BOSSHOG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-11-06 01:37 PM
Original message |
U.S. would be safer if Hussein still in power |
|
I've thought this all along but finally a United States Senator has so stated. Senator Rockefeller of W. Virginia stated on TV over the weekend (I have no link.) Hussein could not attack the U. S. despite the lies from the republican/"conservative" hate and lie machine and the lemmings at free republic who swallow better then a veteran whore on bourbon street. Kneel down, suck and enjoy bitches; that's roves orders to the ignorant masses who have no concept of constitutional liberty. And the posts at free republic prove that no one sucks better then that group.
If bush was not an idiot and we stayed in Afghanistan, Al Quaeda would be weak if not non-existent today, instead bush and his supporters have created a monster that others will have to fix. Not too long ago "conservatives" arrested a man (Galileo) because he said the earth revolved around the sun. They fuck up anything they touch.
Hussein could not attack us and limbaugh could not resist the Siren call of the Dominican Republican.
Trashing "conservative" values is borderline boring.
|
Kutjara
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-11-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Hell, even Iraq would be safer if Hussein was still in power. |
|
Yes, he was a brutal dictator and, together with his sons, responsible for many deaths, but his atrocities look like a charming hobby compared to the chaotic bloodbath Iraq is today.
The only thing BushCo have achieved is to make every single person on this planet less safe.
|
enid602
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-11-06 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
And Iran, and Jordan, and Syria, and Israel, and Saudi Arabia. shall I go on?
|
Greyhound
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-11-06 04:16 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Sad to say that this is true. |
|
Horrible as he was/is, nearly all Iraqis would be much better off if Saddam was still their dictator. Well over 100,000 would still be alive, many more times than that would still be whole, they all would have water, electricity, and food, would still have jobs, and their cities would still exist.
Saddam and all of his thugs, working over-time for 50 years, couldn't wreak the unimaginable havoc that we have.
|
MISSDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Sep-11-06 04:18 PM
Response to Original message |
4. and all things condidered, Iraqis would be better off. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:44 AM
Response to Original message |