Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rolling Stone.com: Firing Squad Looms For The Dem Party Oligarchy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 07:03 AM
Original message
Rolling Stone.com: Firing Squad Looms For The Dem Party Oligarchy
http://www.alternet.org/columnists/story/40744/

Establishment Dems treat their political party like a house in the fucking Hamptons. Who died and made these people gatekeepers to anything?

Firing Squad Looms for the Dem Party Oligarchy
By Matt Taibbi, RollingStone.com

Posted on August 23, 2006, Printed on August 26, 2006
http://www.alternet.org/story/40744/

- snip -

What exactly does self-appointed congressional mega-celebrity and Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee chair Rahm Emmanuel mean (says a friend of mine in congress of him: "He's an amoral, showboating cock") when he says, "Do I think and Al Sharpton are the future of the Democratic Party?"

That's actually not hard to figure out; it's political hack-ese for the human sentence bloggers = Al Sharpton. As for what he means by that: just think about the thought process that had to go into Emmanuel's adding of the phrase "and Al Sharpton," when Al Sharpton wasn't even part of the question. Ask yourself if you really believe Emmanuel isn't aware that he's addressing the mostly white, Upper West Side readers of New York magazine when he "offhandedly" ties bloggers to the legendary gold medallion-wearing icon from forty blocks north in Harlem.

- snip -

Finally, the "firing squad in a circle" line has been a DLC favorite for years. DLC chief Al From has been pimping it at least since the last presidential race. It's time we officially retired this line, which is really just a sorry take on the lame old high-school guidance-counselor saw: "Now, Jimmy. When you shoot spitballs at Vice Principal Anderson, you're really shooting spitballs at yourself." And little Jimmy thinks: No, actually, I was shooting spitballs at Vice Principal Anderson...

What's amazing about the "firing squad in a circle" line is that it is inevitably used less than five seconds after the DLC speaker has just finished dumping on Michael Moore, peace activists, or whoever the party's talking-points-vermin of the day is (In this case, Sharpton and bloggers). He denounces Michael Moore as a disgrace to the party, then turns around and says that when we attack the party leadership, we're only hurting ourselves. These tactics are so transparent and condescending that one longs for some kind of cosmic referee to just drop down from the heavens and unilaterally disqualify their users on the grounds of their overwhelming general wrongness -- but the maddening thing about these DLC creatures is that that referee never arrives, and Al From is back on page one again the next day, shaking his head and grumbling piously about "unity" and "consensus" and "the lost art of bipartisanship."

- snip -

This schism within the Democratic Party is the most interesting thing to happen in American politics in decades, because due to a system error, people have temporarily been allowed back into what had been a totally closed process. They're working round the clock to fix the loophole, though, because the Emmanuels of the world know what's coming if they don't. The firing squad. And this time it won't be in a circle.

Matt Taibbi is a writer for Rolling Stone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lostnotforgotten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Damn Straight - Dump The DLC!
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duke Newcombe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Before we recruit the firing squad...
Edited on Sat Aug-26-06 10:40 PM by Duke Newcombe
...I'd hope we remember that WE'RE the "big tent" party, where failure to think as a monolith is NOT a crime. Isn't that a function of the Republican party?

We got elections to win, folks...I'm just sayin'

Duke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. Great Piece, simply excellent.
Matt Taibbi is the primary reason I subscribe to the Stone. Well OK, I get because of Salon. But I renewed. I get all my magazines because of Salon, my gain is actually the local VA's gain, they now have a steady stream of liberal rags :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost Dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. "bloggers" and Al Sharpton.. k&r
Edited on Sat Aug-26-06 08:00 AM by Ghost Dog
Rolling Stone getting its rocks off recently, I see.

Ed. Stone link here: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/11275627/the_low_post_democrats_walk_themselves_to_the_gallows
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. The DLC has GOT to go!
Lock, stock, and barrel! -- Gone.. as in finito, adios, buh-bye.... G O N E!

Power to the PEOPLE!

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. Fuck the DLC
What have they ever done for the average working American?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
Edited on Sat Aug-26-06 10:12 AM by wryter2000
And bookmarked. I've never heard it put better. :bounce:

How is it that these people have avoided being pitchforked to death for this long?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
7. If you fail often enough, you get fired. Retire Rahm, Al From, and theDLC
How many elections do these guys have to lose before they're told by the Party to stop by HR and clear out their desks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
8. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
9. So, does this mean that The Rolling Stone is now
a "progressive purist?" ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Doubtful
I don't trust them, not after years of their Dem bashing via misogynist Faux Dem writers like PJ O'Rourke and Christopher Hitchens.

Rolling Stone bashed Dems all through the Clinton years and played cheerleader for Bush I. They've now been exposed as the complete idiots they are. I don't trust them to abandon principle again for the latest political fad or to boost ad revenue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
11. late-night kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC