Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Let's fight 'em here, so we don't have to fight them over there!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
johnlal Donating Member (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 07:57 AM
Original message
Let's fight 'em here, so we don't have to fight them over there!
Edited on Thu Aug-24-06 08:03 AM by johnlal
The cowardly Republicans always want to fight the terrorists over there so we don't have to fight them over here. I say, let's fight them over here. It will cost less, and we have home field advantage! Just think about it. It takes a lot of gasoline and petroleum products to send troops all the way to Iraq to fight. With the high gas prices, maybe the terrorists will think twice about booking that one-way flight.


Maybe this time we can fight them in a Red State like Florida or Texas rather than New York. The Red Staters are much more vocal in their support of the war (except for the Dixie Chicks). Once they get over here, it will be easy for them to get into the country. Just walk across the Mexican Border!

An added bonus: Right now we have a shortage of military personnel. The Government is forcing soldiers and marines back into service, and is putting stop-loss measures into effect. If we fight the terrorists in Texas, we can get illegal immigrants to take the military jobs that Americans don't want to do. We can probably pay the immigrant soldiers a lot less than we pay our own people.

Also, where is Halliburton headquartered? Texas! Just think of the profits they can make by cutting down the travel costs.

So, instead of fighting the terrorists over there, lets fight them over here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. A cogent and well-thought-out argument
:applause:


(and :rofl:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 08:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. Only cowards support fearmongers
(paraphrasing a very true post I saw yesterday)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. And Only Cowards Give Away Their Rights
when others died for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magnolia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. I've always hated....
...the "fight them there so we don't have to fight them here" justification. If it's true, it's a horrible thing to do to another country. Fight OUR battle there...kill their people and destroy their country! Did they give us permission to use their country to do our dirty work?

Why didn't Israel and Lebanon just say "Let's not mess up our countries and get our people killed...let's take this war to Texas! Let's fight them there, so we don't have to fight them here."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yah! Let them spend the gas money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neoblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. Good point: have the undocumented immigrants take the jobs Americans...
don't want. Should we care if they happen to be in our military--and do pay closer to a living wage; after all, they are jobs Americans don't want (right now, anyway--which is only a sign of individual insight/wisdom/prudence). Otherwise known as having a mercenary (sort of) army--very popular back in the 17th century, and making a comeback in IRAQ, what with all the private security forces (practically speaking, corporate militias/armies). So, what's the difference...

The key point was that many Americans tolerate or justify undocumented/illegal immigration by pointing out how we need them--to fill jobs Americans (who are so proud, too good to do some kinds of work...)(actually, it's just that Americans who might take such jobs would actually receive some sympathy in their demands/need for at least minimum wage (and having to pay such exorbitant wages would anger American business)) don't want. So, accordingly, this should be an acceptable solution (only the idea of giving people who've been so used and abused could seem scary--particularly to some of the abusers; and, they would also object to anyone other than an American being paid 'American' wages--this would outrage them as much or more than any security concerns).

We should make life intolerable for Americans who hold these views--and by that, I simply mean that we should make it an enforced law that even undocumented immigrants shall receive a "living wage" (preferrably with a significant increase to the so-called "minimum wage"). Having to pay all comers a full day's wages for a full day's work--egad, I can hear it now "why... that's just un-American...". To our shame, such practices are indeed "business as usual" in "the land of the free".

When will morality, honesty and justice--all part of "the American way", make a comeback (especially in Congress and all of our political leadership)? Perhaps if we, the people, didn't tolerate being lied to and swindled... but making our leaders clean up their collective act might take more effort/action than just occasionally casting a vote and complaining, so it's probably not especially likely. All the less likely so long as people are falling for the notion that we are too busy fighting them (terra-ists) over there, so we don't have to... blah, blah, blah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. Now, that's what I call
a STRATEGERY ! Home Team Advantage ! Bring 'Em Home & then Bring It On ! Brilliant, john ! SG

:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
8. I've always thought it was one of the most
arrogant and selfish things that the Repugs have ever uttered. In actuality what they have said and are still saying is "Lets go destroy another country and kill tens of thousands of their people fighting terrorist so we dont have to destroy our infrastructure and possibility kill any of our "important" citizens. And NO, I didnt just say american people because they sure dont care about sacrificing american lives....they do it almost every day and it hasnt bothered the repugs bastards one bit. All they care about are the "important" american lives...read "theirs".
And another thing.....What kind of twisted mind says Lets fight them over there so we dont have to fight them over here........americans are dying either way.....over 2600 of them so far. So, what is the fucking difference....americans are STILL dying you fuckheads. Its not about terrorism. Its about OIL and CONTRACTS. PERIOD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigma000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
9. Think how much simpler it would have been to fight WWII
All that slogging through the invasions of France and Italy, grinding through the western front, huge navel battles. What if we had the war here? Those Soviets were so lucky: they could fight during the day and go home to the family at night. It was a 9 to 5 job for them.

Wars are so much more pleasant when you live in the country that the fighting takes place in. Ask any European.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-24-06 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. Why a Red state like Texas or Florida?
Your profile claims you are in Kentucky which is also a red state. Why not fight them there? If you are really serious about fighting them here instead of there then you surely don't have any objections to letting the battle begin in your hometown of Louisville. Or do you?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnlal Donating Member (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Really Serious?
"If you are really serious about fighting them here instead of there then you surely don't have any objections to letting the battle begin in your hometown of Louisville."

I wasn't really serious. It was my attempt at humor. I chose Texas and Florida because of their connection with the Bush Boys.

Kentucky would be a fine place to battle the Terrorists. However, my hometown of Louisville would not be the optimal place for the battle. (Too close to the gold in Fort Knox). I think Lexington would be a better place. (joking again)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
12. 2-cents
various reports have pointed out there are more terrorist attacks today than prior to September 11, or even the invasion of Iraq.

for the terrorists, the war on terror is a great success. the more we "fight over there" the more people join the terroristic groups "over there"

meanwhile, as airline passengers dump their shampoo, hand lotion and a sundry of other items into bins before boarding an airplane - our ports and other entry points are wide open OVER HERE.

yeah there's a cartoon in this - bush is holding/locking a front door shut to prevent terrorists from "fighting over here", meanwhile they are sneaking in through a back door.

and not to stir up a fight/debate on immigration - but think about it, if umpteen million illegal aliens have entered and are entering our country today - what's to stop a few terrorists from doing the same. If they can "McGuyver" a "liquid bomb" from shampoo and pencil shavings on a plane, they can do it anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-25-06 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
13. That justification for going to Iraq is grotesque when you think about it
Edited on Fri Aug-25-06 08:54 AM by Evergreen Emerald
One of the justifications for going to Iraq is to fight them over there rather than over here. Think about that concept: we would have invaded a country, destroyed their infrastructure, and used innocent Iraqi men, women, and children as human shields purposefully putting them between us and the terrorists.

I grew up believing that Americans were brave and strong and just. The idea that we would purposefully hide behind Iraqi citizens as we bombed and shot and killed is against everything for which America has historically stood. It is cowardice and evil and ugly.

How can they get away with that justification for going to Iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lilith Velkor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. They can't.
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC