Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wes Clark - Urge Joe Lieberman to help Democrats

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Sopianae Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 12:08 PM
Original message
Wes Clark - Urge Joe Lieberman to help Democrats
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 12:16 PM by Sopianae
I just got this email from Wespac:

On Tuesday, the message sent by Connecticut voters was loud and clear. They want change, and they want Ned Lamont to represent them in the U.S. Senate, voting for Ned by a 52% - 48% margin over Senator Joe Lieberman in the Democratic primary.

You see, despite what Joe Lieberman believes, invading Iraq and diverting our attention away from Al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden is not being strong on national security. Blind allegiance to George W. Bush and his failed "stay the course" strategy is not being strong on national security. And no, Senator Lieberman, no matter how you demonize your opponents, there is no "antisecurity wing" of the Democratic Party.

Indeed, Connecticut Democrats recognized all of this, and yesterday they chose Ned Lamont as their nominee for the U.S. Senate. Now, I hope you'll join me in supporting Ned as he heads into the general election this November.

Stand with Connecticut Democrats. Send a message to Joe Lieberman to end his Independent campaign for CT Senate.

As a Democrat, I respect the will of the Connecticut Democratic voters and their decision to make Ned Lamont their nominee. Even before the election results came in on Tuesday, Ned Lamont showed his respect for the voters by committing to abide by the Democratic primary result and support whoever won.

Joe Lieberman, on the other hand, began collecting petition signatures to run as an Independent several weeks ago while concurrently running in the Democratic primary. In short, he wanted to have his cake and eat it too.

Despite his efforts to appear on the November ballot as an Independent, I held out hope that Joe would withdraw from the Connecticut Senate race after the primary votes were counted. Unfortunately, Joe has announced his candidacy as an Independent candidate, running against Ned, the Democratic nominee.

Today, I ask you to email Joe Lieberman. Urge him to respect the will of Connecticut Democrats and end his Independent candidacy for CT Senate.

In 2000, the presence of a third party candidate, Ralph Nader, no doubt played a role in the defeat of Vice President Gore and Joe Lieberman. Now Joe Lieberman is risking our party's claim on his Senate seat by running as a third party candidate himself. Recent news reports detail the GOP's interest in supporting such an effort. It's time to draw a line.

I committed myself to supporting the Democratic nominee for the US Senate in Connecticut, and I ask you to do likewise. Because too much is at stake with our troubles abroad and at home, we cannot play games this Election Day. That's why I call on all loyal Democrats to join me in urging Senator Lieberman to drop his bid for the Senate as an Independent and endorse the duly nominated Democrat.

We should thank him for his service and invite him to stay active, or even run again someday, but as a party we cannot let Joe Lieberman be this year's Ralph Nader.

Email Joe Lieberman. Encourage him to do the right thing, withdraw from the Connecticut Senate race, and focus his efforts on electing Democrats across America.

The 2006 elections represent a real crossroads for America. We must unify our efforts to stop George Bush's radical agenda and end this one-party government. I hope Senator Lieberman will join us in this critical fight for our nation's future.

Sincerely,

Wes Clark

PS: After you send your message to Joe Lieberman, please take a moment and forward this message to every Democrat you know.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wes is very clear here........
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 12:14 PM by FrenchieCat
For the sake of your party, Joe, get the F* out.... :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. ..and AGAIN Wes proves his mettle...
Edited on Wed Aug-09-06 12:20 PM by truebrit71
...I can't WAIT til he runs again!!!

GO WES GO!!!

Oh, and I made sure to send the e-mail....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R. My note to Joe was titled: The Tribe Has Spoken.
The Tribe Has Spoken -

Why won't you respect their wishes? You have been asked to step aside by the majority of the voters in your state. Why would you risk losing the Democratic senate seat altogether unless you weren't a true blue Democrat? Your selfishness and public grab to hold onto power is an embarassment and can only do damage. If you care at all, which is now questionable, please respect the voice of your own voters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. I emailed Lieberman, and hope you all will do the same!
Joe has GOT to go!



TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. This very easy to do. Everyone should do it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. I love it when Wes refuses to mince words:
You see, despite what Joe Lieberman believes, invading Iraq and diverting our attention away from Al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden is not being strong on national security. Blind allegiance to George W. Bush and his failed "stay the course" strategy is not being strong on national security. And no, Senator Lieberman, no matter how you demonize your opponents, there is no "antisecurity wing" of the Democratic Party.

Take that Joe.

Particularly since Joe Lieberman, the Republicans' favorite "Democrat," accused Clark, several times, of being a Republican in Dem clothing during the 2004 primary debates.

Joe, you're the pot and the kettle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 03:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
22. This part smacks at the smarmy little assclown
Joe Lieberman, on the other hand, began collecting petition signatures to run as an Independent several weeks ago while concurrently running in the Democratic primary. In short, he wanted to have his cake and eat it too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas_Kat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. Fix the links
to remove this: 63nd5d4953ttix?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. Kudos to Gen Clark!
Gen Clark says to email Lieberman and urge him to end his independent campaign. Kudos to Gen Clark for remaining a strong advocate for the party and our ideals!

You always know what you will get from Gen Clark. He is above the board - just what we need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. Emailed Lieberman as suggested by Wes. Easy. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. done....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. Great job, Wes!
He's going on the "good" list :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
12. Too bad the C.T. Independent Party doesnt have class acts like Wes.
Just self serving Bush supporters with no real loyalty to Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abburdlen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. Done
Of course I had to add a reminder to Joe of his accusations that Clark joined the Democratic Party for "political convenience, not conviction".

Karma, ain't it a bitch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. That's a good letter...
...no nuances there. Clear and straight-forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. email sent, thanks for the post.
Wes is right on point, again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
16. Great statement from a TRUE moderate Dem. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judy from nj Donating Member (548 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
17. Wes just states things so well
He doesn't try and hide what he thinks. Thanks Wes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
18. Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-09-06 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
19. "And no, Senator Lieberman, no matter how you demonize your opponents"
This is the heart of the message:

"You see, despite what Joe Lieberman believes, invading Iraq and diverting our attention away from Al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden is not being strong on national security. Blind allegiance to George W. Bush and his failed "stay the course" strategy is not being strong on national security. And no, Senator Lieberman, no matter how you demonize your opponents, there is no "antisecurity wing" of the Democratic Party."

Clark is laying his four stars on the line for Lamont, against any attacks Lieberman plans to make against Lamont for being weak on National Security. It infuriates Clark that Lieberman buys Bush's agenda about what it takes to keep America secure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
20. i don't want joe anywhere near democratic candidates.
it could only hurt. he's a pariah.

yes, he should bow out. then he should go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 03:07 AM
Response to Original message
21. Done!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ochazuke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-10-06 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
23. Dems need to put pressure on Shmomentum
The people, like Clinton, who supported Joe should now demand that he accept the judgement of his party. For Lieberman to go independent is a betrayal of their support for him during the primary, since they were doing that in the understanding that Joe was a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC