|
Let me explain these two seemingly (to some) opposite opinions.
Impeachment: We actually have no choice. The destruction that has been wrought on the foundations of our government are horrendous. The damage that has been done to our reputation and international standing is frightening and counter to our long term best interests. It is pretty clear to virtually anyone capable of more brain function than cortex reflex that most of our top government officials have, singularly and as part of a conspiracy, committed serious crimes. Not blow jobs. Serious, real, death-penalty-eligible crimes. There's no need to call for impeachment. Just calling for hearings will suffice. Right now, it is my firm conviction that most of America is simply not on board with the notion of impeachment. They need to be convinced. I am just as certain that, once we start hearings and put these people under oath, the public will be begging for impeachment. No one likes to be punk'd. And we've been punke'd.
Pelosi: I've seen our Leader pilloried here for two specific statements. One on Press The Meat a few months back when she said 'impeachment is off the table' and one just this weekend when she said pretty much the same thing. Why would I, an impeachment hawk, not be concerned about this? Well, for anyone who can't see the obvious, its very simple.
Its politics. And, as a politician who wants to see her party win both houses of Congress this go-round, Ms. Pelosi is speaking to the larger audience out there. Not us hard core, Democtratic Death Match team members. She's speaking to the 'uncertains' and the 'uniformed' and the 'undecideds' and the 'morons' and the 'sheeple'.
Further, in her role as Leader (soon to be Speaker) it is her job to control the flow of the House. The hearings are not directly hers to call (of *course* she can influence them to happen or not, but the actual call is from the committee heads - like the ought-to-be-sainted John Conyers). I've not heard anythng about no hearings. I've heard 'drain the swamp'. But I've not heard 'don't investigate'. Pretty much only as an avoidance tactic toward being trapped into addressing directly the impeachment thing. (How do you think "CRAZY PERSON DEMOCRAT LEADER PELOSI SAYS BUSH SHOULD BE IMPEACHED" will play on talk radio and the corporate news?) (Clue: Foley? Foley who?)
Remember ..... impeachment is very much an ahead of the curve position.
And to get to impeachment, there needs to be a process. And that starts with hearings. We all know damned good and well that if the tables were turned and the other side were talking during a campaign, in advance of even the first real hearing, about impeaching our president, we'd be up in arms and accusing them, rightly so, of over reaching and vindictiveness.
Impeachment is fresh on the minds of many. They have at least a vague idea of how it works.
So, for now, I'll keep both my positions. I want Bush and everyone else impeached. And I stand by Leader Pelosi.
(By the way, I'm such an impeachment hawk that I want Fat Nino and Little Slappy up on charges too for their felonious assault on our Democracy in 2000. They simply had NO STANDING to do what they did in the way they did it.)
|