Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The "Single State" Strategy For Opposing Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Parisle Donating Member (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 10:04 AM
Original message
The "Single State" Strategy For Opposing Bush
---- During the past year, I worked fairly closely with some activist-minded folks in Vermont to write something which came to be called the "prior dissent" resolution. "Prior dissent" referred to the act by a single state government of declaring in advance that, should a president issue any Executive Decree (such as martial law declarations, election suspensions and specific curtailments of Bill Of Rights guarantees) which the state felt was excessive or dangerous, then that state reserved the right not to recognize that decree within its own state boundaries. The idea is not new; Jefferson's "nullification" resolution covered some of the same ground.

---- I began writing a modern version of this strategy in the hope that, if a state were to adopt it before Bush attempted any acts of outright usurpation,.. and if there was fairly widespread notice and discussion of the resolution,.. then it might possibly become something of "speed-bump" blocking his path. The "element of surprise" would have been removed, if you will. And I selected Vermont as the state to approach with the draft, particularly those Vermonters connected to the small, but active Secession Movement there,... also known as the Second Vermont Republic, founded by Dr. Thomas Naylor. Naturally, the hope existed that similar resolutions could be adopted by other states, as well.

---- Secession for Vermont was not my concern, but I figured that folks thinking secession would be highly receptive to the notion of prior dissent, and that proved to be true. Prior dissent came to be regarded as a forerunner, or "trigger," to any subsequent secession activity. Discussion, correspondence and re-drafting went on for months. I wrote an article or two for local publications, and was a guest a few times on a Vermont radio talk show,... once even appearing with noted author Mark Crispin Miller. And in fact, the resolution actually DID make it to the Vermont legislature, where it failed to pass,.. possibly due to the fact that the folks I was dealing with could not bear to part with the idea of eventual secession,.. and they added that language to the final draft sent to the legislature. I felt this was a mistake.

---- The original draft of the Prior Dissent Resolution may be found at the official website of the Second Vermont Republic (you'll have to do a search,.. I can't post a link).... It's under "Writings and Essays" or something like that,... you'll know it when you see it. But I invite DU'ers to take a look and judge for yourselves if such an initiative at the state level could be of use in deterring this fascist regime as it tries to maintain its original gameplan through its final two years. Thanks, and I hope you like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Parisle Donating Member (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Okay,... Here's a little more help...
---- The Second Vermont Republic website is at www.vermontrepublic.org ,........ and the prior dissent resolution is listed under Issues and Essays,.. "Other Articles,"...... and is called the State Sovereignty Resolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC