Some unfairness in Maryland Senate race?

[savemefromdumbya]

Here is a press release from Dr Alan Lichtman, a liberal. It seems they are only worried about the frontrunners in Maryland? Not fair? Why aren't they giving the other candidates like Alan a chance instead of throwing him into jail?

Dear Friends,

"We present our very bodies as a means of laying our case before the conscience of the local and the national community." Martin Luther King, Letter From a Birmingham Jail

I am a Democratic candidate for U. S. Senate in Maryland and a University professor, teaching for 33 years. Yet I write to you from a Baltimore County jail. I write from memory because the jailer allows no paper, no pen or pencil in his cell.

I am in jail because I put my body on the line to uphold the right of the people to choose their United States Senator from Maryland, not have their Senator chosen for them by media chieftains or organization heads. I am in jail because I protested the arbitrary and restrictive decisions made by the Maryland League of Women Voters (MLWV), Maryland Public Television (MPT), and public radio station WAMU to exclude from the most important televised debate of the campaign, significant candidates with fresh ideas for the voters to hear and weigh: myself, Josh Rales, and Dennis Rasmussen.

It is ironic that MPT, supported by taxpayer dollars, with a mission educate and inform the public, should have adopted a standard for debating (15 percent in the polls by July 1 - two days prior to the filing deadline) so restrictive that it excludes all but the two old-line politicians running for U. S. Senate in Maryland. It is beyond irony that the League of Women Voters, founded by suffragists dedicated to opening politics to the excluded, should now be shutting down the political process in Maryland.

The standard adopted by the League and MPT is not only contrary to their past practice, but would have excluded from the 1994 gubernatorial debates in Maryland, Ellen Sauerbrey, who went on to upset the frontrunner and win the Republican nomination, becoming the first woman nominated for governor by a major party in Maryland. It would have from participation in primary debates every woman who ever sought a major party nomination for president. In vain, I tried to reverse this decision by filing petitions with the MLWV, the National League of Women Voters, and the FCC.

I took my protest directly the Maryland Public Television on the evening of August 31, asking only that myself, Rales, and Rasmussen to be heard in the debate.

I did not have to be arrested because I was not interfering with any activities at MPT. I was not even in the lobby of the building. I was standing in a tiny outer foyer in front of locked doors to the lobby asking for democracy to work and for voters to decide the senatorial election. MPT could have let me stand there and talk and held their debate. Instead, they decided to call in the police and have been forcibly removed and arrested on the extraordinary charge of "trespassing on public property after hours." Is it hardly "after hours" when public television is airing a public event.

I continued my peaceful protest, together with my wife Karyn Strickler - a political leader in Maryland - because we could not look my 14 son in the eye unless we were willing to put our safety and comfort on the line for the principle.

My background and my ideas are different from the two candidates privileged to debate. If allowed to debate I would have presented voters the choice of electing the Senate's only lifetime teacher and a civil rights expert in 70 cases. I would have explained that unlike the so-called frontunners, as Senator, I would vote only for funds to bring our brave troops home safely and promptly from Iraq. I would have proposed legislation for reducing fossil fuel consumption by 50 percent over 20 years and for securing our voting rights.

Getting arrested is painful and humiliating. I still have welts on my wrist from the bite of the steel handcuffs and a pain in my back from where I was pushed into the police car. They strip away everything you have at the jailhouse, including your belt and your shoelaces, and they clamp leg irons on your feet that dig into your tendons. That's the response of MPT to a candidate exercising free speech rights - clamp him in irons!

They can try to silence my voice, but I continue speaking out for the people of Maryland and America. The issues raised in my protest go far beyond a Senate race in Maryland, but cut to the heart of what it means to live in a free and democratic society. The times are no less urgent today than during the great civil rights struggles of the 1960s. The cause is no less great. At stake in Maryland's senatorial election are war and peace, the survival of our planet, the preservation of our cherished liberties, and the opportunities for our children to have an excellent education and good jobs.

Together, let us take personal responsibility for creating a better Maryland and a better America. Let the voices of the people be heard!

Sincerely,

Allan Lichtman
Democrat for U.S. Senate

[n2doc]

1. Pic of the arrest

U.S. Senate candidate Allen Lichtman, left, reacts as he and his wife Karyn Strickler, on ground, are arrested at the doors of the Maryland Public Television building in Owings Mills, Md. Lichtman was arrested for trying to gain access to the building and participate in a debate that was being sponsored by the League of Women Voters between candidates Kweisi Mfume and Ben Cardin. Lichtman and other candidates were not included in the debate. (AP Photo/Matthew Houston)
(August 31, 2006)

Never forget- the Senate is an exclusive Club!:sarcasm:

[Orangepeel]

2. There seem to be 18 active Democratic candidates

According to the Maryland elections site, there are 18 active Democratic candidates for the Senate seat. Should the League of Women Voters have had a debate with all of them? What useful information would the voters get if 18 people were trying to debate at once (even assuming that none of them are nutbars)?

The League is an independent organization that is trying to provide a service to voters. Accordingly, they set a standard of who to let in based on who they thought, based on poll numbers, actually had a chance.

It is certainly easy to disagree with the standard they set and reasonable people could certainly think that 15% was unfair. But... their debate, their rules. :shrug:



http://www.elections.state.md.us/current_election/candidates/All_Offices.html#office_007

Candidate: Benjamin L. Cardin
Party: Democratic
Status: Active

Candidate: David Dickerson
Party: Democratic
Status: Active

Candidate: George T. English
Party: Democratic
Status: Active

Candidate: James H. Hutchinson
Party: Democratic
Status: Active

Candidate: Anthony Jaworski
Party: Democratic
Status: Active

Candidate: A. Robert Kaufman
Party: Democratic
Status: Active

Candidate: Allan Lichtman
Party: Democratic
Status: Active

Candidate: Thomas McCaskill
Party: Democratic
Status: Active

Candidate: Kweisi Mfume
Party: Democratic
Status: Active

Candidate: Josh Rales
Party: Democratic
Status: Active

Candidate: Dennis F. Rasmussen
Party: Democratic
Status: Active

Candidate: Bob Robinson
Party: Democratic
Status: Active

Candidate: Theresa C. Scaldaferri
Party: Democratic
Status: Active

Candidate: Mike Schaefer
Party: Democratic
Status: Active

Candidate: Charles Ulysses Smith
Party: Democratic
Status: Active

Candidate: Blaine Taylor
Party: Democratic
Status: Active

Candidate: Joseph Werner
Party: Democratic
Status: Active

Candidate: Lih Young
Party: Democratic
Status: Active

[savemefromdumbya]

5. 10 for the Presidential debate why not 18?

I hate it when they leave the minorities out

[Ignacio Upton]

7. Mfume is black

And he's raised less money than Rales, but is leading Cardin in the primary polls, he was allowed to debate. This is different from, say, NY1's refusal to let Tasini debate Hillary based on the fact that he had little money.

[savemefromdumbya]

4. Thanks for the pic!

looks like Alan and Karyn are making a scene

[SPCAworks]

8. hmmmm....

a little bit "dramatic" don't you think? How would they have 18 people involved in a debate?? Practically, how?

[Stinky The Clown]

3. I talked about this the other day

This thread about it The State of the Debates went nowhere.

[savemefromdumbya]

6. sorry I must have missed this - thanks!