AusGail
(325 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-12-06 10:06 PM
Original message |
I live in one of the best countries in the world |
|
Despite the fact that we have had an atrocious government for the last ten years, I experienced something the other night that I found quite surprising.
My husband and I went to an opening night show in Sydney (The Boy from Oz: hugh Jackman) and as we were leaving the theater we saw an ex Prime Minister of ours- Bob Hawke standing with his wife, waiting for his car to arrive. He wasn't being mobbed or bothered by anybody, I couldn't see any body guards around, he was just another Joe Citizen.
The show was brilliant, but seeing that surreal sight afterwards put icing on the cake.
I hope my country never changes (only the current government)
|
mitchtv
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-12-06 10:09 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I hope it changes enough |
|
to give Gay Australians their full rights. Fairly backward in that respect
|
AusGail
(325 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-12-06 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. While we have this government, |
|
unfortunately it wont happen. My nephew is gay and he is one my most favorite people in the world. I feel sad for him that he has to confront homophobia in his everyday life.
Didn't Bush also put a stop to gay marriages?, because thats about where Australia is up to.
|
mitchtv
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-12-06 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
Bear down under
(289 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
12. Howard's amendment to the Federal Marriage Act ... |
|
... was not an amendment to the Consitution. It can be, and in time will be, repealed by a more enlightened government. In the meantime, we can work for civil unions (on the British or NZ model) on a State by State basis.
|
AusGail
(325 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
Even if it was a situation where it was a legalized partnership, so that wills and other legal matters could be handled more simply. Unfortunately, we have at the moment a very homophobic government and I cant see any changes being made until they are voted out.
|
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-12-06 10:17 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Why would anyone want to 'mob' an ex-politician? |
|
Was he well loved? Or, I guess not! :D
|
AusGail
(325 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-12-06 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. He served as Prime Minister from 1983 to 1992 |
|
He was very well liked. He introduced medicare. That means every Australian can receive medical treatment and/or be hospitalised free of charge. He lead a left wing government (Labor) after being a trade union leader for many years prior.
|
RFKHumphreyObama
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-14-06 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
Edited on Mon Aug-14-06 01:13 AM by socialdemocrat1981
I'm not sure you would call his government left wing. He implemented a number of free market reforms, abolished free university education and replaced it with the HECS system (which is still better than what the Tories are trying to do with university education now) and aligned Australia much more closely with the US than previous Labor governments -although to his credit he did oppose Star Wars, the policies of the Reagan Administration in Latin America and its indifference toward apartheid in South Africa. He also wanted to merge the ABC with SBS and I think at one time wanted to introduce commercials on the ABC. People on this board would probably dislike him because they'd think he was a DLC-type -he'd get the same reception that Bill Clinton gets here I think
It's also true to say that much of the foundations for Medicare were under the Whitlam government. Keating actually did much more in terms of Aboriginal reconciliation in five years than Hawke did in eight years. Keating also floated the idea of an Australian Republic whereas Hawke was inclined just to let it drop because it was too controversial.
Hawke is to be given credit IMO for promoting closer engagement with the Asia-Pacific and the Third World and his passionate lifelong opposition to apartheid -a commitment that Nelson Mandela acknowledged. And for his passionate opposition to the wider concept of racism as evidenced by how he went in all guns blazing against Howard when the latter was engaged in race-baiting in the 1980s (and is still doing so now)
Don't get me wrong because I'm not criticizing Hawke for the policies I mentioned in his first paragraph-I loved Hawke and supported most of his policies. I think he was a great leader and statesman in many ways and I think his consensus-based model of government was probably what kept Labor in power for so many years and is a model that future Labor governments will probably have to adopt if they want long term power.
I'd actually describe Hawke as being on the centre right of the centre left if that makes any sense
Hawke is the only living Labor PM whom I haven't met. I'd love to some day though
|
AusGail
(325 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-14-06 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
33. From your post, I take it you must be Australian (or have close |
|
affiliations)
I met Hawke during the 1972 "Its Time" election. That was when he was secretary of the ACTU.
I think by the time Keating took over, Hawke had just about run out of steam. Keating was a PM who I admired as well. It was because of his many reforms that the Howard government is taking credit for now.
Thankyou for your response. I am a member of the Labor Party and because of that I do get to meet the occasional politician.
|
RFKHumphreyObama
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-14-06 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #33 |
36. I'm also a member of the ALP |
|
Which is actually how I came to meet most of the former PMs. Unfortunately I wasn't born during the Whitlam era -you were very fortunate to have been able to experience Whitlam's rise to power and the Whitlam government. I cannot even begin to imagine how exciting that election would have been -just watching the old reruns of the "It's Time" advertisement sends shivers down my spine because I found it so electrifying and powerful
Keating was IMO much closer to the Whitlamesque tradition than Hawke -his policies on multiculturalism, Aboriginal reconciliation, Asia-Pacific engagement and the like were things heavily emphasized under Whitlam but they seemed to assume a lower profile under Hawke -although they were still very much there. I actually was a Liberal supporter for most of the Keating government but I never disliked him to the profound extent that I do with Howard and I always knew he was doing the best thing for the country. I agree with you -Keating laid much of the groundwork for Australia's economic prospectus that Howard has taken credit for now. And the most shameful thing about it is that Labor has allowed him to do so. I remember talking to a senior Labor Party figure who said that, after the 1996 federal election, Beazley decided to disavow any of the legacy of the Hawke-Keating era in government despite people like Simon Crean arguing that Labor needed to take credit for the economic reforms that Keating pushed through. So Beazley surrended the high ground on economics to Howard, failed to answer Howard when adequately he perpetuated the myth of the "Beazley black hole" and now Labor is having a hard time proving its economic credentials because it allowed Howard to take sole credit for the economic success/low interest rates over the last eight years.
|
AusGail
(325 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-15-06 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #36 |
38. If the media gives the opposition a fair go |
|
They can now prove that people on an average mortgage are paying back a higher percentage of their income than when it was at 17%. The cost of housing has doubled, and in some cases tripled. People living in the mortgage belt are also feeling the pinch with the high cost of petrol because there is little public transport.
The 1972 election was my first one to vote in. That was back in the days when you had to be 21. I gave out "how to votes" in 1974 for Labor in the seat of Benelong. That was when Howard came in.
The way things are going at the moment, I wouldn't be surprised if Howard calls an early election in November. The signs are there..... Dropped the immigration bill Bringing in conscience vote on stem cell research More people having problems with "work choices" and "welfare to work" Iraq war lasting longer than expected He's going to bring David Hicks home if not charged soon Petrol prices skyrocketing LPG tank rebates
The signs are there
|
ChipsAhoy
(381 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
11. Bill Clinton is the answer to that question. |
|
He had many death threats by the extreme right. I'm glad he had/has Secret Service surrounding him.
|
ChipsAhoy
(381 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. Additionally, I agree with the original author's post. |
|
America IS the best country on the planet. That's why we are trying so hard to get our country BACK. I once went on a European vacation with my family when I was a teenager and getting back on American soil was the best part of the journey. Granted, the other countries were beautiful, but HOME is HOME and I couldn't wait to get back here.
|
Spider Jerusalem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
23. If you were Dutch, or British, or French, or Italian... |
|
you'd feel the same way about the Netherlands, the UK, France or Italy, I'm sure.
For most people in the Western world, 'the best country on the planet' is going to be whichever one they're from.
|
gula
(619 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-12-06 10:21 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Maybe you shouldn't use the USA as your sole comparison. |
|
I have shaken hands with our then PM (not by choice) as he was out walking with what seemed to be a friend. I also have been to several consular events by different countries without ever seeing security personal.
|
AusGail
(325 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-12-06 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Who was the Prime Minister you shook hands with? |
gula
(619 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-12-06 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. Mulroney of "Irish eyes are smiling" duo with Reagan. |
AusGail
(325 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-12-06 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. Excuse my ignorance, he was the Canadian PM? |
gula
(619 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-12-06 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
and don't feel bad. I am not exactly up on Aussie PMs.
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 03:28 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
15. And yet as US citizens |
|
we're supposed to be up on all of them or we're labeled arrogant, nationalistic, and self-involved. Hmmm.
|
AusGail
(325 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. Why shouldn't you try to keep up with world politics? |
|
Australia may only have a small population (and at the moment a shit-pot government) but I still believe we deserve the recognition of other countries. I try to make it my business to keep up with international politics, and I feel that if most people did the same, we would at least have a more informed world.
Arrogant, nationalistic and self-involved is a label that sounds appropriate to you. You may have misread my original post. I said that I live in ONE of the best countries in the world, NOT the best, as you obviously do.
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
19. Well re-read your own post |
|
You're the one who said they didn't know who Mulroney was, which was responded to by a Canadian who admitted she didn't keep up with Australian PM's either. But if people from the US don't know who every single world leader is, (which I generally do incidentally), then all hell breaks loose despite the fact that none of you know anything about each other either. That's what I said and that's all I said, not anything about any best country in the world bullshit.
|
AusGail
(325 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
20. Don't you think that you are overstating it when you say |
|
"all hell breaks loose"? I'm sorry, I didn't think it was such a sensitive issue.
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-14-06 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
24. It was a teensy observation is all |
|
But yes, US citizens take a lot of heat if we aren't relatively knowledgeable about every aspect of politics and culture for the majority of countries in the world. I'm sure you're familiar with the phrase "ugly American" and not knowing foreign leaders is part of the label. I found it quite ironic that a Canadian and Australian admit they aren't necessarily that knowledgeable either, that's all.
|
AusGail
(325 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-14-06 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #24 |
26. It is discussion boards such as this |
|
that keeps us all informed. I find it interesting to not only learn about who won what primary etc, but to find our how the average person feels about it. I could not recite to you the leader of every country in the world, but I'll never hesitate to ask, if I'm not sure.
PS
We also have "ugly Australians"
|
RFKHumphreyObama
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-14-06 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
29. Mulroney was of great assistance to the Australian Labor Party in 1993 |
|
We were in the middle of an election campaign in which our then Tory leader was trying to float a Goods and Services Tax (GST). Mulroney resigned during the middle of the campaign and the ALP was then able to float Canada as being an example of why not to have the GST. Our Tory leader started furiously backpedalling and tried to push as much distance between himself and Mulroney during the election campaign. We ended up winning that election but unfortunately we lost the next one and our current Tory government implemented the GST
Incidentally Mulroney and Hawke were close friends who worked together with Rajiv Gandhi and a few others to promote the anti-apartheid position in CHOGM
|
JohMunich99
(155 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 02:28 AM
Response to Original message |
14. Well when you are No. 1 people are going to want to take shots at you |
|
The PM of Australia, that's like single A baseball compared to America. And a FORMER PM? Oh yeah, he doesn't need security. If anything he would want a NAME ID boost.
|
AusGail
(325 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
17. It is comments like yours |
|
that give average Americans a bad reputation. Wouldn't you prefer it if your politicians didn't need security guards?
I did not put your country down and there is no need to take pot shots at mine.
|
JohMunich99
(155 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-14-06 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
25. It's not putting down at all |
|
Australia is like Single-A baseball in terms of media exposure. How many people in the world now Bush's face? How many people in the world blame the American President for shit that isn't his fault? Are there things that are Bush's fault? Oh hell yeah, you bet. Bush has fucked up a lot of things. But the majority of people who have gone after the President blame him for things that come from mental problems. Read a history of the people who have and who have tried to assassinate the President and you might start to understand.
I don't think governors, senators, etc. need bodyguards. There's something about the media exposure and the history of people who have tried to assassinate the President that add up to bodyguards. Check out some history before playing the victim card.
|
AusGail
(325 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-14-06 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #25 |
27. I dont profess to being a victim |
|
and you need to take a cold shower
|
JohMunich99
(155 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-14-06 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #27 |
|
"I did not put your country down and there is no need to take pot shots at mine."
I don't know what you guys do down under, but up here that's called playing the victim when no pot shots were taken.
|
AusGail
(325 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-14-06 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
34. Would you please quote me the section where I took a pot shot |
welshTerrier2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 11:33 PM
Response to Original message |
21. thanks for posting this ... |
|
Edited on Sun Aug-13-06 11:34 PM by welshTerrier2
when i was a kid, i used to wake up every morning with a shortwave radio tuned in to Radio Australia ... this was back in the '60s ... i got fairly familiar with Australian culture and even some of your local politics ...
as an American, i found your "little story" refreshing ... sometimes we become so blinded by the way things are in our own country that a quick look beyond the borders helps us see our own world a little better ...
i'm not sure whether a former president would ever be out in public with no security in this country ... i know that Senators and Congressmen go unescorted ... the bigger issue that concerns me is that our elected officials are almost invisible in their own districts ... they might make a speech in a major city but most of them do not get out enough to mingle with the common folks ... in many ways, they've become the elite ruling class ... tough to be a real democracy like that ...
of course, at election time, if you really wanted to see them, they're always glad to have you attend one of their fundraisers ... that tells you about all you really need to know ...
now where did i put that old shortwave radio?
|
AusGail
(325 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-13-06 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
22. Thankyou for understanding what I was trying to get at. |
|
I found it refreshing in this day and age of terrorism, that someone who is important to me in Australian politics could go about his business without being bothered by admirers or adversaries.
I think some people thought that I was putting down their country while praising my own.
I'll continue to dream of Utopia.
|
RFKHumphreyObama
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-14-06 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #22 |
32. It has its downsides too |
|
If Harold Holt were subject to the same security provisions as a US President, chances are he would have never gone missing.
|
RFKHumphreyObama
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-14-06 01:08 AM
Response to Original message |
31. I'm often surprised at the lack of security here |
|
When I visit Canberra, my favorite destination is Old Parliament House. I love the fact that they enable you to walk around the building on your own without supervision and the fact that you are even able to walk into the Prime Minister’s office (which was used when Parliament used to sit in that building) and explore it for as ever long as you want to. I thoroughly enjoyed being able to walk through the rooms in which Cabinet used to sit and to explore the party and Caucus rooms and to just get soaked up in the history and the environment of what once used to be the corridors of power. I just love the fact that the powers that be are trusting enough in this security-conscious era to allow you such freedom to wonder around such an important building.
|
AusGail
(325 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-14-06 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
35. I haven't been to Old Parliament House yet |
|
During the week in March 2003 when the coalition of the killing invaded Iraq, my husband and I were in Canberra. I thought that the security system would have been beefed up a bit, but it didnt seem to be. Parliament House and the War Memorial were very lax. Maybe that comes with our "She'll be right" attitude which I kind of prefer.
Next time I go to Canberra I'll check out old Parliament House. As a matter of fact I have Parliament on TV now as I write.
|
fuzzyball
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-15-06 12:06 AM
Response to Original message |
37. Immigrating to the USA is the best thing that ever happened to me... |
|
Coming from a 3rd world country, I found a country where most people are NOT prejudiced against immigrants. Thank you USA for taking in this immigrant, giving me excellent job opportunities where my talent as a good computer systems developer was given due recognition and monetary reward. To top all that I met the wonderful American girl who became my wife and gave me the two most adorable daughters.
Long live USA!!!
|
AusGail
(325 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-15-06 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #37 |
39. I am truly happy for you |
|
Sometimes we all tend to take for granted the things that are the most important in life. Lucky for you that you chose America to migrate to. For the last 10 years we have had a very racist government. I love my country for many reasons and the Howard government is not one of them. I think both our countries could be almost perfect if you could get rid of the Bush administration and I could get rid of the Howard administration.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 11:17 AM
Response to Original message |