Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oh DEAR GOD NO, you mean Condi's been LYING her ass off about 9/11? OH NO!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Human Torch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:17 PM
Original message
Oh DEAR GOD NO, you mean Condi's been LYING her ass off about 9/11? OH NO!
State of Denial: Two months before 9/11, Rice gave the 'brush-off' to 'impending terrorist attack' warning



Ron Brynaert
Published: Saturday September 30, 2006

(Update: Former Counsel to the 9/11 Commission suggests that "ery possibly, someone committed a crime" by engaging in a "cover-up" of the warning)

According to a new book written by Washington Post investigative reporter Bob Woodward, two months before the September 11 attacks, then National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice gave the "brush-off" to an "impending terrorist attack" warning by former C.I.A. director George J. Tenet and his counterterrorism coordinator.

An article in Friday's New York Times first mentioned the warning, and a front page book review of Woodward's State of Denial in Saturday's edition provides more details.

"On July 10, 2001, the book says, Mr. Tenet and his counterterrorism chief, J. Cofer Black, met with Ms. Rice at the White House to impress upon her the seriousness of the intelligence the agency was collecting about an impending attack," David E. Sanger reported on Friday. "But both men came away from the meeting feeling that Ms. Rice had not taken the warnings seriously."

Sanger also reported that Tenet told Woodward that before 9/11, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld was "impeding" efforts to catch Osama bin Laden.

MORE:

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/State_of_Denial_Two_months_before_0930.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. please refrain from impugning her integrity
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Looks like Rummie was worried they
might not have their New Pearl Harbor if the chief patsie was behind bars or 6ft under.

Sanger also reported that Tenet told Woodward that before 9/11, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld was "impeding" efforts to catch Osama bin Laden.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. Could she have perjured herself?
That'd be a serious crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Human Torch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Was she actually "under oath" when she testified?
I know Junior and Evil Dick sidestepped that one, but I'm not sure about Condi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It doesn't seem to matter.

These days, lying to congress seems to carry no penalties whatsoever. They are on the books, but enforcement? Hah!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. She Was.
I'm pretty sure that she was under oath - I recall that the 9/11 folks insisted on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Human Torch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. That was my recollection...Bush & Cheney avoided it, she didn't.
...but since the lies are so widespread across the administration, it's all relative...

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. and she didn't want to be yelling "Historical documents"
double speek
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. Condi was under oath when she lied to the 9/11 widows and said
the August 6 "Bin Laden Determined to Attack in US" memo did not
warn of new attacks.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/08/rice.transcript/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. Yes. They swore her in. I remember that image of contradicta
holding her hand up and swearing to tell the truth.

I wonder if her toes were crossed under the desk.

That's all she seems able to do with any ease - LIE. LIE, LIE, and LIE some more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. If I remember correctly none of them were sworn in....
remember there was some controversy over that fact but it went away...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. But nobody could have foreseen terrorists flying planes into buildings
Sure, maybe Condi knew the terrorists wanted to attack us, but who could expect her to do anything about it? After all, there were thousands of ways the terrorists could have struck us. Condi couldn't prevent ALL of them, could she? So why bother to try to prevent any at all.

This is all a bunch of liberal character assassination designed to take attention away from Clinton's crimes with Charlie Trie and the Arlington Greavegate scandal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-30-06 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. Rice clearly failed her NSA position badly, many words with little content
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
11. Now we know why Bush Co. was so ueber-happy to give Tenet the Medal of
"You Now Shut the F*ck up and be a good Boy" Medal from the President....

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
12. Many Americans still don't realize that she lies as much as Rumsfeld.
Which means almost EVERY word she says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicdot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
14. not condiLIAR 'don't you impugn my integrity' rice !?!
Rice to Sen. Boxer during Secretary of State confirmation hearings:

"But I really hope that you will refrain from impugning my integrity."

She can't even tell the truth about herself.


Transcript of remarks between Boxer and Rice

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/01/18/RICEBOXER.DTL&type=printable



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
16. The devil wears Ferragamo!
When is she ever NOT lying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
17. I think that Condi must be a very intelligent woman. Why??
Because no one could be that fucking stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
18. If true, the term despicable comes to mind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
19. How else could they have pulled off their post9-11 coup?
Of course she lied. 9-11 was meant to go forward. It was part of their plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
20. Why not ask Tenet or Cofer ??
Did they die?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC