Pepper32]

42. Lamont, Ned 55.09% -189 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 25.27%

Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 40,934 55.09
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 33,375 44.91


http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/elections/2006/by_state/CT_Page_0808.html?SITE=CTHARELN&SECTION=POLITICS

[southern_belle]

43. 189 of 748 Precincts

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
189 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 25.27%

Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 40,934 55.09
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 33,375 44.91

[Debi]

44. Finally Georgia is updated

U.S. Representative, District 4
Democrat
13% of precincts reporting Votes Percentage

Henry C. "Hank" Johnson, Jr. 2,581 73.8%
Cynthia McKinney 917 26.2%

[Pepper32]

45. 253 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 33.82%

Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 55,294 54.09
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 46,941 45.91
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/elections/2006/by_state/CT_Page_0808.html?SITE=CTHARELN&SECTION=POLITICS

[southern_belle]

46. Lamont 54.09% w/ 33.82% reporting

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
253 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 33.82%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 55,294 54.09
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 46,941 45.91

[Borgnine]

47. Goddamn Internets!

How dare these new-fangled "compooters" try to subvert democracy by getting people fired up and out to vote? Next they'll expect honesty and integrity from politicians. When will the madness end?

[doubleplusgood]

48. Lamont 53.62% w / 38.37% reporting

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
287 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 38.37%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 61,449 53.62
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 53,159 46.38

[SCRUBDASHRUB]

49. Joe's Gotta Go....

[ncrainbowgrrl]

50. Missouri results here:

http://www.sos.mo.gov/enrweb/

[Pierre.Suave]

51. Anyone got a link to Ohio primary results?

That one is extremely important as well.

[ncrainbowgrrl]

52. Colorado (from a media source):

http://www.9news.com/news/elections/primaryresults.asp

[doubleplusgood]

53. Lamont 52.13% w/50.27% reporting

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
376 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 50.27%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 70,444 52.13
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 64,700 47.87

[NastyRiffraff]

54. From the Courant:

376 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 50.27%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 70,444 52.13
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 64,700 47.87

Can we break out the champaign yet? No, not yet. But it's looking good

[AtomicKitten]

56. not quite yet -- Lieberman is moving up

404 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 54.01%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 74,396 51.98
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 68,718 48.02

[Pepper32]

76. Break out the champagne!!!

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
702 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 93.85%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 134,942 51.65
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 126,330 48.35

:party::toast::bounce:

[smtpgirl]

55. Lamont is gaing monentum.

I so hope that Lamont beats Leiberman.

I think that is why Gore lost, oh, that monotone blue blood accent turns people off.

I am a Mid-Atlantic person, that nasal stuff is so stuffy.

Maybe that is why southerners win, they don't sound condescending.

But most in the south are too much shuckin' & jivin'.

Won't someone give us the "REAL DEAL"?

[Pepper32]

57. Precincts Reporting - 54.01% Lamont, Ned 51.98 %-Lieberman 48.02

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
404 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 54.01%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 74,396 51.98
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 68,718 48.02

[doubleplusgood]

59. Lamont 52.17% w / 56.55% reporting

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
423 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 56.55%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 79,580 52.17
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 72,964 47.83

[doubleplusgood]

60. Lamont 51.60% w/ 64.71% reporting

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
484 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 64.71%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 89,814 51.60
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 84,231 48.40

[XOKCowboy]

61. Latest results from Ct.

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
484 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 64.71%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 89,814 51.60
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 84,231 48.40

[Pepper32]

62. Precincts Reporting - 71.79% Lamont, Ned 51.61%

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
537 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 71.79%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 100,425 51.61
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 94,148 48.39

[Pepper32]

63. Precincts Reporting - 73.66% Lamont, Ned 51.73%

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
551 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 73.66%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 103,145 51.73
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 96,235 48.27

[Pepper32]

64. Precincts Reporting - 79.95% Lamont, Ned 51.75 %

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
598 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 79.95%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 114,165 51.75
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 106,428 48.25

[Pepper32]

65. Precincts Reporting - 81.28% Lamont, Ned 51.71%

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
608 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 81.28%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 116,387 51.71
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 108,683 48.29

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/elections/2006/by_state/CT_Page_0808.html?SITE=CTHARELN&SECTION=POLITICS

[doubleplusgood]

66. Lamont 51.71%, leads by 7,704 w/81.28% reporting

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
608 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 81.28%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 116,387 51.71
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 108,683 48.29

[doubleplusgood]

73. self delete

[lisainmilo]

67. missouri official results

http://www.sos.mo.gov/enrweb/

[Hawkeye-X]

70. Who's Bill Clinton Young?

Hmmm????

Hawkeye-X

[Pepper32]

71. I was wondering the same thing

Anyone know?

[Pepper32]

68. Precincts Reporting - 83.56% Lamont, Ned 51.88%

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
625 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 83.56%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 120,616 51.88
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 111,887 48.12

[doubleplusgood]

69. Lamont 51.88%, leads by 8,729 w/83.56% reporting

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
625 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 83.56%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 120,616 51.88
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 111,887 48.12

[Pepper32]

72. Precincts Reporting - 86.63% Lamont, Ned 51.82%

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
648 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 86.63%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 124,528 51.82
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 115,803 48.18

[Pepper32]

74. Precincts Reporting - 87.03% Lamont, Ned 51.84%

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
651 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 87.03%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 124,940 51.84
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 116,060 48.16

[Pepper32]

75. Precincts Reporting - 89.17% Lamont, Ned 51.60 %

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
667 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 89.17%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 127,786 51.60
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 119,867 48.40

[Pepper32]

77. Precincts Reporting - 93.85% Lamont, Ned 51.65

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
702 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 93.85%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 134,942 51.65
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 126,330 48.35

:bounce::bounce:

[Pepper32]

78. Lieberman concedes! YAY!

U.S. Senate - - Dem Primary
714 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 95.45%
Name Party Votes Pct
Lamont, Ned Dem 139,496 51.90
Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 129,271 48.10

:party: :party: