trof
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-09-06 05:34 PM
Original message |
"only 1/60th of Hiroshima." CBS |
|
WELL, I'm CERTAINLY encouraged by this. Shucks, just a firecracker. :eyes:
Not to worry. Nothing to see here. Just go back to shopping.
|
dipsydoodle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-09-06 05:36 PM
Response to Original message |
HiFructosePronSyrup
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-09-06 05:36 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Hiroshima ~15 kilotons. |
|
Reports so far are about 0.5 kilotons.
You do the math.
|
RamboLiberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-09-06 05:37 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Jane's Defense Weekly is saying it's a possible failure |
|
I posted a thread in GD - I'm about to leave work so forgive me for not getting.
|
hijinx87
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-09-06 05:51 PM
Response to Original message |
4. on one hand, that's why you test them. |
|
on the other hand, his nukes currently seem to work as well as his missiles. :thumbsdown:
|
Darkseid69
(285 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-09-06 05:57 PM
Response to Original message |
|
If perhaps the whole thing was a hoax on North Korea's part. Load up a couple hundred tons of TNT underground and set it off.
|
calimary
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-09-06 06:16 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Oh yeah? Well, yes, I'm shopping. I'm shopping my column around. |
doc03
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-09-06 06:38 PM
Response to Original message |
7. NBC News said 1 kiloton and Hiroshima |
|
was 12 kilotons, that looks like 1/12th to me. CBS said 1/60, that would be .2 kilotons. I heard another report it was .5 kiloton the way I figure that would be 1/24th. Now I read on here it may have been a dud??????
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:09 AM
Response to Original message |