Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

51 in the Senate is NOT good enough if one of them is ......

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:54 AM
Original message
51 in the Senate is NOT good enough if one of them is ......
..... that self selected third party guy running against Lamont.

He has no reason to keep any of his promises, including the one where he said he'd caucus with the Democrats.

We need to get at least a 52-48 margin.

That's a lot of work. I sure hope we're all up for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. I have that same problem in the House...
there are a number of Dinos that could go independent and side with the Repugs giving the Repugs control of the House.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. Much as I'd like to take the Senate
it's not going to happen. Our odds are better in the House, and frankly, if I had to pick which one I'd rather have a dem majority in, it's the House, hands down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I want them both, but if not, then my preferred structure is this:
House - Democratic majority
Senate - Republican
President - Democrat

Democrats would be better than Republicans at controlling both Congress and the Presidency, but let's face it. Power corrupts and it's probably better if there's some opposition to keep us on the straight and narrow.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. I'm with you on preferring the House, if there's only one.
However, please don't not count your chickens...

If the election were held today, Dems would likely obtain a tie in the Senate. I agree, it's not good enough. However, we have just over a month to go and *everything* is going our way. There is no way that the Repukes can turn this around as long as they "stay the course". Sadly for them, that's virtually all they have. They've painted themselves into a corner and there is no escape for them.

All they have is their dirty tricks, and the electorate is not going to be listening to that because they are absolutely sick to death of the slime. Anything the Repukes do is only going to make things worse for them.

About the House...

It doesn't matter if there's a few DINOs in the House. Progressives will be in charge of all the important committees. That's what matters. And we'll control the agenda. The Repuke bullshit of the past several years in the House is all going to come home to roost.

The Repukes are going to reap the whirlwind next month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. These Diebold machines have me worried now. Several close races
are going on now. The r's can rig them easier if the states involved use a lot of Diebolds. I'm not so much worried of hacking/card swapping as I am of the Diebolds being delivered with bias built in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Diebold ain't the only one. ES&S machines can be hacked also
In fact, any computer that exists can be hacked. Anyone who tries to tell you otherwise is either woefully unaware of how computers work, or has an agenda. It can be hacked remotely if it's plugged into the network. Of course, you can be plugged into the network by being plugged into the electrical socket nowadays.

http://news.com.com/Power+outlets+may+feed+home+networking/2100-1033_3-269008.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I understand the potential of hacking when networked, I'm very
suspicious of Diebold itself, recall their CEO's statement about "we will be making sure that Bush wins Ohio"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pale Blue Dot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. Agree 100%
I believe that Lieberman will caucus with whoever will give him the most power. If he wins, either the Democrats will have to give him a high-ranking committee assignment (which he really doesn't deserve considering how he's betrayed the party), or, if it is 51-49 or 50-50, he will bolt to the Republicans, who almost surely would appease him.

Sounds like a good time to do this:

www.nedlamont.com/donate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. regardless of whether the Dems win the Senate or not...
Edited on Mon Oct-02-06 01:02 PM by wyldwolf
...it will be close to 50/50, a few over or under for Democrats, and centrists from both parties will be the power brokers.

Same in the House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Centrists are one thing ......
.... people who put self before party are another thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I realize some have a personality conflict with Lieberman
Edited on Mon Oct-02-06 01:05 PM by wyldwolf
...but the fact is, should he win, he won't change the way he votes on issues. So, if we're speaking of a Senate with the Dems ahead or behind by one or two, the most powerful Dems will be Clinton, Bayh, Biden, etc.

(this in no way implies an endorsement of Lieberman.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. For God's sake, it's hard enough to get to 50 or 51.
Don't push your luck. Taking back the Senate in one election cycle is hard work when you only have 45 seats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I know its hard ......
..... but that doesn't change the essential calculus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. I agree
There's also the possibility that he could take a SOD job with Bush and the Repug Governor would appoint a Repug to replace him, losing us that seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Yeah, there's that, too.
The only way I'll feel happy at 51 is if Lamont is sitting in the junior Connecticut Senate seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hvn_nbr_2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-02-06 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
16. That worries me too.
I wouldn't be at all surprised to see him switch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC