inthebrain
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-15-06 05:00 PM
Original message |
WTF!!!!! Two anti-abortion candidates on the ballot in PA!!!!!! |
|
I suppose this is what got the latest "Green Bashing" going on the board today.
Just a quick question; Why would anyone assume they would not take advantage of that?
We are the closest we've ever been to bringing back the back alley abortion. Not to mention that the bulk of country just happens to be Pro Choice. What the hell is wrong with the folks in PA who selected this candidate?
Of course that's going to give any challenger the numbers. Can't they get this guy off?
What a ridiculous nomination. Not to mention a strategy that's burned this party in the past.
|
JohMunich99
(155 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-15-06 05:02 PM
Response to Original message |
1. So you would rather keep Santorum in office |
|
He's certainly a moderate voice on the issue.
:eyes:
Do you live in PA?
|
inthebrain
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-15-06 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. His democrat challenger aint the moderate voice on that issue either |
|
I don't live in PA.
What the hell is this guy going to argue on this issue? What reason should those that have this issue as "their issue" have to vote for the challenger?
What a dissapointing move.
|
welshTerrier2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-15-06 05:03 PM
Response to Original message |
2. more importantly, they are both "anti-choice" |
|
remember, Casey is the elephant trainer ...
|
rockymountaindem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-15-06 05:04 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Casey does not want to overturn Roe v. Wade |
|
Santorum does. There's the difference.
|
Skinner
ADMIN
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-15-06 05:04 PM
Response to Original message |
|
if you want to support third-party candidates, please do so on someone else's website.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:26 PM
Response to Original message |