Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

JOE BAGEANT: American Liberalism Needs More Roy Orbison,Less Wonk Strategy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Tace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 04:22 PM
Original message
JOE BAGEANT: American Liberalism Needs More Roy Orbison,Less Wonk Strategy
Can American liberalism rise from Washington’s two-bed brothel to dance with the ghost of Roy Orbison and eat garden tomatoes?

By Joe Bageant -- World News Trust

snip

Like all great fiction, it provides moments of comic relief, typically through irony. Thus, we watch the development of liberal political “strategy.” One has to laugh. Laugh first at the notion that the Hamptons Country Club leadership now designing “national strategy” could ever make working people getting poorer by the day ever believe in them for Christ sake. The people sitting around the Shenandoah this morning will never believe that a gaggle of cagey, sophisticated multi-millionaire party leaders being limoed from the Ritz Carlton to their appearance on Jon Stewart are somehow going to look out for the blood-smeared guys and gals down at the chicken plant. Or the blood-smeared guys in Iraq for that matter. It’s too late for that. They cannot raise the already dead. They are complicit in the same power poker game as the Republicans and they will remain that way, as my neighbor puts it: “Until the dumb motherfucking voters can see beyond the price of a gallon of gas.” Or the office basketball pool or the next staged election year non-issue. The real issues are always moral, usually involving purposeful neglect of some portion of society, which is supposed to be the Democratic arena.

Yet every honest candidate who dares mention such issues is deemed “too far left to be workable.” Then they are squashed like Ralph Nader or Dennis Kucinich, or the notion of kicking the insurance companies entirely out of our health care system and declaring universal health care as a citizen right like most civilized nations have done. And then, after having killed everyone around them but members of their country club, the national leadership comes back to us talking about “renewal.” And offers us brilliant ideas such as pulling out of Iraq three years and thousands of corpses too late.

Even being aware of the process is not much help. What we can do personally that would make the slightest difference? So we continue to let a political managerial expert class advise and run the only game in town, and contribute time and money to the very people who engineered liberal failure for the past 30 years. Academic “framers,” wonks and just plain bullshit artists hawking out-of touch candidates -- though there small signs of hope as we enjoy watching Joe the ho’ Lieberman finally strangle in his own stench. Nowhere was it more savored than amid the drooling political junkies of the blogosphere, that cyber-fiction of freedom where unhappy minions of the Empire rant about “strategies” instead of taking to the streets where the voters and potential voters are, particularly those very voters who damned well need what the Democrats once offered. Time was, when Democrats used to put money in the budget for older Americans and others for social programs -- at least enough for some goddamned bingo games and an occasional dance for the widowed and the lonely. Maybe we need to kidnap the leadership and force them to listen to Roy’s songs for twenty-four hours straight.

Then too, how can well meaning Democratic voters do anything, even if they were inclined to action? They are trapped in their cubicles doing the Empire’s most mundane tasks. So they settle for blogger world. (Ever notice how all the forums go completely dead at 5 p.m.) None of which currently matters because neither the bloggers nor the candidates are going to shake the dirty hands they most need to become politically relevant again. First they would have to convince some very fucked over people in this country who gave up long ago on politicians that they are sincere.

To even begin doing that they will need to be in neighborhoods like this one year round, year after year, and be there even when there is NOT an election coming up. Fuck the last-minute “canvassing” and the highly paid liberal influencers’ advice. Personally go help somebody Like Pauline or one of her grandkids. Then the people will understand. That is reality-based politics. The kind that puts real people together face to face with feet planted in the same dirt.

more

http://www.worldnewstrust.com/content/view/64/331/lang,en/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fabulous Read
Thanks

*shadow government*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. YESSSS!
It's not about strategies, it's about SUBSTANCE.

Fifty percent of the people don't even vote. Nobody has given them a reason to, because from their vantage point, nothing changes, whether there's a D or an R in office. (Don't natter at me about Clinton's economy. It was great for the middle class, but the working class continued to get shafted as usual.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Joe Hits The Nail On The Head
He's among the most talented writers I've ever worked with. It's like working with Hemmingway, or someone like that. I'm not exaggerating his talent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wiley50 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks for upstaging my thead on same topic
Edited on Sat Sep-02-06 05:33 PM by Wiley50
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-02-06 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Sorry Wiley50
I didn't know you'd posted it. Too late for me to subtract.

So nice, it was posted twice.

In any case, everyone should read Joe Bageant -- from any reliable source!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-04-06 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. Replied to this the first time, and it was roundly ignored, so here it
goes again.

This is THE MOST IMPORTANT issue for the Democratic Party to deal with, bar none. So of course, let's all just squeeze our eyes shut, stick our fingers in our ears, and sing "La la la la la" really loud, so we can continue to pretend that eventually, somehow, some way, people will become so desperate that they will vote for us. Well, things are pretty dismal right now, so maybe we will win this November.

And then what? Will they institute the fundamental changes that are necessary to fixing the, mostly unrealized, disaster that we are heading toward? Are we advocating the elimination of legalized bribery that has taken over DC in the guise of "campaign reform"?

It is absolutely maddening that, even here, we just can't break through the distraction du jour, long enough to get this out front. My head is so sore... :banghead:

And to Wiley50; take heart, I'm sure it was an oversight. :toast: :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-05-06 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
7. Good morning kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. Nobody really cares about this? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteppingRazor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. As usual, Joe Bageant is pretty spot on...
he's one of the best liberal writers on the Net, as far as I'm concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC