Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I don't understand Kerry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Mile Hi Donating Member (106 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 10:35 AM
Original message
I don't understand Kerry
Put aside his votes to back Bush on the IWR or the Patriot Act.

This one really confuses me.

Kerry is asking for the resignation of Tenet.

Bushco and the GOP along with some Dems has been saying there was an intelligence breakdown on the WMD's.
The media has been saying there was an intelligence breakdown on the WMD's.

Bush is appointing a commission to find out what the intelligence breakdown was.

But there wasn't an intelligence breakdown. Tenet tried to stop the Niger claim. In fact many of the reports from the CIA, Air force, FBI etc made it clear that Saddam wasn't a threat.
http://www.americanprogress.org/site/pp.asp?c=biJRJ8OVF&b=24889
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0205-09.htm

Why is Kerry calling for Tenet to resign which helps Bush and deflects blame onto the intelligence instead of putting the blame on Bush and Cheney that clearly misrepresented the intelligence?

Dean has come out and claimed Cheney manipulated the intellegence which there is some evidence to back it up. Why is Kerry not doing the same. Yes Kerry has attacked Bush on the "process" of going to war and said he "f---ed up".

It just seem kind of strange that Kerry is calling for Tenet when the CIA is not the one at fault.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm not sure, Mike
Someone here speculted that if Tenet resigns he might turn on Bush, and that could be Kerry's strategy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seventhson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. Like BCCI and Iran-Cocaine-CIA-Contra, Kerry is once again
playing into the coverup for the King IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 10:41 AM
Original message
Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
RichM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
21. Exactly. It's Kerry's signal to the big boys that he'll play ball w. them-
that they have nothing to fear from him. He is signalling that he'll help maintain this ridiculous pretense of "flawed intelligence" being responsible for the Iraq mess, rather than outright US Government crimes (in which he himself is complicit).

This disgusting behavior, BTW, is exactly why Kerry is the "front runner," happily gathering support from the media and the Democratic Establishment. They all like that he's well-behaved, totally house-broken, & guaranteed not to make any waves for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. Kerry has already called for "REGIME CHANGE IN WASHINGTON"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuminousX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. He's running for President, of course he is calling for a regime change
That isn't a big deal. How far along is he in pushing Censure of Bush for Bush's lies to Congress and for violating the word of the IWR?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monte Carlo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. If Tenet were to resign, it might reflect badly on Bush.
It would be admitting fault, which is something that the Bush Administration never does. Once there is blood in the water, other Democrats, the media, the pundits, etc. could become frenzied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. Because Bush and Tenet are covering up for each other
That is obvious.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. BINGO. Separate them and see what happens.
The truth has a way of coming out AFTER someone leaves the Bush administration, doesn't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. Well, he can't exactly point to his own complicity
now, can he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. You guys kill me. No shit n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. no...your guy is responsible for needless death & suffering. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. There's a great idea. Blame Kerry so W doesn't have to honestly implement
IWR. It is SO much easier on the brain that way and serves the narrow political interests of the Dean campaign.

Brilliant strategy. Now let's go blow 41 million dollars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlavesandBulldozers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
7. because
Kerry can't go the Dean route AND stay in the media's good graces. See, because the Dean route is a one-way street to media assassination. Kerry would become the "angry candidate" that claims Bush had ulterior motives for the whole damn thing.

Kerry's a Democrat, sure, but he's a politician first off and foremost. Hence, in his mind - it's perfectly normal to vote for IWR and then criticize the execution of the war. Kerry can't afford to be mired down by such things as hypocricy - because where would he start?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
9. Because Tenet is covering up for Bush, and needs pressure applied to him
to get him talking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
isbister Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
10. Why is Kerry calling for Tenet to resign
If it were me...

I see Tenet as a scapegoat now or later. There are a lot of investigations going on where Tenet is involved... a few involving Iraq/WMD alone. If Tenet steps down now, who's bush got left to blame next month, the month after, the month after... Sure, he can point to Tenet once Tenet's out of office but how will that play time and time again... not very well I imagine, it is already beginning to be pointed out that the buck stops at the president's desk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
13. Statement from John Kerry on CIA Director George Tenet’s Speech
Edited on Fri Feb-06-04 10:49 AM by bigtree
Statement from John Kerry on CIA Director George Tenet’s Speech at Georgetown University

February 05, 2004

“Today, the CIA Director, George Tenet, admitted that the intelligence agencies never told the White House that Iraq posed an imminent threat. But that’s not what the Bush White House told the American people. They said Iraq posed a ‘mortal threat,’ an ‘urgent threat,’ an ‘immediate threat,’ a ‘serious threat,’ and, yes, an ‘imminent threat’ to the people of the United States.

“Today, we found out that George Bush, Dick Cheney, Don Rumsfeld, and the rest of the Administration weren’t passing on sound facts on Iraq to the American people - they were playing politics with our national security.

“Americans should be able to trust that what the President tells them is true - especially when it comes to the life and death decisions of war and peace.

“We need to restore America’s credibility around the world and the trust of the American people in their government at home. That’s not going to happen with a sham commission hand-picked by George Bush to look into how these faulty facts on Iraq made it to the American people. It’s not going to happen while the Bush White House continues its stalling and stonewalling. What we need is for this President to take responsibility - to face the truth - and to finally tell the truth to the American people. And we need that now.”
http://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/releases/pr_2004_0205f.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Kerry Statement on the allegation that CIA Director Admitted WH Pressure
Edited on Fri Feb-06-04 11:10 AM by bigtree

Kerry Statement on the allegation that CIA Director Admitted White House Pressure on Intelligence Info
http://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/releases/pr_2003_0717.html
July 17, 2003

Democratic Presidential candidate John Kerry today responded to allegations announced this morning by US Senator Richard Durbin that CIA Director George Tenet admitted that an unnamed White House official pressured the CIA to allow unverified nuclear claims to be included in the State of the Union.

John Kerry said, “It’s deeply troubling, but not altogether surprising, to learn that there may have been direct political pressure exerted on the CIA to exaggerate nuclear claims in the President’s state of the union address. This is just more evidence that, as I said yesterday, President Bush must support a full and independent investigation so that the American people know the full truth about what happened.”

The Associated Press reported this morning: “CIA Director George Tenet told members of Congress a White House official insisted that President Bush's State of the Union address include an assertion about Saddam Hussein's nuclear intentions that had not been verified, a Senate Intelligence Committee member said Thursday. Sen. Dick Durbin, who was present for a 4.5-hour appearance by Tenet behind closed doors with Intelligence Committee members Wednesday, said Tenet named the official. But the Illinois Democrat said that person's identity could not be revealed because of the confidentiality of the proceedings.”


Why didn't Tenent resign then? He admitted that the CIA had helped include the phony info in the SOTU. Why wasn't anyone fired?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
14. It's a chess strategy.
Edited on Fri Feb-06-04 10:52 AM by displacedtexan
Instead of basing each move on the immediate look of the board, good chess players visualize 10 or 12 moves beyond the one at hand. They think, "if I move this pawn, what are my opponent's logical responses?"

Someone is lying about pre-war intel ("We were all wrong" won't fly, with over 500 dead).

By calling on * to fire Tenet, Kerry and Kennedy are challenging * either to blame the intel community or accept responsibility, himself.

This is how politics works: you have to convince "regular" Americans that they are smart enough to figure out (even if it takes years) that which you understood the moment it happened.

Just my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KC21304 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. And my opinion. If Tenet is not able to
admit that Bush and company fiddled with the intelligence than he needs a little push.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
isbister Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
19. Why is Kerry not doing the same.
He's walking a fine line right now... he's already been tagged as arrogant, they might be holding back some out of the fear of appearing as if they assume the nomination is all sewn up.

It could also be that it is too early in the race to shoot off all of their ammo in the fight against bush.

Dr. Dean is a private citizen and Kerry is a member of the Senate. This could be a factor in how far Kerry goes at this time, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
20.  I think Dean was first to call for it . Followed by Lieberman
Kerry Says Bush Lacks Viable Security Plan
July 17, 2003
New York Times

"Let me state it plainly," said Mr. Kerry, a Democratic presidential contender. "Just as we did not have a viable plan for Iraq after the capture of Baghdad, today we still do not have a real plan and enough resources for preparedness against a terrorist attack."

It was among the sterner rebukes of Mr. Bush so far by a Democratic candidate on the topic of national security, and it came in a week in which nearly all the Democratic prospects have been attacking the president on the issue. Senator Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut called today for the resignation of George J. Tenet, the director of central intelligence, following in the footsteps of Howard Dean, the former governor of Vermont, who made a similar demand on Sunday.

Mr. Kerry leveled fresh accusations that the administration had not been forthcoming in its policies about Iraq, particularly in its efforts to promote the war. "It is clear that a dangerous gap in credibility has developed between President Bush's tough rhetoric and timid policies which don't do nearly enough to protect Americans from danger," he said. Mr. Kerry said the president had purposefully stalled the investigation into the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and suggested, ungently, that he "get out of the way."

"It's time we were told the truth about America's safety," he said. "It's time we had a president who will truly make this nation more secure."

http://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/clips/news_2003_0717a.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC