Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

consitution question URGENT PLEASE

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
historian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 04:26 PM
Original message
consitution question URGENT PLEASE
Help!!! Does anyone know whether the constitution only covers citizens and could you ples indicate some cases which refer to this prefereably a supreme decision
thanks (urgent please)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. What part of the Constitution are you referring to?
Edited on Thu Oct-05-06 04:27 PM by MrCoffee
It depends...different parts apply differently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
historian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. the people and citizens
Im trying to find out whether the detainees in guantanamo, who are in offically recognized jurisdictional territory, are protected under the constitution whether they are citizens or not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. They are not citizens. Is this a trick question or something?
Why on earth would you think they are citizens?

There might be a US citizen or 2, who knows, but the overwhelming majority are not US citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
historian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. i know
i know they are not citizens and thats the whole point. Do non citizens have the same rights as citizens when it comes to the constitution? also they are some us citizens who had been detained and are treated differently. thats what im trying to find out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Like I said, it depends on the constitutional question as to whether
it applies universally or just to citizens. Your OP and subsequent responses are way to vague to give an intelligible or meaningful answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
historian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. sorry
well here is the problem - the detainees in guantanamo have been denied any rights to counsel or habeas corpus. The constitution says that we the people , which i assume means all who live within any area under us jurisdiction, are protected under the constitution. If this is not the case, then the detainees are not entitled to any rights? but the supreme court has determined under these circumstances that they do have rights, so does that holding supersede the term we the people and automatically grant rights to anyone detained at guantanamo? I hope i mangage to express myself better, thanks for your patience
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I wasn't trying to insult you, honestly...i just didn't understand the OP.
Part of your post cites the "We the People" language of the Preamble, which as far as I know has never been cited by any court to justify anything...it's not operative language.

If I understand you correctly, you're asking whether the Suspension Clause ("Article I, Section 9, Clause 2: "The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.") applies to detainees at Guantanamo. Correct?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
historian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. YES!!!
I know you werent insulting me and i appreciate you taking the time. In essence i need to know if anyone who commits a crime in usa territory has the right to habeas corpus. also does denying habeas corpus automatically means denial to counsel and due process
thanks again
your help is much appreciated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think (not entirely sure tho) that the clause about
documents signed in one state are valid in another was used to grant full constitutional rights to visitors from other countries while in the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. if I'm not mistaken, the legal/judicial stuff applies to non-citizens
except the voting, running for office, etc. stuff.

But in terms of legal stuff, even non-citizens have miranda rights, right to trial by jury, yada yada yada, until they get shipped out of the country and back to their own.

Though I'm not a lawyer, that has been my understanding from my readings and other accounts: that EVERYONE within the borders and on American soil (who are there legally) have all the protections, and even most of the rights, of citizens.

it's one of the things that make this country so cool, along with being automatically given the chance to be a citizen just by being born here, even if your parents are from another country and here on vacation.

Or made it cool, before PATRIOT and Reagan and other republicans fucked the country over and turned half into a police state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nealmhughes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Citizenship is mentioned but a few times in the Constitution, and mostly
about who is one and how one is made from an immigrant and to set office and voting qualifications.

For example the President must be a "Natural Born citizen" (whatever that is, on US soil, or from US citizens who were abroad, or at sea has never been tested). One must be a citizen of his or her respective state and the US to hold a congressional seat and there is also a time limit and an age limit as well.

Ex-slaves were made citizens by amendment.

That is about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. constitution
Citizens of the Kingdom of Bush?? or American Citizens???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
historian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. trick question
well in the old days one could say that being a citizen was the same thing as living inthe kingdom of bush 2nd but no longer.
Well american citizen actually
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. I don't think the issue has been resolved
The SCOTUS held that the statutory provision enacted by Congress relating to habeas corpus didn't distinguish between citizens and foreign nationals and thus the detainees in Guantanamo were entitled to seek a writ of habeas corpus. HOwever, that decision doesn't resolve the issue of whether Congress could constitutionally limit the writ to citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC