Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cash Edge for Democrat in Ohio Gov. Race

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 08:53 PM
Original message
Cash Edge for Democrat in Ohio Gov. Race
Democrat Ted Strickland raised more than twice as much money in September as did Republican Ken Blackwell in Ohio's gubernatorial race, campaign finance figures released Wednesday show.

Strickland, a congressman who represents a rural southeastern district, reported raising $2.3 million last month for a total of $13.5 million to date. Strickland said he has about $9.8 million cash in hand.

Blackwell, Ohio's secretary of state, said he raised $1.1 million in September and nearly $11.3 million since the campaign began. He has about $6 million in hand.

The campaign became the most expensive governor's race in Ohio history last month, when it topped the $18 million Republican Bob Taft and Democrat Lee Fisher raised in 1998.

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Ohio-Governor.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Big money donors switching to Strickland
They know Blackwell is a goner. I just hope they don't think they're "buying" Strickland. We need new leadership in Ohio, not the same old corporate mismanagement and corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why have Republicans wasted 11.3 million on Blackwell?
Also, they've wasted $20 million on Sanitarium.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-04-06 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. to keep the mouth pieces and slickyslides
happy once they are out of power, and of course there has to be a whole lot of money floating around to attempt to bribe and defame the winners after they loose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC