Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Another Midwest Republican Defects to the Dems

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 12:31 PM
Original message
Another Midwest Republican Defects to the Dems
Over the past several months, a number of leading Republicans around the country have defected to the Democratic Party in their election bids. Their ranks include two former Republicans now running statewide bids in Kansas this fall, Johnson County District Attorney Paul Morrison who is challenging wingnut state Attorney General Phill Kline and former Kansas Republican Party Chairman Mark Parkinson who is running as Democratic Gov. Kathleen Sebelius' running mate. Now another prominent midwest Republican is defecting her party to run as a Democrat, as the Associated Press reports.

The GOP lost its lock on the top state government offices this week when State Auditor Kate Witek jumped to the Democratic party just a few months after campaigning as Republican Tom Osborne's running mate in a failed gubernatorial bid.

"I got to the point where it seemed the Republican Party was only looking at controlling all the offices instead of looking at resolving all the problems challenging this state," Witek said in Friday's Lincoln Journal Star.



True, there seem to be at least some alterior motives behind Witek's move, most notably that she is now able to run for a third term as a Democrat whereas she would not be able to do the same as a Republican. However, the fact remains that yet another Republican in the midwest has publicly come out against the extremism and the hard-right conservatism of today's GOP -- a fact that will not be lost on Republican voters in the region. Such moves only hasten the implementation of Howard Dean's 50-state strategy, growing the base of acceptable Democratic candidates in states previously less than hospitable to the party's candidates, and improve the party's chances nationally both in the short-term and the long-term.

http://www.mydd.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nice.
I wouldn't like this in more liberal areas but your examples are from places where Democrats need all the help they can get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. she cares about people. Her comment is Right on the nail.


.......I got to the point where it seemed the Republican Party was only looking at controlling all the offices instead of looking at resolving all the problems challenging this state," Witek said in Friday's Lincoln Journal Star.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. What? A republi-CON politician who actually cares more about
solving her constituents' problems than merely holding onto power?

Oh, yeah. I forgot. She's NOT a republ-CON anymore. You really cannot be one of them if you care more about solving your constituents problems than about holding onto power. For the bad guys, all it's about - and I mean ALL it's about - is power. Getting it, stealing it, manipulating it, and holding onto it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Am I the only one who does not, really, in my heart of hearts
Edited on Sat Aug-19-06 01:16 PM by mtnester
trust these crossovers right now? I mean, if it had not been an election year, maybe, but election year crossovers, when polling indicates people will be voting for "anyone without an R next to their name" are simply too suspect for my pessimistic nature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCollar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-19-06 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I'm with you
I wouldn't trust these people an inch. They wanted to be Republicans...now they want to run as Democrats?


Leopards can't change their spots...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC