Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Closeted Gay Republicans and a Party in Political Free-Fall

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 05:17 PM
Original message
Closeted Gay Republicans and a Party in Political Free-Fall
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lawrence-odonnell/closeted-gay-republicans-_b_31040.html

The LA Times has outed Kirk Fordham today. He will not be the last closeted gay Republican outed by this scandal.

Today's NY Times has a chart that outlines the "key communications" in the House of Representatives about Mark Foley's inappropriate contact with pages. More than one of the names in the chart, which includes Kirk Fordham, are rumored to be closeted gay Republicans who have been working at the highest levels of the Republican leadership.

They have been looking at their names in print for the last couple of days and no doubt fearing for their futures in a Party that is in political free-fall.

Are ambitious closeted gay Republican officials, the most reliable people Speaker Hastert could have delegated the Foley problem to last year? Obviously not. Heat on a closeted gay Republican in the House is heat on all closeted gay Republicans in the House. The most innocent Foley emails were enough to worry the parents of the recipient. They were enough to worry the closeted gay Republicans too. But the closeted gay Republicans were perfectly positioned in the House to make the problem disappear.

Now two Republican staffers are locked in a credibility contest: it's Kirk Fordham v. Scott Palmer, Hastert's chief of staff. Palmer flatly denies that Fordham warned him about Foley. Hastert's political life depends entirely on Scott Palmer's credibility. I can't find anyone in Washington who knows Palmer who thinks his credibility can survive this test.

So when does Mehlman get officially outed? Karma's a bitch Repukes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Another parallel?
Weren't the Nazis filled with members of high rank that were "fascinated" by homosexuality?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. That's right, and the similarity goes deeper
If you were gay and Nazi and were reasonably discreet about the gay part I think you did just fine. If you were gay and not Nazi, well... It was a pink triangle and eventually off to the death camp. While the camps aren't up and running here. Yet. There is the same distinction drawn by the Rethugs between "their" gays and the rest of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-05-06 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. I've said it before & I'll say it again...
...this can be nothing but good for America in the long run, no matter how much pain it causes individuals in the short run.

The only GOPpies who can count to three seem to be the closeted (and not-so-closeted, or at least 'peeking out') gays. If the Party engages in a suicidal bloody purge to placate its homophobe nutjob base, they will be crippling themselves.

If they DON'T give in to the 'urge to purge,' they'll lose the nutjobs, thereby crippling themselves again.

I can't decide which I prefer, actually, but either way it results in a cleaner, less corrupt, decenter America.

happily,
Bright
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC