Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LIEBERMAN GOES FOR THE JUGULAR-- WES CLARK'S

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 04:42 AM
Original message
LIEBERMAN GOES FOR THE JUGULAR-- WES CLARK'S
Found on DownWithTyranny.

Lieberman has no real game plan to win in Connecticut except the Republican one: fear and smear. He has no ground operation to get out the vote and all he can depend on is that a large Republican turn-out for Governor Jodi Rell and the 3 rubber stamp congresscritters he was campaigning against 6 months ago, Nancy Johnson, Rob Simmons and Chris Shays, will accrue to him as well.

~snip~

Anyway, it turns out Ned is hardly the only one being smeared by Lieberman these days. Last week he was on a right wing website attacking Ted Kennedy, John Kerry and Chris Dodd. I doubt there are any suckers left in Connecticut who think Lieberman has any intention of caucusing with the Democrats if he wins the election in November. He has completely thrown off his disguise and has come out as a full-fledged neocon Republican in all but word; that would come after the election. Today the latest victim of the Lieberman hate and smear messaging is General Wes Clark, an actual Democrat, one who has been all over America campaigning hard and convincingly for other real Democrats, like Jon Tester, Claire McCaskill, Harold Ford, Charlie Brown, Joe Sestak...

If you recall, when they were both running for president in the 2004 Democratic presidential primary, Lieberman turned a debate from fairly collegial to a knife-thrust towards Clark, challenging his loyalty to the Democratic Party. (In retrospect, a perfect tableau for Lieberman's sick, sick politics.) Now Lieberman has told the Journal Inquirer that General Clark is a partisan, name-calling Democrat. Lieberman can only make up his mind about one thing: everyone is wrong and he's right.

So what set off the volatile and desperate Joementum today? Like all reputable Democratic leaders, from Mark Warner, Russ Feingold, Hillary Clinton and Ted Kennedy to Barack Obama, Barbara Boxer and Al Gore, Wes Clark endorsed Ned. Did he call Joe names? Did his endorsement disparage the reprehensible Republican shill Lieberman has turned himself into? You judge:


This is all in reference to this article:

Wesley Clark offers support to Lamont

Retired Army Gen. Wesley Clark, a former Democratic presidential candidate who commanded NATO forces in Europe during the conflict in Kosovo, is helping antiwar Democrat Ned Lamont raise money to unseat U.S. Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman.

~snip~

Standing up to President Bush's failed policy in Iraq, dispensing with self-serving and wishy-washy notions of 'independence,' and pledging to invest in America's future, Ned Lamont is a candidate for Senate who I am proud to endorse," he wrote.

Clark also took a swipe at Lieberman, now running as an independent, saying the senator had "decided to do his best to drag down every Connecticut Democrat's electoral prospects down with him" after "refusing to abide by the results" of the party primary in August. "He continues to provide political cover to President Bush and other local Republicans despite their clearly failed policies," Clark added.

~snip~

Lieberman's campaign spokeswoman, Tammy Sun, on Friday dismissed Clark's endorsement of the senator's opponent. "Joe Lieberman is running for Senate because he's trying to change the kind of partisan name-calling apparent in Wes Clark's recent statement supporting Ned Lamont," she said. "This is just more of the same negative attacks from the Lamont campaign."


I guess Joe doesn't think that Democrats should be endorsing Democratic Senate candidates. :shrug:




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 05:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Warning to anyone who opposes LIEberman
his boyfriend may ship you off to GITMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. Is that crabby old yenta still grinding her gums?
Ship her off on a long cruise already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarbonDate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. I wonder how Lieberman would do....
...if he was the Republican candidate? Would he do better or worse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. He pretty much IS the Republican candidate
in all but name. He's the one that the RNC is supporting. I just wish that the Dems and Indies in CT would get a clue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 06:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. gasp! lieberman smearing wes clark?!?! quelle surprise!!!
not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. How are the polls?
What's people's feeling on the ground. Is Lieberman going to win?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. I don't know.
I keep seeing polls posted around here that show Lieberman 10 pts ahead, and it really worries me. I despise Lieberman as much as I do any Repuke, (even more in some ways) and want him out of there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. This is quite rich!
Clark's in excellent company on Lieberman's shit list. Seems anybody who's anyone makes that list. IMO this is an excellent reflection on Clark. :toast:

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Amazing how Joe even turns on his former friends
like Dodd. Didn't Dodd campaign quite hard for him in the primaries?

But yes, I'm proud to see Wes on Holy Joe's shit list. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
7. Lieberman's out of his league with Clark.
In fact Lieberman's out of his league, period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. It's hard to stay abreast of events in Connecticut here in Arizona,
but I certainly hope Ned is taking JoeHole's "aye" vote for torture, and thumping him soundly with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
9. Sore Loserman is in a bush like snit.
Why - Lieberman has exactly what he wants a high profile as a sanctimonious sore loser who is running out of pure vanity and spite because REAL DEMOCRATS chose someone other than him.

Wes Clark is a beloved:loveya:Democrat and worthy of all respect. Joementum can't compete with the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. I hope he can't compete.
I really want to see that pustule of the Senate soundly burst in Nov. (if you'll pardon the imagery:evilgrin: )

It'd be awsome to see Wes in CT campaigning for Lamont. Two of my favorite guys.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
14. Hi Crunchy!
:hi:

It sounds as if Joe's getting desperate. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
15. Lieberman and Bush** deserve each other.
Preferably in a small cell miles away from the rest of us.
Neither ever made a mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
16. Lieberman won't attack Hillary, Obama, Warner - only Kerry, Kennedy, Clark
because they are the wing of the party he is at WAR with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. True, but Lieberman voted for torture while Hillary did not
I am no fan of Hillary, but she did vote to support habeas corpus while Lieberman voted against it.

Kerry led the fight to bring the troops home from Iraq within a year. Hillary did not support Kerry, but she voted with the majority of Democrats for a mushy version that called for a withdrawal plan at some future date. Lieberman spoke with the GOP against both Democratic plans. "Stay the course" was Lieberman's rallying cry.

Lieberman left the Democratic Party a long time ago, it just took time for most of us to take notice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Hey - did you see the thread about congress passing Kerry's Iraq Summit
Edited on Sun Oct-01-06 11:50 AM by blm
part of the withdrawal plan?

GOPs voting for it are obviously intending to campaign for the next month closer to Kerry on Iraq than to Bush. Too bad Reid won't resubmit the entire Kerry-Feingold withdrawal plan now.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x2269577
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. No, I didn't. Thanks for posting the link.
This is great news! Too bad our Dear Leader is in full denial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. It IS great news, but no one in corpmedia is even mentioning it, though
it's probablty the most positive move that's been made on Iraq in over 3 years.

Wanna bet the "silence" on national news about this vote is calculated, too? But GOP congressmen will make it "local" news to benefit themselves while national news organizations BURY the story so overall public doesn't hear that GOPs are supporting Kerry's Iraq plan OVER Bush's strategy.

And the funny thing is that Nationally known Democrats and pundits aren't talking about it, either. They just keep sitting there like hound dogs when the Dems have no plan for Iraq attack is thrown at them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. The MSM is showing the 6-year old video of Atta in Afghanistan
Edited on Sun Oct-01-06 12:25 PM by IndianaGreen

Sept. 11 hijackers Ziad Jarrah, left, and Mohammed Atta laugh in what is
apparently their last will and testament in a videotape apparently made in
Afghanistan on Jan. 18, 2000.
View related photos

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15082633/

The Foley sexual predator scandal is next in importance (it should be first).

Then there is the Woodward book.

As to Kerry's proposal being passed by Congress, nothing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
17. Lieberman the draft dodger should watch his mouth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-01-06 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
20. Are Lieberman's comments on the RW website well known in CT?
Dodd as the senior senator and Kennedy and Kerry, from over the border, all have considerable support in CT. Kerry easily won the state. Attacking them can't be a great strategy. Also, several pre-primary articles referred to Lieberman as a gentleman, classy, not mean spirited, suggesting that opposing him was somehow wrong. From the way you refer to the comments, they are mean spirited and not those of a classy gentleman.

Congratulations to Wex Clark for campaigning for Lamont - he joins an honorable group being attacked by Lieberman. I can't believe Lieberman's words and actions aren't acts of desperation - suggesting less possible internal polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC