Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hemp: "Voters guide"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 11:11 AM
Original message
Hemp: "Voters guide"
http://www.VoteHemp.com

WASHINGTON, Feb. 2 /U.S. Newswire/ --

Vote Hemp released today ratings of the leading presidential candidates to help voters nationwide learn more about their views on non-psychoactive industrial hemp. The results of the survey are available at http://www.VoteHemp.com.

Candidates were given a letter grade reflecting their views and willingness to participate in the "2004 Vote Hemp Candidate Survey," which asked the candidates if they support: hemp farming and processing in the U.S. under a straightforward regulatory regime similar to those in the EU, Canada and other countries; states' rights to study hemp farming and processing without federal interference; hemp fiber products for construction, automotive, paper, textile and other industries; and hemp food products in the face of the Bush Administration's attempt to ban them. The survey results are crucial for an increa sing number of U.S. farmers, environmentalists and entrepreneurs who are seeking reform in laws affecting the cultivation and processing of industrial hemp and hemp products in the United States.

"After spending three months trying to get these candidates to respond to our survey, it is clear that most of them have not researched this issue and choose to remain ignorant on the benefits of industrial hemp." says Eric Steenstra, president of Vote Hemp, the leading organization dedicated to the recommercialization of hemp agriculture and industry in the United States. "Only

Democrat Dennis Kucinich, Green Party Candidate David Cobb and Libertarian Gary Nolan received 'A' grades," says Steenstra.

Rep. Dennis Kucinich replied to the survey just two weeks after receiving it. He expressed full support for keeping hemp food products legal, despite the Drug Enforcement Administration's attempt to ban edible hemp. He also supports allowing farmers to grow hemp and would loosen restrictions on industrial hemp research. He is by far the strongest supporter of hemp among Democrats.

Sen. John Edwards was at first reluctant to answer the survey, but after getting a direct question in New Hampshire from Vote Hemp National Coordinator Tom Murphy, Edwards personally promised to answer the survey. Edwards got a "B-" rating for keeping his promise and supporting states' rights to research industrial hemp without federal interference. However, he remained "undecided" on the legality of hemp food and hemp cultivation. As an interesting side note, Edwards grew up in Robbins, N.C., a town that from 1904 to 1943 was named "Hemp" due to hemp agriculture's prominence as one of America's most important crops before the "Reefer Madness" hysteria of last century.

Gov. Howard Dean received a "C-" grade based on his past neutral position on pro-industrial hemp legislation that became law in Vermont without his signature in 1996. Dean's failure to respond to the Vote Hemp survey despite publicly stating that he would give his position on any issue, and his clear neglect of his staff's recommendations to reply, resulted in his below average rating.

Both the Rev. Al Sharpton and Sen. Joe Lieberman received "D-" grades for failing to respond to the survey after numerous attempts to contact them.

Sen. John Kerry and Gen. Wesley Clark received "F" grades for publicly promising they would answer our survey and, even after extending deadlines to accommodate them, breaking their word by failing to respond. Unfortunately both Kerry and Clark chose to play politics instead of honoring their public promises.

President George W. Bush received an "F" grade for overseeing the DEA's assault on industrial hemp over the past few years. His campaign responded to the survey by saying they were not established yet and later refused to respond.

Hundreds of U.S. businesses, mainly small or family operations, manufacture for resale or own stores that sell a wide variety of products made from industrial hemp. Products made with hemp fiber and seed are sold in thousands of retail stores across the country, including chain stores like Wal-Mart, Staples, Whole Foods Market and The Body Shop. Hemp fiber composites are in over two million U.S. cars made by Ford, DaimlerChrysler and other auto-makers. Unfortunately, American companies must import hemp fiber and seed from Canada, Europe and Asia. This is despite the fact that hemp grows well in all 50 states and the U.S. has a long and rich history of hemp farming dating back to Colonial times when George Washington and Thomas Jefferson grew hemp on their farms and widely promoted the use of hemp. A recent Zogby poll of 1,000 likely U.S. voters showed that 66 percent support allowing U.S. farmers to grow industrial hemp.

http://www.usnewswire.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. John Kerry gets an "A" for toking Puff the Magic Dragon in Iowa
But seriously he said he believed in a "hands off" attitude (non enforcement) towards actual users (not dealers).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. KERRY Gets A+ for Not Being So Dumb to Answer Such Surveys
The Repubs are already mass circulating a video showing Kerry pretending to have a draw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. This is about industrial hemp!
Good gods! If your candidate doesn't have the balls to answer a simple question, why is he running for office? If he thinks allowing Americans to profit from growing an industrial crop that is used world-wide and has been for centuries - more, even, than cotton - then he should say so. If he is in favor, he should say so. What frightens him so badly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corporatewhore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Not to mention the "environmentalist" should be thinking of the trees
Hemp can produce more paper per acre than trees can and once you harvest the crop you can always grow a new batch lickety split as jello biafra says we are literally wiping our ass with the future of this planet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corporatewhore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. As usual Kucinich at the top of the class!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. Kucinich A, Edwards B-....... everyone else C-, D- and F.
Thought I'd put that in a headline so people wouldn't have to read through the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loftycity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm in Sales for Canadian Hemp
That's what I do. I sell for the Canadian Hemp Corporation and others in Canada.
It is starting to Sell in the USA. Hemp flour, oil, nuts and other products made with core ingredients.
All Hemp products are tested for the THC and do not even hit any level to think twice about.
I do hope the candidates take a closer look at this and don't believe in the government propaganda. If anyone should know about these issues--They should.
I would recommend "Drug Crazy" by Mike Gray. Best book out there on the subject.
Cheers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheezus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. Non psychoactive? Awwww shucks ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC