Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was honesty worst policy for Santorum?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 11:51 AM
Original message
Was honesty worst policy for Santorum?
http://www.pennlive.com/news/patriotnews/index.ssf?/base/columnists/1160269812101650.xml&coll=1&thispage=1

Was honesty worst policy for Santorum?
Sunday, October 08, 2006

The Cone of Silence has done its job for Bob Casey, apparently. All he had to do was keep his mouth shut and not be Rick Santorum.

And bam! Casey's in the U.S. Senate.

At least that's what I hear. In separate conversations last week, two biz-group lobbyists who work the right side of the Capitol told me that Rick Santorum is done, that he won't clock more than 40 percent in the general election.

They could be wrong, but guys who push the agenda of the rich and powerful tend to know when someone on their team comes up toast.

What do you think it was that did Rick in?

Was it being too honest about what's on his mind?

Was it telling the Associated Press that Americans have no right to privacy in their homes?

Was it his dislike for public schools? He has noted that they were not mentioned in the Constitution.

Was it his disdain for women who aren't home taking care of the children?

Or his peculiar view of economics: "The notion that college education is a cost-effective way to help poor, low-skill, unmarried mothers with high school diplomas or GEDs move up the economic ladder is just wrong."

Huh?

Was it the trash TV ad purporting to show Bob Casey's political allies in a jail cell? With actors held over from a Sopranos' audition and muddy references to real wise guys who didn't even contribute to Casey?

Rick, you mean Bobby's in with bad guys? Casey's dirty and you're clean?

Dude, can you say "Jack Abramoff"?


<<<more>>>

Honestly, I can't see the republican party investing any more money into the Pennsylvania race knowing that there are plenty of other races much closer that they could feasibly lose (ie RI, VA, TN, MO to name a few).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. And 2 of the guys named in the ad gave money to Santorum actually!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-10-06 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. People were critical of Casey not doing much of attack campaigning
Casey was smart - he knew Rick would bring his own campaign down and all Casey had to do was provide the alternative on the ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC