Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

David Sirota nails tonight's political tsunami

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 11:15 PM
Original message
David Sirota nails tonight's political tsunami
http://davidsirota.com/index.php/2006/08/08/lamonts-victory-liebermans-insult-to-democracy-the-democratic-party/

<snip>

Lamont’s Victory & Lieberman’s Insult to Democracy & the Democratic Party

At the end of every gut-wrenching horror movie, when the hero seems finally to have vanquished the enemy, there is always that last moment where the enemy, lying lifeless on the floor, finds a last gasp to fire off one final round, usually dealing a fatal blow to one of the good guys. In the incredible story that concluded tonight in Connecticut, Democratic U.S. Senate nominee Ned Lamont was the successful hero, representing the hopes and dreams or ordinary citizens by mounting a truly grassroots campaign against Joe Lieberman’s massive warchest of corporate cash and universal support from Washington, D.C.’s cabal of lobbyists, pundits and insiders. Yet, in his last coughing gasps, Lieberman is now saying he will, in fact, fire off that last spiteful round - right into the gut of the Democratic Party.

That’s right - Lieberman is announcing he will move forward with plans to abuse loopholes in Connecticut’s election laws, ignore Democratic Party voters who voted in our democratic process for change, and mount a Lieberman for Lieberman Independent bid. Yes, you read that right - the Senator who has in the final days of Democratic primary campaigning been running around claiming that he gets the message and realizes he no longer should enable George W. Bush’s right-wing agenda now is acknowledging that he will try to rely on hard-core Republican voters and moneymen in a general election contest in a desperate attempt to hold onto power.

Understand how insulting this is - Connecticut taxpayers just spent a large sum of money to hold a democratic primary election in a country founded on small-d democratic principles. An 18-year incumbent who had 100 percent name ID and a $12 million warchest (thanks to, among others, Joe’s good friends in the pharmaceutical and financial services industry) was unable to win that election. Now, instead of respecting small-d democracy or the party he has spent the last week pledging his devotion to, he’s behaving like a Third World autocrat that ignores democracy, and running to hard-core GOP voters and fundraisers in Connecticut and begging them to help him hold onto his job in the Senate club. This undemocratic chicanery from a man who has long justified his support for the Iraq War by saying he has a supposedly heartfelt devotion to spreading democracy.

Make no mistake about it - be prepared for Lieberman, the Enron lobbyists, corporate lawyers, Establishment pundits and other assorted characters in the Washington brothel to run out immediately and trumpet how incredible it was that Lieberman got so close. What they want to do is pretend that Lieberman hasn’t spent 18 years in the Senate, wasn’t have every single advantage, didn’t outspend his opponent with a massive corporate-funded warchest, and was, instead, the courageous underdog who supposedly did not arrogantly ignore mainstream public opinion with his stands pushing the Iraq War, Social Security privatization and corporate-written trade deals that sold out American jobs. That storyline provides a convenient excuse to justify Lieberman ignoring Connecticut voters, Connecticut taxpayers who funded the election, and all the democratic principles this country is supposed to be based on. It provides a consultant-packaged excuse for Lieberman to ignore voters and insult the Democratic Party by running as a party of one, and potentially throwing the general election to the Republican Party.

much more at link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. And we'll kick his ass again. We will.
Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. The voting machines may come to his aid in the general... just saying.
The ass-kicking will have to be very thorough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WannaJumpMyScooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sirota is a genius. And brave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. I like his conclusion:
"Ned Lamont is the Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate in Connecticut. Every single Democratic officeholder in this country (that means YOU Kerry, Feingold, Clinton, Edwards, Warner, et al.) has an obligation to respect the Democratic Party primary election that took place tonight, lest they too go on record as saying Democratic Party voters and America’s democratic process as an afterthought in comparison to their own personal political ambitions. Likewise, Democratic leaders in Congress now have an obligation to remove Lieberman from his committee assignments, and cut off Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee resources, now that he has officially left the Democratic Party.

This is an incredible victory tonight. Ordinary people showed that no politician - even a snake like Lieberman with every single advantage - is above American democracy. Though Lieberman and the lobbyists who are backing him would like everyone to forget about democracy, Ned Lamont tonight showed that ordinary people in this country still have power and that no Senate seat is the exclusive property of any one individual."

Well, said, Mr. Sirota.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thanks for adding that extra verbiage, very important.
Ordinary people made this happen. That's the real message here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yep, spot-on.
Go to hell, Lieberman, you traitor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
17. This is making me tear up. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 04:12 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. Frog in my throat
as the saying goes in dutch. There IS hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
32. Note how "Clinton, Kerry and others" HAVE come out to support Lamont.
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 02:03 PM by gully
It was never a question that they would. We didn't need a lecture from Sirota or anyone else.

WE realize that the Democratic Party is the best party to effect change and we have to fight from WITHIN.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
33. "even a snake like Lieberman". damn.
don't hold back, Mr. Sirota! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. Maybe 'the kiss' symbolized the selling of
Lieberman's soul to the Pukes...? Has Lieberman been on the Puke payroll all this time? Wouldn't surprise me one iota.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angus Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Email Harry Reid and other Senate leaders
We must send a barrage of emails to Harry Reid and other members of the Democratic leadership to pressure him to strip Joe of all his committees immediately. He betrayed the party tonight. No one man is bigger than the team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. "ordinary people in this country still have power "
Well,...ordinary millionaires, anyway.

But, yeah, it is a victory and Lieberman and his cronies don't like it a bit.

(And right now I have such respect for CT Dems, you could not believe.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. It says a lot that we must rely on ordinary millionaires.
There aren't many of those.

But tonight, I'm happy for this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Let's take this victory as a first step towards ...
... of, by and for.

Baby steps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'm waiting for the "Republicans for SoreLoserman" signs
:evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Man, that one has taken on new meaning, hasn't it?
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. And on a similar note
Ya never here Republicans talking about "Term Limits" now that they are in control. Talk is cheap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. You can still buy the Tshirts..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihelpu2see Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-08-06 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
12. Go to the link, its a great read, Kicked!! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
15. great article - recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
19. excellent....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
20. Damn. Just keep this kicked. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
21. Agreed, minus one thing. Conencticut will not go to the republican.
If that were a possibility, it would be very dangerous, but the republican has less than 15% of the voter's support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 04:53 AM
Response to Original message
23. Let the battle begin
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 04:56 AM by depakid
The irony is- LIEberman's last gasp is just what the DINO's dreaded- and what the real Democratic party needed. It'll nationalize the election- It'll spotlight the differences between the far right (and the DINO's who enable them) and the honest and true Democrats- those with integrity who've had to go underground all these years.

Say goodbye- Clinton and all the rest of you sell out fuckers. You're neither wanted nor needed outside of the beltway.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
24. Elected or not...
if Leiberman now runs as an independent, is there any truer proof of who Joe represents?

Hint: It is not CT Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Felinity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
25. Just like Bush
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 07:12 AM by Felinity
Bush has held himself above the law his whole life, and incessantly during his presidency. He has aggregated and wielded power for the benefit of his own personal ego.

Now Lieberman holds himself above the whole democratic system, refusing to bow to the will of the people who gave him a very cushy job for 18 years--access to big money, political power, and the opportunity to do some good in the world (not that that seemed to matter much to him of late). And now, when he's told he is no longer wanted, instead of walking away gracefully for 18 years in the limelight; he, like a child losing a board game, chooses to kick the pieces into a ditch rather that let anyone else have a win.

Dear Joe,

It's over. You had a good run. You have the best retirement deal on record at 100% of your former salary. There's a pharmaceutical, financial, or arms manufacturing company out there that will pay you big bucks to help them continue the rape of the American Treasury by corporate interests. What fun! And now you can take all your Republican cronies on golf outings on someone else's dime.

It's a brand new day. Go fish. To paraphrase your kissing buddy's mom, "We're done with you."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
26. When Lieberman fails twice he will not go down in the history books
as a good man who did some good things for the people, he'll be recorded, for all time, as a selfish twit who threw a temper tantrum and made a fool of himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quequeg Donating Member (105 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
27. I watched a FrontLine episode about Enron and Lieberman,
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 07:41 AM by Quequeg
which explained that the former 1990s SEC chairmen (Arthur Levitt) tried to push for new regulations that would separate the accounting and the auditing functions for companies like Arthur Andersen.

In the FrontLine episode, they mentioned that Lieberman blocked Levitt from doing this... No doubt, because of campaign contributions from the financial services companies.

Also, Lieberman has been a big supporter of the H-1B visa and "free trade" agreements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Very important to show the American public that this is NOT "just" about
the war. That's the way it's being presented already in the corporate press, and Lieberman's siding with Bush and the fat cats on all these other issues is being portrayed as bravely crossing the aisle to be nonpartisan on matters of principle. They will also carry on about how "left-wing extremist liberals" like Lamont want to undermine National Security because of their lack of support for Bush's war.

I already saw these elements of this Bush/Rove spin-spin-spinning in the Wash Post's announcement of Lamont's victory last night:
http://letters.washingtonpost.com/W7RH0384DD1DCC8DA227033DE2BBB0

We can expect much more, in stronger terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tbyg52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. Yup.
Every sound bite I've seen has been "war, war, war." That's *not* all it is. To put it in a nutshell, Lieberman's a jerk. Oh, and practically a Republican--that 10% his voted against the Dems on was the *important* 10%. I'm in *Texas*, for God's sake, and I could see that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. In fact, the "only 10% voting against the Dems" is a LIE- see this thread:
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 08:51 PM by Nothing Without Hope
The number of times Lieberman voted against important Dem positions and for corrupt GOP positions is far higher than 10%, which is apparently a number picked at random and driven by the media echo chamber. It's actually closer to 50%. See the link in this thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2768834
thread title (8-9-06): Judas Joe is a full on liar and I have the proof right here!:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98296 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
28. Excellent article. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
29. Sirota. We need a hundred more of him. K&R. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
31. Sirota hits another one out of the park!
Excellent article.



TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
34. so here's the thing... I'm kicking and rec'ing this one.
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
35. Excellent!
thanks for posting - recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
37. Yeah, baby!
"But as Ezra Klein astutely notes, "If this gets spun in the next few days as a microscopic margin so infinitesimal as to be mere statistical error, try and keep in mind the towering mandate the media agreed Bush had after his three — not four — percent win over Kerry." I’ll put it in exact language that Lieberman himself can understand: It’s time for Joe Lieberman and his friends in the Washington Establishment who distrust Ned Lamont and ordinary voters to acknowledge that Ned is now the Democratic Party’s nominee for U.S. Senate, and that we as Democrats undermine our nominee’s credibility at our party and our democracy’s peril."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
38. K& R!
:kick:49
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
39. I dunno...I think Lieberman is gonna look kind of pathetic now....
and have the stench of a loser. Getting re-elected should have been a walk in the park for him. His big-money supporters will show their usual heart and ditch him if it looks like he can't win.

Wishful thinking, maybe. But a few months ago I remember another DUer telling me Lamont didn't have a chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC