Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boy is CNN ever whoring for LIEberman!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:31 AM
Original message
Boy is CNN ever whoring for LIEberman!
It's sickening.

All the anallysis on how he could "pull in repukes and dems and independants", all the triangulation.

For fucking sake, you'd have thunk he WON instead of LOST to LAMONT!

Not a word about Lamont - other than his "fringe candidacy" and "anti-bush", etc, etc.

I want to vomit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. Reality has to hit them soon
Liebermann lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. That's the Corporate Media for ya!
They were a little late "pushing" for Lie-berman though....plus, it's harder for them to "influence" a Democratic Primary in one state. I'm sure that they'll try harder for the GE, as you might already know!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. Lamont won without their help the first time;
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 01:35 AM by deadparrot
he can certainly do it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Synchro1111 Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. LIE-berman
Did anyone see Colbert last night (Tuesday night)? He talked about how many times he'd invited Joe on his show and no response ever. Wonder why.

On the topic of Colbert, can anyone explain to me what the "falsiness" is that Eli Pariser from MoveOn and Al Franken claim he spreads? OK, the Wikipedia thing was dumb, but funny. It IS written by volunteer contributors - Colbert spoofs stuff, which is his whole point. Did I miss the thing that ticked MoveOn off?

Karen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. MSM sucks ass. Conservative News Network
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 01:41 AM by Nutmegger
is nothing more than rubbish which is sad because CNN use to be decent back in the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
6. Two factors in that
First, the media always seeks out controversy, and where there is little, the create it. By pushing the number two guy, the create closer races, which improves their ratings. It's why I refuse to watch television news.

Second, they pimped the war. They now have to prove that only a fringe group of Dems oppose the war strongly enough to make a difference in elections. If they can pump up Lieberman's candidacy, create a strong three person race, they can claim that the fringe element won the race, not that opposition to their war decided the race. If they could get Lieberman to win as an independent, not only would it boost the amount of time people spend watching them, but it would justify their war as mainstream.

And if they can hype Lieberman enough to split the Dem vote and get a Republican in that seat, then they've really earned their (Republican sponsored) paycheck.

So they'll hype Joe, not because they care about him (he's too moderate for their tastes), but because it fits other needs of theirs, and gives the Repubs a better shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Exactly right.
They don't hide their political bias anymore. I mean, look at the analysts...Tucker Carlson (dad's fundraising for Scooter Libby), Pat Buchanon, Joe Scarborough...no Democrats available to discuss OUR primary and OUR Party? It gets really old...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuskerDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. To be fair, all 3 of those guys have been hammering Bush.
Sure, they say nothing good about dems, but at least they don't pretend reality doesn't exist like Fox.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. True, but it is still through a Republican prism.
There is no good reason why there can't be more balance with Democratic analysts. We are way under represented in the broadcast media.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
9. Solution to the MSM
Hey, they're all Fox News.



Image from Kill Your Television

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I think I'll try that with my neighbor's TV. You know, telling them
they are all Fox News
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
survivor999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
11. The more they trash Lamont
and the more I like the guy. I hope it's the same for the CT people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I was watching Hardball yesterday ...
and it was like bizarro world ... Mathews kept doing his best to describe Lamont as some kind of WASP elitist ... Said WASP 100 different times, and managed about 20 different ways to creatively say that he was a "liberal" in the way Limbaugh framed liberals ... At the same time, he kept saying how Lieberman was an everyday Joe ...

Jesus Christ ... Are you kidding me ... I don't know what he was in the past, but today, you would be hard pressed to find a more out of touch and tone death politician than Lieberman, and Lamont is a guy who came almost literally out of nowhere, to beat an incumbant senator ...

Just freakin unreal how far up the rear ends of the republicans the MSM is ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 03:56 AM
Response to Original message
12. All hail the Crappy News Network!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC