Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, are the Diebold execs and programmers cons or neocons?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
hvn_nbr_2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 04:18 PM
Original message
So, are the Diebold execs and programmers cons or neocons?
So, are the Diebold execs and programmers cons or neocons?

With all the talk about Bay Buchanan, Richard Viguerie, Colin Powell, Toady Woodward, and so many others jumping ship and dumping on the Boy King and the Boy Lover, I'm kind of wondering where the people who count stand. You know, the people who actually "count" the votes. What if Diebold decides to sit this one out and let their machines just count the votes? Or what if they just decide that they want their business to continue and that enough people are onto them now that they need to lay low for this one or potentially go out of business?

How will we know or how would we know? Here are some possibilities:

- No new software patches being applied to Diebold machines, although that's hard to know, but people in election departments may be starting to pay attention and be willing to speak up.

- No one-sided machine "glitches" on election day.

- Pukelicans panicking ahead of election day instead of confidently predicting victory.

- Rovian hail mary plays like bombing Iran, overthrowing Chavez, or small plane crashes with Dem Senate candidates aboard. :scared:

What other ideas do you have for how we'll know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. All the neocons should be cons
as in convicts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philly_bob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-03-06 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Are election machine fraudsters local or national?
If fraudsters are local and undisciplined, then I expect them to intervene, in a fairly obvious way. Monkey with paw caught in cookie jar, won't let go of cookie.

If they're national and disciplined, run by Bush's unhappy bosses, they may sit this one out.

But then again a Democratic Congress would probably fix the voting machine problem. So the key to the election machines will be changed...

Did you notice that in a recent Ohio ballot referendum, in which only one proposition affected ballot counting issues, the exit polls were right on all the propositions except the ballot counting one. It was pretty obvious. In other words, they were local and undisciplined.

Anyway, good question...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC